Search Posts
If a person multiclasses from a Gunslinger into a Gun Chemist, would it be considered to have already aquired the Gunsmith ability if the Gun Chemist "gunsmith" ability states that the gun is identical to the Gunslingers gun obtained from the Gunslingers gunsmith ability?
I don't know if the Paizo Web designer has been informed of this already or not but the new Web design really isn't user friendly at all. I've tried to get to Paizo pathfinder products & it just keeps taking me to the same empty page where I can only keep selecting a pathfinder link which goes no where. Finding this forum page to post this was honestly just luck by clicking different links on the home page not knowing what would lead to where. In the original Web design there was a list of links that clearly stated what they were for & so it was by far more user friendly than it is now. Hopefully the Web site can be redesigned to be more user friendly in the future because as it stands right now I can't find any product information besides the ones I've already paid for & are in my downloads list.
Okay, so here's my issue. There's an argument from a single individual that if a polymorph spell doesn't change your base game size (example: medium size human turning into a medium size tiger) then spells that change your size (like enlarge person) work because the polymorph spell didn't change your size (his argument is that the "other" in "In addition, other spells that change your size have no effect on you while you are under the effects of a polymorph spell." of the polymorph section only applies if polymorph changes your base size). I've tried explaining multiple times & various ways that it's not possible to stack the polymorph spell with a size increasing spell even if you stay in the same size category. He wants an official ruling saying he's wrong & I've tried to message Paizo directly to get an official ruling but was told to post on here instead. So if any official working for Paizo could comment on this that would be great but I'll still welcome all comments.
So I was wondering something that has sparked a large debate in another group I'm part of. The Kineticits' basic blasts all state they all target a foe. My question is this, does that mean Kineticist are only able to target things that threaten their lives or would they be able to target anything they want with their basic attack ability? Only asking this because me & a couple other GM's can't fully agree on what that means. Some of us say you can't target a stationary door or wall with the basic attack ability because they aren't threatening the characters life but others say it's possible to target them if they are blocking your way from progressing. Thoughts & opinions (especially from Paizo staff that created the classes abilities) would be greatly appreciated & thanks in advance.
I'm not 100% sure if no one else has pointed this out but there was two issues in the first playtest that I noticed right away. The other issues from what I read in the recent post from Mark Seifter seem to have been addressed already. My two issues are as follows. 1) Armor Silence is a good Talent for any of the Vigilante variants. Since every version has stealth as a class skill this talent would go well with any of the Vigilante versions. 2) Armor Skin would make a lot more sense if it was in the Stalker Vigilante variant since it is the only version that has Acrobatics as a class skill. It makes very little to no sense for a talent to be in a vigilante variant that doesn't even make use of Acrobatics as a class skill when both Acrobatics & Escape Artist as effected by the talent. |
