|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
the acting out or performance of a particular role, either consciously (as a technique in psychotherapy or training) or unconsciously, in accordance with the perceived expectations of society with regard to a person's behavior in a particular context.
Players do that every time they speak in character and say something that their player wouldn't say in that same situation.
Rogue Druid: Have a druid with a high int score, take the traits and skills to do the traditionally roguesh things like stealth and disable device. Size bonuses in wildshape make your stealth absurd, earth elementals and animals allow for a great deal of scouting.
Tiny foxform fighter: Mine's a Vexing dodger rogue 4 Mouser swashbuckler 1 Urban barbarian 2 sacred fist Warpriest of Gorum 1: Absurd stealth and acrobatics for mobility, walks into peoples squares and starts sneak attacking with a claw claw bite routine. There are a lot of combat advantages to being tiny. (many drawbacks too) but its very funny when the "useless familiar" with a giant pink bow that reads "this end towards enemy" hops off and is an actual tank thanks to the mouser abilities
Paladin shadowdancer: The shadowdancer fills in some nice skills that the paladin is missing, and a shadow thing with a butload of hitpoints is pretty dangerous on its own, and shadowdancer adds some much needed mobility to whats usually a melee class.
My highschools a literal stones throw from NYMA.
The kids were a mix of military brats who wanted to get into west point, rich parents who's kids needed babysitters, and future violent offenders of america trying to stay out of juvie.
So not that much different than most other schools. The difference being that with the uniforms you never knew which roving pack of students you were dealing with until it was too late.
The Libertarian party strikes me as a fundamentally good idea taken to fundamentally irrational extremes. :P
The Libertarian party: Lets not intervene for anyone.
The republican party: Lets have government intervention for the rich and say we're not having intervention for anyone.
The Democratic party: Lets have a lot of government intervention for the rich and a little bit for the poor and say we're only intervening for the poor.
I think the Republican voters also have just as many awkward divisions, but the leadership and propaganda arms of the right just do a better job of keeping them unified. The last couple of primaries though have shown that some of those tensions are becoming more apparent.
The republicans are more awkwardly split.
The entire point of the republican party is to push none of the taxes and all of the government services to the .01%. You can't win an election if you admit that though. (Say on a hidden recording from Jimmy Carters Grandkid)
In order to get the other 49% of the country they need to win they advocate
-White evangelical christianity
Some of these work together. If you cast doubt on science you help young earth evangelicals as well as the fossil fuel industry. When in doubt you cry "State's rights!" and let the state discriminate against people.
Some of them don't. Having the war on drugs because drugs are bad and restricting abortion don't work with libertarians.
Democrats aren't nearly as enthused but do work together, or tend not to work at odds. You have
minorities (because when a big part of the one parties strategy is
social justice types
These work together or at the very least don't oppose each other. For most people, if you can empathize with the fact that a panda bear is dying out and needs government intervention to save their home you can empathize enough with a human being when they say their habbitat is FUBARed enough to rewquire government intervention: or you're far enough out in the woods not to care.
I think most of them had a "it's good enough to last a fee decades and then they'll redo it" view of the constitution...
Alex Blaes wrote:
Two Weapon Fighting has no interaction with natural attacks, barring the usual -X to attacks (an additional -2 in the case of a character with TWF).
If you wield a second weapon in your off hand, you can get one extra attack per round with that weapon. You suffer a –6 penalty with your regular attack or attacks with your primary hand and a –10 penalty to the attack with your off hand when you fight this way. You can reduce these penalties in two ways. First, if your off-hand weapon is light, the penalties are reduced by 2 each. An unarmed strike is always considered light. Second, the Two-Weapon Fighting feat lessens the primary hand penalty by 2, and the off-hand penalty by 6.
Two weapon penalties specifically apply the penalty to attacks with your off hand. YOur natural weapons are unaffected (since you can't use the same hand twice anyway)
Lefthandpunch righthandpunch Bite is at -2 -2 -5.
I underestimated the hot rock massage, but the correct analogy wouldn't be allowed on an open forum...
a thousand bucks on hillary if they do that...
I can't help but get a little nervous hearing everyone call this the "Final" or "Last" debate. I know they mean of this election, but I can't help but feel like we will be looking back on these times wondering what the hell happened, as we cook mutant dog parts over a burning pair of sneakers...
And its being run by fox. I keep expecting it to be called "the benghazi email debate" while trumps getting hot rock massages
Damn. i realize it's Donald trump but thats LOW man. Really low...
Obviously this is to throw him off his game tonight
It should be a dunk tank, with the person that asked the question given 3 softballs they can use if the candidate goes off topic.
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
as long as the law gets passed or the judge gets appointed i don't care.
They can overturn decisions you know...
Thomas Seitz wrote:
I'm pretty sure some of my southern part of the state brethren identify Hillary as a "Coal killing b~#*! with billions" and Trump as "The guy that will get us our jobs!"
That looks hard to fit on the ballot...
That would be like identifying Trump as "the orange one" or hillary as "the female"
His name is Hisskanagths , and he needs your vote to make america reptilian again.