The alignments i think i'm are: Chaotic Neutral,True Neutral,Neutral Good and either Chaotic Evil or
Neutral Evil.
I don't really trust anyone or anything at all because they all tend to oppress my freedom to do whatever i want to do which is what i long for and really only care about despite seeming like i don't. I also can be really lazy when it comes to everything and anything. I believe that good and bad are subjective as what one person views as good another will view as bad etc. For example: I slept with my good friend who is dating someone at the moment
some will consider me evil because of this or Neutral, however he offered to do it with me when i brought it up in a conversation one night and then he changed his mind while doing it with me so i stopped due to him changing his mind. I was so enjoying it until he stopped and since then i've been upset with him. So
because i sensed that he was gonna kill the enjoyment for me somehow, afterwards and still am irritated that he backed out. I also have gone and sold a christmas present after being told not to for money, because i was craving Popcorn at the time. I also for the longest time made it out to look like i forgave my mom but really i went over to her place with her current lover to eat and so she can't say that i don't see her at all.
I will always respect her for bringing me into this world but don't trust her.
I also believe that people should be free to do whatever they want, however whatever they end up doing with that freedom is on them to deal with not me.
I don't use violence but don't consider myself a pacifist because if i could find a way to use it with my lack of upper body strength i would.
I also don't like being told no but tend to swallow my feelings about the issue and pretend like i don't.
Edit:Which alignment or alignments do you think you are? and which of them is this OP?
You're not remotely evil, unless you specifically enjoy or engineer the suffering of others. You might not care what people do, but you aren't out to destroy them for fun or profit.
I have always thought of myself as LN with both the good and evil subtypes, but that's more a joke about my GMing style. I think I am LN, aspiring to "any good" as the condition necessitates. I believe in law and order, including a divinely mandated morality, but I also believe dogma hampers mercy and grace, which are paramount. However, I only aspire to be good, and my sinful, selfish nature sometimes wins out.
I think these discussions are cool. I get tired of people complaining about an alignment system instead of looking at its merits or the facts that there are overlap and tendencies in every person. Get busted making out with my teenage daughter and I change from LG Expert to CN barbarian.
Spoiler:
Note, this is conjecture. I have not actually hurt a teenage boy. Yet.
You're not remotely evil, unless you specifically enjoy or engineer the suffering of others. You might not care what people do, but you aren't out to destroy them for fun or profit.
I have always thought of myself as LN with both the good and evil subtypes, but that's more a joke about my GMing style. I think I am LN, aspiring to "any good" as the condition necessitates. I believe in law and order, including a divinely mandated morality, but I also believe dogma hampers mercy and grace, which are paramount. However, I only aspire to be good, and my sinful, selfish nature sometimes wins out.
I think these discussions are cool. I get tired of people complaining about an alignment system instead of looking at its merits or the facts that there are overlap and tendencies in every person. Get busted making out with my teenage daughter and I change from LG Expert to CN barbarian.
** spoiler omitted **
Are you talking about the OP or the other guy? and if the OP isn't an evil alignment, then which Neutral alignment is it then?
@ElyasRavenwood posting links to quizzes takes away from its original intents, i would've posted quizzes if i wanted them here but i do not. This is for individuals to discuss their alignments based on their knowledge of themselves and to give it a shot as to what the OP is or might be according to them.
I do not want to click the links, if you are too lazy to guess the OP just say it already ha ha.
I don;t see anything evil in the OP. Let's say the OP plots habitually to sleep with people or physically to hurt them because that's an acceptable price to pay (like currency) for getting what s/he wants, or because s/he gets as much as the pain they cause as the pleasure they receive. That's evil. Maybe that person gets a charge out of corrupting or breaking the spirits of others - evil. Just selfishly not trusting people out of a disappointed sense of entitlement and getting one's frowney face on because they prefer instant gratification over the inconvenience they place on others strikes me as a few descriptive words, but evil isn't one of them.
I'd also say the subject of motivation comes up. This anonymous person probably has poor self-esteem, is not motivated and lacks accountability. A little help providing those things might help that person realize that by working hard and putting yourself in position to give, you get a lot more satisfaction out of life.
