Christopherwbuser |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
If we set the time machine back to the heady days of 2009 and the Council of Thieves AP, we get this tidbit from the introduction of Iomedae:
"Though born in Cheliax, she is worshiped by many people outside that land, and once the direct threat of the Worldwound is ended she plans to wipe her homeland free of its diabolical trait."
Twelve years later, with Second Edition and the Worldwound safely sealed... is it time?
And if so, how would it work? It's not like Asmodeus led the legions of hell in conquering Cheliax. Rather, as far as we know, he supported the Thrunes, but it was still their free will that led them to Him, and it was still their direct actions as mortals that won them the country.
So how actively can She act in wiping Cheliax free of the Thrunes and their Hellish allies? Sending her Herald to Egorian seems rather... blunt, as does a dream to all her paladins to see Abrogail removed from the throne.
And if she did, how would Hell respond? Is Cheliax really so important to Asmodeus that he would dangle the key to Rovagug's prison and say "They asked to be Mine, and they are, and if I can't keep them, you can't have them either?" in reponse? Would it be the Crusade all over again, but against devils instead of demons?
What about the bordering nations? Especially Nidal and Andoran? If Iomedae truly tried to "wipe the diabolical clean out of Cheliax", would it plunge the enter Inner Sea into war?
Of course, this is the same AP that gave us the infamous paladins of Asmodeus, so if it's something Paizo wants to chalk up to 'early installment wierdness' and leave safely in the sands of time, that's understandable, but it got me to thinking. Would this be fertile ground for a truly epic Adventure Path? Or would such a conflict and the aftermath be too much of a change to the setting?