| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Future proofing?
Future proofing.
Never mind.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
As the others have said its so that as the years go on kobolds don't accidentally get locked out of stuff that they clearly should have access to. Nobody puts our lil dragon buddies in a corner.
Never mind.
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
...so what you're saying here is you didn't actually want to hear the answer? You understand that Paizo is going to print new books, right?
Wait, these are your only posts you've ever made. You really want to spend your time trolling over this, dude?
Man people really will find any reason to get upset.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I expect better from Paizo. I didn't buy this book to get references in it to things that MIGHT exist in the future,, I bought it for the content it has now, and it is quite frankly either missing content or includes allusions to content that simply was not going to exist.
Where did you get your information that the content is simply not going to exist? If you're just making that up, then you're in the same position as the people think it is future proofing.
You believe they either made an error, or they are gaslighting you. Other people believe it's neither a mistake nor mental cruelty.
Reality is that there is a reference to something that does not currently exist. You have a choice: tell yourself a story that makes you feel bad, or tell yourself a story that makes you feel good.
But it's all in your head: whatever emotions you want to feel, you get to choose.
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Throwing insults just because you don't like the answers doesn't change the answers.
This wasn't an oops, it's been a goal (one that's already born fruit) to be better about future proofing so that future options don't make broken or awkward situations when interacting with previous options.
No it’s future proofing to prevent headaches later, this isn’t the first instance they’ve done something like this for this edition, keeps everything smooth as they release new options."It's future proofing!" AKA "Oops, we forgot, let's say it was intentional for stuff coming in the future"
They forgot they were suppose to add more snares to the book, or a list of what current snares are considered kobold snares, or they didn't have time. If you and others are comfortable making excuses for it and feel better explaining it away with 'future proofing' bollox, thats fine. I expect better from Paizo. I didn't buy this book to get references in it to things that MIGHT exist in the future,, I bought it for the content it has now, and it is quite frankly either missing content or includes allusions to content that simply was not going to exist.
As the others have said ....I'm not drinking the 'future proofing' cool-aid, thanks.
Are you unaware of the future proofing text in every classes weapon specialization class features? Or that some of the Gods in God's and Magic granted spells that didn't exist until the APG?
It's not a mistake and there isn't any flavoraid to drink, thanks.
Man people really will find any reason to get upset.
New book launches are a gold mine for this stuff, it's great.
Never mind.
Man people really will find any reason to get upset.
To be clear, I wasn't upset by the missing content, I was just asking to see if I was missing something. I was frustrated by the responses to the post and I do not suffer foolishness gladly.
And again, just because you don't like the answers doesn't make them wrong or "foolish".
I have a response to that....
(But this post is just future proofing that response so I'll write it down later.)
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Man people really will find any reason to get upset.To be clear, I wasn't upset by the missing content, I was just asking to see if I was missing something. I was frustrated by the responses to the post and I do not suffer foolishness gladly.
Who hurt you?
What's the point of this thread?
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I have a response to that....
(But this post is just future proofing that response so I'll write it down later.)
The future only lasts an hour, and you missed the window.