| Sverlisk Sssskirssk |
My friend and I would really like to play in a campaign together, which as of yet we have been unable to do since one of us is always GM. We are hoping a kind GM type person would be willing to run the Kingmaker AP for us. I don't believe picking up 2 or 3 additional people will be a problem as this is a fairly high demand campaign. We have already created characters which we feel would be enjoyable both for ourselves and a prospective GM. We are certainly willing to adjust our characters to fit whatever creation guidelines a GM might have.
I believe that we have quite strong back stories, and a GM could potentially have quite a bit of fun incorporating them into the story line. If you are interested in GMing for us please post in here and/or PM myself or lunkhead. If you are interested in rolling along side us then post your character in this thread as well.
| Cainbar Stonehammer |
Just wanted to check in and say, welcome to whoever is bold and kind enough to gm for us along with future party members. To reiterate what my friend mentioned, this would be an awesome opportunity for two people who really enjoy the pathfinder system and each other's play styles, but are never able to be players on the same table. Know that we are both committed to a full adventure path fully aware that it will take several years to complete. We are very flexible in play style and our character creation to match any gm that wishes to run the adventure. Also wanted to mention if anybody wanted to integrate into our backstory (posting as our characters we wish to play) we would gladly build off those stories to enrich both our characters and the interested person as well.
Look forward to settling the Stolen Lands!
Raven Silvertongue
|
Raven and Johan, welcome to the thread. Are you currently posting as the characters that you would like to play, or will you be making different ones?
We are posting as characters we created for a Hell's Rebels recruitment. So we would possibly need to adjust or create new characters to fit into this campaign.
Vorrs
|
My friend and I would really like to play in a campaign together, which as of yet we have been unable to do since one of us is always GM. We are hoping a kind GM type person would be willing to run the Kingmaker AP for us. I don't believe picking up 2 or 3 additional people will be a problem as this is a fairly high demand campaign. We have already created characters which we feel would be enjoyable both for ourselves and a prospective GM. We are certainly willing to adjust our characters to fit whatever creation guidelines a GM might have.
My friend and I (formerly Raven and Johan) are working on Kingmaker characters, a Slayer (posted here) and a Cavalier.
Also - I did get a PM from someone who was potentially interested in being a GM. I'm waiting to hear back from him.
| YttriumDervish |
Hello; I'm the interested GM that was messaging Vorrs earlier about this.
I count six different people here, is that correct? Aliases and whatnots...
So, let me get something going. I'll look over the character submissions here, make sure there isn't anything I would care to have you change, and we can get started. I don't think there will be much of a problem running it with six, but I can always throw something extra into the mix if necessary.
That is, unless @Dalgar the Great would still like to run it as well. In that case, since there are two groups with two floaters, we could look at splitting into two campaigns and rounding out the groups.
| Sverlisk Sssskirssk |
Hello; I'm the interested GM that was messaging Vorrs earlier about this.
I count six different people here, is that correct? Aliases and whatnots...
So, let me get something going. I'll look over the character submissions here, make sure there isn't anything I would care to have you change, and we can get started. I don't think there will be much of a problem running it with six, but I can always throw something extra into the mix if necessary.
That is, unless @Dalgar the Great would still like to run it as well. In that case, since there are two groups with two floaters, we could look at splitting into two campaigns and rounding out the groups.
You are correct. If Dalgar the Great wishes to run a campaign as well, I see no issues with splitting the groups. Glad to have you onboard. Let me know if there is anything I can do to make things easier for you.
| YttriumDervish |
You are correct. If Dalgar the Great wishes to run a campaign as well, I see no issues with splitting the groups. Glad to have you onboard. Let me know if there is anything I can do to make things easier for you.
I will! I'll need several days before I can even say I'm ready to start; I assume that's okay? I made a Discussion thread for everyone to pop into while I get rolling and we wait to hear from Dalgar, and while...
Mine isn't a submission.
But you do express interest, and would make a submission, correct? That's good enough to count as a 6th. Go ahead and roll something up; feel free to use particularly Sverlisk as an example, as that is the one I've looked at the most thoroughly and don't see anything I'd change. If Dalgar does want to run one, he may or may not have different guidelines, though.
Here's the Discussion thread.
Vorrs
|
Hello; I'm the interested GM that was messaging Vorrs earlier about this.
I count six different people here, is that correct? Aliases and whatnots...
So, let me get something going. I'll look over the character submissions here, make sure there isn't anything I would care to have you change, and we can get started. I don't think there will be much of a problem running it with six, but I can always throw something extra into the mix if necessary.
That is, unless @Dalgar the Great would still like to run it as well. In that case, since there are two groups with two floaters, we could look at splitting into two campaigns and rounding out the groups.
Sounds great!!! Vorrs and Ricean are excited to play. Thanks.
| GM Barrister |
I would still be interested in running this, I just need a little prep time. And if we get another person or two I'd be fine splitting players 4/3 or 4/4.
I'm in the same boat, so we're all good. Would you want to each take a team, plus one of the individuals, and then recruit for one more each, or take both teams in one game and do one recruitment for two more? Personally I'm fine with letting them decide, since we did come to their thread.
| GM Barrister |
We currently have a Bard and Paladin, a Cavalier and Slayer, plus a Cleric.
That's what I was going Elek; plus background skills (without Lore), 150 gp, and eventually fractional bonuses if anyone wanted to multiclass. I had also made these restrictions:
Any Core race, plus Ifrit, Oread, Sylph, Undine, Gillmen, Kitsune, Nagaji, and Samsaran.
Let's also leave Occult Adventures out of this. Everything else Pathfinder should be fine.
As far as I know Dalgar hasn't set any.
| Dalgar the Great |
My specifications are as follows:
20 point buy
Background skills
Fractional bonuses
Two traits, one of which is a campaign trait from Kingmaker.
200 gp (50 of which should be spent on non-alchemical, non-potion/scroll gear, preferably something for flavor purposes)
Core Races plus the four Elemental races, Nagaji, Changlings, Fetchlings, and Gripli
Classes from Core, APG, ACG, and the Ultimate lines are good except Summomer. Gonna have to say no to Occult because I haven't read it yet. If you have any special requests just ask. :)
I'm gonna let them decide how they want to handle the splitting up of the players.
| Korak The Boisterous |
Dalgar. How would thou feel about the Instructor Archetype?
Did i just resurrect this?
No.
| Dalgar the Great |
Dalgar. How would thou feel about the Instructor Archetype?
I'd personally be fine with it provided it doesn't lead to any cheese down the line. This is the one campaign that I'm expecting the PC's to take the Leadership feat anyways.