Our Mysterious Benefactor |
A scroll of restoration is 1,700 gp, yes. Currently there are no divine casters in Ravengro of a high enough level, but Lepidstadt will have casters high enough.
Caesare Montoya |
I would never buy the scroll if you can get a priest to do it. Couple of reasons. Simplest is that the casting by a priest is cheaper ;-) Especially if it is from your faith.
Cireth Aldwulf |
For each negative level a creature has, it takes a cumulative –1 penalty on all ability checks, attack rolls, combat maneuver checks, Combat Maneuver Defense, saving throws, and skill checks. In addition, the creature reduces its current and total hit points by 5 for each negative level it possesses. The creature is also treated as one level lower for the purpose of level-dependent variables (such as spellcasting) for each negative level possessed. Spellcasters do not lose any prepared spells or slots as a result of negative levels. If a creature's negative levels equal or exceed its total Hit Dice, it dies.
So as an example you could cast cure moderate wounds, but would do so as a level 2 caster.
Our Mysterious Benefactor |
Our newest gameplay thread is alive and kicking! Feel free to stop by and let us begin our next chapter!
Xerice Lockhart |
Could you make the other gameplay thread inactive?
Ezechias |
In the end, how much does everyone's share amount to? I would like to buy a new armor before we venture too far, if possible.
Sonny Wright |
It turns out Mother Grimburrow was able to cast the two restorations I needed. If we could subtract 2560gp from the pooled loot and then split it 6 ways. Sonny won't take a share this time round to make up for the restorations. The only loot i have interest in is the Ring of Prot +1. But I'm probably not 1st in line for that. I will hold on to the wand of lesser restoration and the healer's kits. I'll give the wand of hold person to Xerice. That's much more her thing after all. :)
Xerice Lockhart |
Loved that rat interaction :).
Also, yay on hold persons ;).
Xerice Lockhart |
Pfft, I can also heal ;).
Xerice Lockhart |
As a way to increase Xerice's capabilities I was thinking about animating an undead corpse. Would the party be okay with that, and how bad would people on the street react to it?
Our Mysterious Benefactor |
Would an undead animal be less offensive than an undead humanoid? Just curious how Sonny's morality would treat it.
Xerice Lockhart |
True, or an undead monster like this spider. It means we could have a monster work for the powers of gooood ;).
Caesare Montoya |
It is not the form of the vessel, it is the vessel. No matter how you try to hide it, you do an evil act.
Apart from that fact, we are still in Ustalav.
If the GM says diffrently.. this is his game.... but as far as I remember Ustalav an undead pet means pitchfork and torches.
And I can for the love of any god not imagine that a Paladin of saranrae would accept an undead traveling with him.
Xerice Lockhart |
I can't think of it as evil if we use it to do good. especially if it was quite the monster beforehand :P.
But now we are going into a discussion of ethics ;).
Sonny Wright |
Let's see cleric and paladin of Sarenrae in the party. Undead (of any type) are anathema to Sarenrae. I doesn't matter whats undead they are going to want to make it dead. And that doesn't take into account the evil act undertaken to create the undead. That's a whole different can of worms.
Xerice Lockhart |
See them as redeemed evil doers ;)
Xerice Lockhart |
Wakey Wakey :).
Our Mysterious Benefactor |
Sorry, my bad. I got blindsided by a nasty head cold and spent a couple days in the loving embrace of Mother Ny-Quil. I feel more human now...
Xerice Lockhart |
Good to hear. What a pushover that manticore was :).
Zano Turok |
updated character, and loot to divide out since it was last divided.
potion of foxs cunning
130 gp
+1 humanoid shape changer bane dagger
from another area we got
unidentifyed short sword
waterskin full of wine
elixir of darkvision
then from a final area we got
31 pp and 23 gp
masterwork shortsword
magical oil
A flask full of brandy
ointment of body balm
Ezechias |
Can't we have someone take 10 on the identifies? A fully maxed int caster can usually do it easily.
As for Ezechias, he needs mainly some money to afford his full-plate, but he's still far from having enough money for it I think.
Caesare Montoya |
Caesare uses one of his detect magic to identify the items
Spellc: 1d20 + 1d6 + 12 ⇒ (20) + (1) + 12 = 33 Shortsword
Spellc: 1d20 + 1d6 + 12 ⇒ (11) + (3) + 12 = 26 Magical Oil
Spellc: 1d20 + 1d6 + 12 ⇒ (6) + (1) + 12 = 19 Ointment
Ezechias |
You can take 10 as long as you're in no hurry for a task. As for Knowledge checks, it usually is up to the GM to allow it or not.
Xerice Lockhart |
You roll your caster level plus a d20 to overcome SR.
Our Mysterious Benefactor |
On another note, Cireth has been absent since the first week of January. I checked his aliases and it seems consistent: no word since then. I sent him a PM, but if he's not checking Paizo.com, he won't see those.
Do we NPC him for now? Do we have him step off-screen? Do we seek a replacement? I'd like your input.
Caesare Montoya |
I have some problems with people going AWOL. Apart from that.
We have two very strong divine caster, a very strong martial paladin a very strong skill-user and a int-caster. We "should" be good.
Xerice Lockhart |
We have an int caster? You mean yourself?
I always like full wizards/sorcerers that do nifty spells. Not sure we need them, but I like them in the party. Especially around this level and higher. Lots of versatility.
Ezechias |
I'd leave him some extra time (until the end of the month, perhaps?), but yeah I'm with you on that one, people who are busy can always leave a note saying how are things for them.
If we're looking for a replacement, I'd also prefer a full arcane caster.
Our Mysterious Benefactor |
I'm not a fan of just dropping people because they disappear. You can never tell what happened in a person's life. However, I have no problem with allowing him to fade into the background; if Cireth comes back, he can rejoin. If not, we have a new player. I'm leaving the "whether or not we need a new player" question to you.