Giant Gecko

Xenok's page

19 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


1 person marked this as a favorite.

"I knew skull had another Y in it." Travel to a dungeon to search for something that was never there (at least at first).

A gaggle of friends wandering about: Complete a session in a non-urban setting and encounter no monsters.


sadie wrote:
Juda de Kerioth wrote:


Also, could you add the new Sanity stat?
I'm still trying to work out how. It's only a little stat and some explanation, certainly not big enough for its own page, but it doesn't really fit anywhere on the other sheets either?

Since it is only an optional alternate ruleset, you could probably give it its own page (or half page) like you did for lycanthropy and those other things.

Just a thought.


Will we be able to apply corruptions to animal companions?


Okay, so which of you big old dragons ate the little guy who always announces the cover art updates?


The Mortonator wrote:
Xenok wrote:

My GM and I tend to ignore pointless words like that.

(Because seriously, how does it really alter any part of Vigilante Specialization?)

Because of a silly line of text describing it as part of Vigilante Specialization because you pick it at the same time.

Yea.

It's dumb.

Hence the reason we ignore it.


The Mortonator wrote:
Xenok wrote:

Has anyone else noticed that all the Vigilante talents the Wildsoul archetype replaces are the exact Vigilante talents that any of the spellcasting archetypes do not replace?

I think Paizo did that on purpose.

I have! Unfortunately, all of the casting archetypes besides Magical Child alter talents by adding new talents. There's no real precedent for that to be the case, but it is.

Not that it matters even if you are a Magical Child because of the most pointless words ever in an archetype.

Wildsoul wrote:
This alters vigilante specialization and replaces the vigilante talents gained at 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 18th levels.

My GM and I tend to ignore pointless words like that.

(Because seriously, how does it really alter any part of Vigilante Specialization?)


Has anyone else noticed that all the Vigilante talents the Wildsoul archetype replaces are the exact Vigilante talents that any of the spellcasting archetypes do not replace?

I think Paizo did that on purpose.


Hello again, I am sorry to bother you but I noticed that the Medium, Psychic, and Spiritualist downloads (and possibly the other Occult classes as well) are missing the inventory sheet. Just thought I would let you know.

Oh, and by the way, your Beta Vigilante sheet looks awesome. You are only missing a spot for the Vigilante Specialization. Otherwise, it's perfect.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Xenok wrote:


"I cast Summon Bigger Fish.": Use a Summon Monster/Summon Nature's Ally to summon an aquatic creature in a combat with no water.

This one needed a little tweak.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

"I love it when a plan comes together.": Secretly create a complex plan and have it actually work.

Invisible Leather TARDIS: Go through an entire campaign without calculating the weight of your load.

"Jar Jar, you are a genius.": As a PC with an INT score of 7 or lower, solve a puzzle that no one else could.

"I cast Summon Bigger Fish.": Use a Summon Monster/Summon Nature's Ally spell in an unusual way.

"THAT MEANS IT WILL BE EVEN LUCKIER NEXT TIME!": Roll 5 ones in a row on the same die.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Huzzah!


My Paladin was raised by a band of not-so-nefarious pirates after a Bodak transformed his small village into a ghost town when he was about six years old. As such, he is a pretty good swimmer and he tends to stretch the Paladin's code in some places.

He always tells the truth (though rarely the whole truth). If something registers as evil, it is usually dead within the next three to five minutes. If he needs to interrogate someone, he will usually do so by threatening their pets (this has only happened once however, and technically speaking the guy's "pets" were a pair of giant rats).

Oh, and he rides a gecko.


Will you be making an archetype sheet for the magical child?


Owen K. C. Stephens wrote:
Xenok wrote:
Hey Owen, if it is not too late could we please get more options for the "Form of the Dragon" spells. With all the new dragons Paizo has added over the years those spell have started to seem (at least to me) slightly outdated.
While it is past the time I could add a whole new set of options, it's safe to say we thought about that. :)

So will you think about it again sometime in the future?


Hey Owen, if it is not too late could we please get more options for the "Form of the Dragon" spells. With all the new dragons Paizo has added over the years those spell have started to seem (at least to me) slightly outdated.


Hello, I'd like to let you know that I love your sheets. My group and I have not used anything else since we discovered them about a year ago.

Something I would like to point out: On the phantom combat sheet, under armor class, there is a spot that says "evolutions" (which we both know phantoms do not get). You might want to fix that.

Thanks for all your hard work!


5 people marked this as a favorite.

How about a Spiritualist archetype where the phantom is your shadow?


"But he only rolls threes, so let's go the other way."

Context:
The party had just come to a fork in the dungeon, and the dwarf rogue (who consistently rolls poorly) suggested that they go to the left. Everyone agreed with him until the nagaji bloodrager said the above comment.


Hey Mark (and anyone else paying attention), I have a question about size bonuses. A few of my players think that if you are attacking or getting attacked by a creature the same size or smaller than you (example: a small creature attacking another small creature or a tiny creature), that you lose the size bonus to AC and attack. I don't know where they got this (or why they would even want this), because I looked through the Core Rulebook and I did not see any reason why a creature would lose their size bonuses.

Think you could help clear this up?