Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Worldbuilder's page

FullStarFullStarFullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 252 posts (647 including aliases). 5 reviews. 1 list. No wishlists. 16 Pathfinder Society characters. 2 aliases.



Sign in to create or edit a product review.

Our Price: $3.99

Add to Cart

Worst scenario I've ever seen

*( )( )( )( )

Worst scenario I have ever played. I just wrote a giant review and for some reason it didn't go through. I only played the scenario and have not read it. Not going to rewrite it so heres a paraphrase. All in all it comes down to:

A) We failed the mission on skill checks. They can either be Charisma skills (which I had extremely high for the level and still failed) or sleight of hand checks. GM hand Waived it (after a lot of time was wasted) so we could continue the scenario.
B) Sorcerer with 5 color sprays nearly TPK'd the party, but I ran.
C) Had to use survival checks to find a merchant in the market.

It was just a bunch of stuff that didn't make sense with no way to continue after failing. By far the worst scenario I've ever played, with only one coming in a close second.

That said, if it didn't have so many idiotic things (such as a survival check for what is clearly a Gather Information check) it actually had some good RP encounters. If they had changed a few things around it may be enjoyable.


Our Price: $3.99

Add to Cart

Horrible!!

*( )( )( )( )

Potential Spoilers: This was a nasty one for me. I don't get to play much anymore because of life. Spent pretty much the entire scenario KO'd(from failed saving throws). I had to retreat from the wisp battle, and the party didn't come and get me before the final battle so I participated in exactly 2(running, and then DDoor, so nothing even fun) rounds of combat the entire scenario. The wisps may have been fine, but I never thought they'd float away, and the 40 damage per wisp per turn was to much for my PC. The beginning part was slow as I think the party faces were a little slow in the RP department. All in all it was almost 6 hours of boredom and pain, and being my first play in over a month was highly disappointing.

Note: And whats up with this Boon...I got it,but its pretty OP'd...I hope Paizo tones these season 4 boons down some. Boons should be nice small little bonuses, not crazy power increases, especially if your a monostat character.


Add Print Edition: $19.99

Add PDF: $13.99

Add Non-Mint: $19.99 $14.99

Horrible final battle again

**( )( )( )

A really fun adventure all the way through, though unfortunately my party actually got stuck on this one for a bit, and needed some coddling. Like the last book, the final battle is a huge let down, and very poorly designed. This actually would have been the end of my game, as the boss has a DC 21 save or die, and everyone in the party failed but the ranger. I ruled it to put the party at -1 and dying instead and ran the battle as is. After loosing 2 party members(half the party) the other half did manage to beat him still. It was just such a poorly designed encounter that's sole purpose is to insta-kill PC's. After that we all lost heart on the series (technically the only person who made it without fudging was the animal companion) and we dropped the campaign. He Could easily end the whole campaign with 1-2 save or dies he has, and after he burns through those he has nothing else left. I highly recommend rewriting the final battle of this campaign to be more thematic.

P.S. My game is a 25 point build with bonus powers and all players are power gamers. The guy with the best chance only had a 40% chance of making the save.

P.S.S. I have recently thought about bringing this game back. When I started talking about it with a buddy it just made me so sad to think about I decided to can it. May run book 4-6 (already have everything in map tools) when it becomes sanctioned for PFS.


Add Print Edition: $19.99

Add PDF: $13.99

Add Non-Mint: $19.99 $14.99

Great all the way until the end

****( )

Has very strong roleplay and hack and slash elements. Both sides of my group enjoyed it, until the end. The fina; battle is a huge let down, as is the battle in book 3. I use map tools, so I'm mostly just programming stuff in, and if its really horrible I usually notice when I'm running it;) It looses an entire star because the boss battle is not very well designed, and effectively makes the PCs cheerleaders. Anyway, if I could do anything over, it would be the boss battles of book 2 and 3, and rewrite them myself.


Add Print Edition: $19.99

Add PDF: $13.99

Add Non-Mint: $19.99 $14.99

Severe Let down

*( )( )( )( )

Wow, all I can say is that this book was a bummer. Probably an ok resource if you are running a very low level campaign, but I have no problem stating third level characters, and the free resources on the web make it even easier. There are about two characters I can use in my game. I would recommend not wasting your money;)



©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.