
messy |

rather than sort through 18,034 matches (seriously) to the search "vital strike," i'd rather start another thread. :-)
which other feats is vital strike compatible with? power attack? combat expertise? improved feint? whirlwind attack?
is there a rule of thumb for making this clear?

Sniggevert |

PA? Yes
CE? Yes
IF? No
WW? No
Rule of thumb, if the feat you're trying to add indicates it takes an action to do (i.e. move action for improved feint, full round for whirlwind, standard for cleave), then it can not be combined with the Vital Strike chain. Vital Strike can pretty much only be used when you the regular standard action from the combat chapter to use the "Attack" action.

666bender |
Viral strike is amazing .... For some.
Here are some tactical use , by class:
A fighter will want it combined with felling smash, greater trip and vicious stomp ( with one dip of monk). You move fully, attack hard once >>triggering trip>>>and 2 AOO . All with full bab. Amazing really. Only fighter has enough feats for it.
A barbarian will want it for the feat if full damage .
A Druid want it with string jaw for one hit kills.
3/4 divinne caster with enlarged great sword want it as attack 2 will miss

messy |

PA? Yes
CE? Yes
IF? No
WW? NoRule of thumb, if the feat you're trying to add indicates it takes an action to do (i.e. move action for improved feint, full round for whirlwind, standard for cleave), then it can not be combined with the Vital Strike chain. Vital Strike can pretty much only be used when you the regular standard action from the combat chapter to use the "Attack" action.
can you use vital strike for the attack that follows the feint action used with improved feint?

Sniggevert |

Rule of thumb for Vital Strike: If you have to ask, the answer is probably no.
messy: Improved Feint takes a move action, Vital Strike takes a standard. So, yes.
Yeah, sorry in my rush I didn't think that one out, but yes taking a standard attack after an improved feint is fine to use vital strike with.

TheBulletKnight |

After moving, you may make a single melee attack...
When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...
The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?

JimmySC |

rather than sort through 18,034 matches (seriously) to the search "vital strike," i'd rather start another thread. :-)
which other feats is vital strike compatible with? power attack? combat expertise? improved feint? whirlwind attack?
is there a rule of thumb for making this clear?
Vital Strike requires that you take an Attack action, and basically modifies how Attack actions work. The Attack action is not the same thing as making a melee attack, although it can be a type of melee attack if you use it to attack with a melee weapon. So the rule of thumb is Vital Strike only functions when taking a specific type of action called the Attack action.
Power Attack & Combat Expertise modify all melee attacks that you make from the beginning of your round until the start of your next round, and require no action to activate, so you would still be able to take the Attack action and Vital Strike with them. Improved Feint requires a move action to use, but simply specifies your next attack, so an Attack Action and Vital Strike would be able to benefit from it. Whirlwind Attack modifies the Full-attack action; because Vital Strike only works with Attack actions and not Full-attack actions, it would not modify Whirlwind Attack.
Along similar lines, Cleave requires that you take a standard action to make a melee attack, which is a type of melee attack but is not the Attack action. For an example of something that does work with Vital Strike - the Overhand Chop ability of a two-handed fighter applies when the fighter makes a single attack (with either the attack action or a charge), so it would apply when using the Attack action and Vital Strike.

RainyDayNinja RPG Superstar 2014 Top 16, RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16 |

CRB wrote:After moving, you may make a single melee attack...CRB wrote:When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?
The "attack action" is a specifically-defined standard action in the Combat section of the CRB. It does not refer to just any old attack you make.

Sniggevert |

CRB wrote:After moving, you may make a single melee attack...CRB wrote:When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?
No, charge is a full round action. It grants a single attack at the end of the movement part, but it is part of the overall full round action to charge.

Thomas Long 175 |
CRB wrote:After moving, you may make a single melee attack...CRB wrote:When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?
The attack action is separate from getting an attack.
Charge gives you a single attack.
The attack action is its own standard action, listed in the Core rules. This has already been FAQ'd and has been stated by the DEV's that it does not work.

JimmySC |

CRB wrote:After moving, you may make a single melee attack...CRB wrote:When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?
This may help, from the FAQ for the CRB:
Vital Strike: Can I use this with Spring Attack, or on a charge?
No. Vital Strike can only be used as part of an attack action, which is a specific kind of standard action. Spring Attack is a special kind of full-round action that includes the ability to make one melee attack, not one attack action. Charging uses similar language and can also not be used in combination with Vital Strike.

![]() |

Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack.
They are the same thing.
Standard ActionsMost of the common actions characters take, aside from movement, fall into the realm of standard actions.
ATTACK
Making an attack is a standard action.
^ That one.
The "attack action" is the standard action named "Attack" in the list of standard actions in the Combat chapter.
The attack action is one way to make an attack. The charge action is another. The full-attack action is yet another. But just because they all let you make an attack doesn't make them all the attack action. The attack action is a standard action that is one of the means to get an attack.

