kyrt-ryder |
kyrt-ryder wrote:In that case, I'm leaning more Paladin lol.One thing to note: you need to play a female character. Gandel's goal is to be surrounded by hotties.
I'll think on it my friend, although I can already imagine all the jokes that are likely to happen considering his height with human sized females around lmao.
(Also, I saw your post, and replied, you guys have your next task ahead. And I'd like to think he wouldn't mind the minor threadjacks so long as we stay mostly on topic. And on that note... carry this discussion to our discussion thread lmao.)
UGH, so hard. Paladin, Bard, Paladin, Bard.
Maybe I should just roll a d2 and get it overwith...
kyrt-ryder |
kyrt-ryder wrote:I'll think on it my friend, although I can already imagine all the jokes that are likely to happen considering his height with human sized females around lmao.Exactly! All the more reason!
A party of all human-sized females and one gnome male? Gandel's life is looking up! ;-)
Well, there's plenty to see, but I'm not sure what he could accomplish, given the 'limitations of his race' ;) lmao
Sesinia |
Gandel wrote:Well, there's plenty to see, but I'm not sure what he could accomplish, given the 'limitations of his race' ;) lmaokyrt-ryder wrote:I'll think on it my friend, although I can already imagine all the jokes that are likely to happen considering his height with human sized females around lmao.Exactly! All the more reason!
A party of all human-sized females and one gnome male? Gandel's life is looking up! ;-)
OUCH!
kyrt-ryder |
Hmmmm, how's this (not these clothes of course, but this girl)
Paladin-ess of Sharess (FR goddess of lust and pleasure)
Work for you Max?
Sesinia |
Hmmmm, how's this (not these clothes of course, but this girl)
Paladin-ess of Sharess (FR goddess of lust and pleasure)
Work for you Max?
HAHAHA!
Tensility&Momentum |
Celestial Half-Porc wrote:kyrt-ryder wrote:Lets see, so far there's a cleric, a rogue, a bard, a ranger, and a sorceress right?You still in on this too? Possible Cleric???I was under the impression that T&M was playing a cleric.
Since we've got a bard, I wouldn't mind playing a monk I suppose. Or possibly a Paladin, either's cool with me.
Of course, I have to warn the guy running this thing, I have a propensity for very odd characters personality/backstory wise.
Yeah, I'm still on. I was cooling my heels waiting for a response from lordzack since I was rather confused about the composition of the party after his mention of the two "DM characters".
Anyway, for whatever it's worth, the cleric is also female and quite charismatic.
kyrt-ryder |
4d6 ⇒ (6, 4, 6, 4) = 204d6 ⇒ (4, 3, 4, 3) = 144d6 ⇒ (5, 6, 5, 6) = 224d6 ⇒ (3, 3, 1, 2) = 94d6 ⇒ (4, 4, 1, 5) = 144d6 ⇒ (3, 6, 1, 2) = 12
Sorry, just got frustrated dealing with the STUPID point buy (I've always despised progressively more expensive point buy systems) and I was curious what I'd get if I rolled lol.
No need to edit in the actual scores after this, since it's just a personal curiosity thing.
*sigh* the staggerred point buy blows, the only classes I could really be happy with are arcane casters, since they don't need good stats except an 18 in their casting trait and a minimum 12 in con. (Gnome sorcerer is starting to look reeeeeally good right about now)
Once Zack gets back to me with the availability/non-availability of 3.5 stuff I'll buckle down and get this built.
(Also, feel free to post into the Sandbox discussion thread Max and Porky, I'm still looking for feedback and some back and forth on our game)
lordzack |
Starting gold is per RAW.
As for you're concept T&M, it's interesting. I'll allow it, however the validity of you're character's beliefs are unlikely to be affirmed during the course of the game.
I may allow things outside of core on a case-by-case basis. But for one thing, the material from the upcoming Advanced Player's Guide playtests will be allowed.
Tensility&Momentum |
As for you're concept T&M, it's interesting. I'll allow it, however the validity of you're character's beliefs are unlikely to be affirmed during the course of the game.
I mainly created the concept because I was having a hard time coming up with a solid background for a Cleric given the lack of a well-defined pantheon.
I may allow things outside of core on a case-by-case basis. But for one thing, the material from the upcoming Advanced Player's Guide playtests will be allowed.
So, if you'll permit it, I'd like to wait for two days until the first installment of the APG playtest material is released, from which I'll make an Oracle character.
I know there's a relatively new cult of a fire deity/spirit led by an oracle of fire (as in the upcoming class).
If appropriate, then, I can be a member of the new Fire cult you mentioned earlier in the thread. Sound good?
Celestial Half-Porc |
Hey Michael, since I'm here might as well link this for kyrt.
This is the thread: Revised Pathfinder Sandbox Campaign!
Tensility&Momentum |
Now that the Oracle has been released, I've got to admit that it looks rather inferior to the Cleric; however, in the spirit of playtest, I'll go ahead and give it a shake anyway.
I might end up being something other than a Fire Oracle, if that's okay, but I don't yet have a strong lean towards any of them.
On the other hand, not that it's applicable for this character, really, but I do very much like the Cavalier class.
lordzack |
Alright, I'd like to get started. I don't want to have a lot of prelude before the action, so I'll just assume that the two characters of the two players that are dropping out have had to leave (and have already done so) and the two characters that are joining have just arrived and joined the group. The two characters that have yet to be created will show up when they are finished. Is that acceptable?
Sesinia |
Alright, I'd like to get started. I don't want to have a lot of prelude before the action, so I'll just assume that the two characters of the two players that are dropping out have had to leave (and have already done so) and the two characters that are joining have just arrived and joined the group. The two characters that have yet to be created will show up when they are finished. Is that acceptable?
Totally fine with me.
Tensility&Momentum |
Alright, I'd like to get started. I don't want to have a lot of prelude before the action, so I'll just assume that the two characters of the two players that are dropping out have had to leave (and have already done so) and the two characters that are joining have just arrived and joined the group. The two characters that have yet to be created will show up when they are finished. Is that acceptable?
Sounds appropriate.