data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d200/9d2003dcf79c0a3c015eace2606a991211025607" alt=""
Coffee Demon |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc1d4/bc1d47543e4a51b3f85ebf90a3aeaca8f476233e" alt="Chatterer"
Hi all, Just wondering if anyone else feels like the last couple APs (Return of the Runelords, Tyrant’s Grasp, and the first book of Age of Ashes and summary of the AP) have been underwhelming to you? The plots feel simplistic and immature to me, the NPCs have little motivation, there’s not great connection between books, and plenty of weird plot holes. I find that more recent books take more work to adapt into something that's sensible. Is anyone else finding this? (See my review for Secrets of Roderick's Cove for an example of more specific complaints I have).
I’ve noticed that AP reviews on Paizo are also generally lower since War for the Crown, so it’s not just me perhaps? (**Only counting reviews with at least 2 reviews - a sample size of "1" doesn't say much, especially since there are a few reviewers who consistently give 4-5 stars).
I keep hoping the next AP will be better but I keep getting disappointed. I feel like they’re writing for people who just want a list of things to kill. There’s little room for subtlety and plot development.
Is there a new developer for APs or something? Have they tightened their budget on APs to invest in other things? Thoughts? I'm hoping that it's just that they've had to invest so many people-hours in developing the new Edition over the last year.
I’m happy to be more precise about the problems with any of the last 13 books, if anyone wants to get into the nitty gritty...