I don;t see anything evil in the OP. Let's say the OP plots habitually to sleep with people or physically to hurt them because that's an acceptable price to pay (like currency) for getting what s/he wants, or because s/he gets as much as the pain they cause as the pleasure they receive. That's evil. Maybe that person gets a charge out of corrupting or breaking the spirits of others - evil. Just selfishly not trusting people out of a disappointed sense of entitlement and getting one's frowney face on because they prefer instant gratification over the inconvenience they place on others strikes me as a few descriptive words, but evil isn't one of them.
I'd also say the subject of motivation comes up. This anonymous person probably has poor self-esteem, is not motivated and lacks accountability. A little help providing those things might help that person realize that by working hard and putting yourself in position to give, you get a lot more satisfaction out of life.
TN? CN?
Interesting.
and LN leaning Good or even LG with a huge lean towards Law fits you like a glove for sure in my opinion.
Wow. This ended up longer than I thought it would. Let me be kind.
dissertation:
You dont trust authority and there was almost not a single thing in your post that struck me as altruistic so I'm gonna say the op is by and large chaotic neutral.
Astrology has some parallels to how I work out my own alignment anymore.
The sun sign (the one in the newspaper) is supposed to represent what you are. For me thats cancer: Caring, cautious, emotional.
The moon sign is what you are deep down (what you'd like to be or what you'd gravitate to if there were no consequence to it). For me thats leo: flamboyant confident regal and adored.
The rising sign (what hour you were born) represents the 'face' you put on for others. Scorpio: determined, intense, passionate and/or angry.
When I apply these concepts to alignment I find that
I'm actually chaotic neutral. Always have been. Probably always will be.
I'd like to be neutral good. Less rebellious, more generous and less selfish.
(not likely in todays economy but if I won the powerball I feel deep down that making the switch to neutral good would be as easy as flipping a switch. I feel like I'm only selfish because i've spent 40 years on the losing end of capitalism... Since i'm not religious I don't believe anyone looks out for my best interests but me so I don't waste time looking out for anyone's best interest but my own, but I'm as generous as I can be given my circumstances and would be much more so if I didn't feel like the rug could be pulled out from under me at any moment...) One part of my deep real neutral is there are rules that I follow because I think they are good an honorable rules, and get upset when I see others with no regard for those rules. The other neutral part of me basically says I acknowledge that rules I may not agree with are important and i'd try harder to follow them if I thought anybody around me put any effort into following them. They basically don't, so why should I bother. The only reason I follow the rules is because I've felt the whip of not doing so too often, but I still rail against it nonetheless and get quite upset when I see others succeeding despite breaking rules, or succeding BY breaking the rules, or succeed by making a set of rules that only helps themselves to be successful.
The 'face' I put on for society is neutral good. I wish the world were more like what I wish I were more like and I feel like the only way to get the world around me to be better is to set a higher standard. I want to appear more generous which helps me to actually 'become' more generous, and I want to appear to care about doing things right which in effect makes me do the right thing more often than i would, all in the hopes that it will inspire the world around me to be more neutral good, which I don't believe it is.
To summarize I think I'm truly neutral good, but the world makes me chaotic neutral and I wish it wouldnt. I will never truly make it to 'lawful' either on the surface or deep down because I'll never trust the rules others make more than the rules I make for myself. If everyone followed my rules I'd be lawful but I'm wise enough to know they don't, won't, and don't want to. More specifically even if they were able to admit that they don't follow my rules they'd never agree that my rules are better than the rules they set for themselves. Its that inescapable personl bias.
Most of society agrees there should be speed limits to increase safety on the roads. Most people don't follow those speed limits ever. Even the law 'where a person going slower than me should get out of my way' isnt the kind of law everyone would agree to and even if they could there'd only be a microscopic percentage of the population that would actually do it.
Alignment is a personal thing, but for me personalIy I don't think it exists as an island, and even after 40 years I still dont think I can truly be the kind of person I want to be in a world that doesnt value that kind of person. At the very least the 'vicinity' of my own personal world experience doesnt value it. Grumble grumble. Snarl snarl.
I could as easily have put on a chaotic evil 'face' since the world makes me feel like you cant be rewarded for being neutral good and every rule is both arbitrary and set to give the advantage to whoever sets the rule, so hang it all, rules be damned, me me me. It just isnt how I role I guess but I'd point out that this can and does happen. It's a completely legitimate way to resolve the third tier...