Pupsocket |

CRB wrote:After moving, you may make a single melee attack...CRB wrote:When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?
The attack action. Specific, singular. Not an attack action. And that means it refers to the standard action called "Attack".

Nicos |
TheBulletKnight wrote:The "attack action" is a specifically-defined standard action in the Combat section of the CRB. It does not refer to just any old attack you make.CRB wrote:After moving, you may make a single melee attack...CRB wrote:When you use the attack action, you can make one attack at your highest base attack bonus that deals additional damage...The charge action for an attack, as above, says you make a single melee attack. Vital strike only says when you use the attack action, not when you use a standard action to attack. And as far as I can tell, since it only asks for the attack action, isn't the single attack as part of a charge an attack action?
It was not so clear cut defined. There was a big thread about sunder as attack vs sunder as standar action.
Only the FAQ resolved the charge + vital strike thing.

Cheapy |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

The Sunder thread was due to ambiguity in the Sunder rules themselves. It mistakenly said that it could be made "as part of an attack action in place of a melee attack", when the "attack action" bit shouldn't have been said. FAQ
Developer commentary:
One Jason
Two Jason
Three (basically Stephen saying what Jiggy just said) Stephen
Four Jason

![]() |

Vital Strike works with Cleave...badly...
check out the feat All-Consuming Swing.
Except it doesn't, because Cleave is called out in the feat as its own standard action, not an attack action.
**EDIT** Also, that feat doesn't appear to exist anywhere. Just checked the Paizo PRD and the d20pfsrd sites, no hits on either.

![]() |

ohako wrote:Vital Strike works with Cleave...badly...
check out the feat All-Consuming Swing.
Except it doesn't, because Cleave is called out in the feat as its own standard action, not an attack action.
**EDIT** Also, that feat doesn't appear to exist anywhere. Just checked the Paizo PRD and the d20pfsrd sites, no hits on either.
Here it is: The Harrow Handbook.
In this case, yes Vital Strike can be used with Cleave because there is a feat that specifically states that it can be done.

![]() |

Ssalarn wrote:ohako wrote:Vital Strike works with Cleave...badly...
check out the feat All-Consuming Swing.
Except it doesn't, because Cleave is called out in the feat as its own standard action, not an attack action.
**EDIT** Also, that feat doesn't appear to exist anywhere. Just checked the Paizo PRD and the d20pfsrd sites, no hits on either.
Here it is: The Harrow Handbook.
In this case, yes Vital Strike can be used with Cleave because there is a feat that specifically states that it can be done.
Wow, that is a brutally expensive feat for that ability.

![]() |

Wow, that is a brutally expensive feat for that ability.
The feat tax, itself, is no big deal because you would need those feats anyways.
What would give me pause, and I imagine what you're referring to, is the damage one would take to use the feat. I guess we can't get everything for free? o.O

![]() |

Ok. I'd seen so many threads that said 'how's the math on my charging cavalier?',that people didn't say anything was wrong with the fact that vital strike and its better forms were added into the math, I thought it was ok.
That was changed fairly recently via FAQ. And even then, it wasn't that Charge and Vital Strike worked, it was that the separation of action economy between mount and rider had the mount charging and the rider still retaining his complement of actions. Now, both have to spend a charge action.

messy |

If it says something along the lines of "If you take the attack action", "When using the attack action", "by taking an attack action", then you can add Vital Strike to it, because using the Attack Action is what causes Vital Strike to activate.
so since flurry of blows is "a full-attack action," vital strike doesn't work with it, correct?
on the other hand, two-weapon fighting uses no language at all about what type of action it is. so does vital strike work with two-weapon fighting?
what about multiple natural attacks? do they work with vital strike?

Saigo Takamori |

I will excuse myself, but Vital Strike is quite bad as feat. Unless you have some character who can't full attack (gunner without being a Gunslinger, for example), it's not really good. For that, I simply decided to make it applicable everytime you only attack one time per round (Charge, spring attack, etc...).

![]() |

Two Weapon fighting is a Full Attack action. EoS.
The majority of the time to get more than a single attack will require a full attack action. Any other time that alows you to get multiple attacks as a standard action is a standard action and not applicable to use with VS.
Vital Strike works with Greater Weapon of the Chosen.

Avoron |
"If you get more than one attack per round because your base attack bonus is high enough (see Base Attack Bonus in Classes), because you fight with two weapons or a double weapon, or for some special reason, you must use a full-round action to get your additional attacks."
You can never use Vital Strike when attacking as a full-round action.
The only time you can use Vital Strike is if you use a standard action to perform "The Attack Action."
If other feats or effects require actions other than The Attack Action, then those do not work in conjunction with Vital Strike. If other feats or effects allow you to perform a special action that allows an attack, then those do not work in conjunction with Vital Strike.
If other feats don't require a particular actions to use, or the action they require is The Attack Action, then those do work in conjunction with Vital Strike.