![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
![Mephit](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/mephit.jpg)
I generated a few new numbers. These are the number of towers captured inside the first 24 hours by settlement, a number of characters pledged to each settlement and also remarks about towers lost.
All these numbers have some flaws. There can be 1 to 3 characters per account. For EL I would say that we have 1.75 characters per account on average meaning 3 out of 4 acounts have their main and their DT pledged to us. I don't know how representative this is.
The tower holdings lists all towers you captured before the last downtime. This means that towers gained after day 1 are not included. But I did include towers lost.
I don't have these numbers for Brighthaven or Aragon. Brighthaven seem to have reorganized which reset all their data to zero. Aragon still seem to struggle to get leadership sorted out / get it active.
There are 197 towers taken by 17 settlements with >0 towers which is 11.6 on average. A total of 9 towers changed hands. I don't know if there are still open PvP windows - in this case numbers can change.
Settlement,Characters,Character gain,Towers,Towers lost and to whom
Brighthaven 97 0 ? ?
Aragon 21 16 ? ?
Phaeros 66 9 25 -1 Golgotha, -1 Tavernhold
Keeper's Pass 41 5 16 -1 Canis Castrum
Golgotha 93 43 15 -1 Phaeros
Stoneroot Glade 56 0 14
Hope's End 7 0 14 -4 Sunholm
Ozem's Vigil 39 2 12
Emerald Lodge 31 7 12
Forgeholm 23 7 12 -1 Blackfeather Keep
Tavernhold 21 3 12
Callambea 42 2 11
Talonguard 13 1 11
Freevale 12 4 11
Auroral 13 6 8
Sunholm 13 5 6
Blackwood Glade 8 1 6
Hammerfall 6 -2 6
Blackfeather Keep 9 0 4
Guardheim 6 2 2
Canis Castrum 9 8 0
Kreuz Bernstein 4 0 0
Dagedai 1 0 0
Hammerforge 1 0 0
Alderwag none
Blackwatch none
Deadman's Glen none
Doomhammer none
Highroad none
Iron Gauntlet none
River Bank none
Terra Firma none
New Daggermark none
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
![Imron Gauthfallow](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/6.-Id_portraitl.jpg)
We asked GW to change leadership on our Sponsored companies, so that we could get all our active players into one company. During this process it reset our towers, and cause half a dozen issues/bugs with our membership. Everything has been resolved, but it caused us to lose a tower, after downtime it should show us as having 20 towers.
On a side note: I want to thank GW for fixing our issues, but I also want to point out that if they weren't so insistant about multiple companies, we would have all just been in one company like everyone else. Eventually we will split back into all our sponsored companies.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
![Berserker Cannibal](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9238-Berserker.jpg)
A better resolution would have been to allow up to three members of the settlement managers choice to be a proxy in his / her absence. These proxies would have the powers to:
1. Accept company applications
2. Accept individual player applications to their own company, if different than founding company.
3. Kick / remove any company they themselves have accepted.
The Settlement Manager retains the power to:
1. Name the settlement / founding company
2. Edit settlement description
3. Appoint / Remove Settlement Management Proxies
4. Remove any company or individual member from settlement.
This to me is minimum viable product for settlement management. This should have been in place during alpha.