As a player my CN really shines since I put no stock in hardass Lawful GMs since their houserules are typically only for their benefit and rarely influence my gaming experience in a positive way. The second I hear 'at this table what the GM says goes because he's the GM and that's the way it is' is usually my first clue to find another table. I tend to only game at close knit tables who share my views or at least comprimise to a satisfactory degree. My world view and my game table view are the same "Lawful only works if everyone agrees on the laws".
On a side note my characters reflect this as well. I put CN on my character sheet but I tend to play them NG. In game I have the freedom to behave the way I think people ought to, but at the same time i'd hate to be held to that higher standard when the gm looks at my character sheet. As Alice would say, "Curiouser and curiouser!"... Funny that.
The alignments i think i'm are: Chaotic Neutral,True Neutral,Neutral Good and either Chaotic Evil or
Neutral Evil.
From what I can tell your alignment is Seriously Undersocialised. I can relate because I've struggled with that problem myself. And we modern Americans are probably more susceptible to this than most other cultures.
Here's why alignment doesn't work in the real world. People are not unified patterns of thought the popular paradigm is that the inside of your mind is minature puppetmaster that serves as a master controller. And while it's a popular picture, it's completely wrong. As psychology has developed one of it's key discoveries is that many disorders are exaggerations of mormal mental processes. There's actually an episode of "Fairly Odd Parents" that gives a better picture of this than most.
Instead of a puppet master, your mind is more like a corporate boardroom full of contentious directors each with it's own viewpoint and agenda, and occasionally they operate at cross purposes. What we call a healthy unified mind is the same thing that a corporate board presents to the outside world, a convincing facade of unity for public consumption. Some people however have problems maintaining that facade of unity. Among the results of that breakdown are things such as multiple personality disorder and schizophrenia.
Real living people are too complex to describe in terms of alignment. What you label them by are from the small circumscribed bits of interaction, while the observations may be useful, they are more in the term of that classic parable of three blind men describing an elephant.
I've always thought law and chaos were the wrong concepts. What DnD/Pathfinder operate on are disciplined and undisciplined concepts in my opinion.
Lawful evil people aren't lawful, House Thrune in Cheliax didn't come to power by lawful means, the came to power through discipline, careful planning, and willful disregard at times for the Law.
The alignments i think i'm are: Chaotic Neutral,True Neutral,Neutral Good and either Chaotic Evil or
Neutral Evil.
From what I can tell your alignment is Seriously Undersocialised. I can relate because I've struggled with that problem myself. And we modern Americans are probably more susceptible to this than most other cultures.
Here's why alignment doesn't work in the real world. People are not unified patterns of thought the popular paradigm is that the inside of your mind is minature puppetmaster that serves as a master controller. And while it's a popular picture, it's completely wrong. As psychology has developed one of it's key discoveries is that many disorders are exaggerations of mormal mental processes. There's actually an episode of "Fairly Odd Parents" that gives a better picture of this than most.
Instead of a puppet master, your mind is more like a corporate boardroom full of contentious directors each with it's own viewpoint and agenda, and occasionally they operate at cross purposes. What we call a healthy unified mind is the same thing that a corporate board presents to the outside world, a convincing facade of unity for public consumption. Some people however have problems maintaining that facade of unity. Among the results of that breakdown are things such as multiple personality disorder and schizophrenia.
Real living people are too complex to describe in terms of alignment. What you label them by are from the small circumscribed bits of interaction, while the observations may be useful, they are more in the term of that classic parable of three blind men describing an elephant.
Okay, well the alignment system makes alot more sense then the Bible and anything similar to it.
First of all, I kind of like the D&D alignment system as a simplistic way to describe personal ethics and morality.
In many ways, it's akin to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for ethics and morality: it's pretty descriptive, but it's also easy to read too much into it. People are more complex than a letter-code and how their typical behavior falls on different axes. At the same time, it can tell you something about yourself.
That said, from what the OP describes about himself, I'd peg him as Chaotic Neutral.
As for me, any gamer who knows me would agree that I'm Lawful Good.
Okay, well the alignment system makes alot more sense then the Bible and anything similar to it.
Even as an atheist, I have a strong problem with that statement. It implies that you have a very narrow reductionist, superficial view of the world and the people around you. And if you've actually READ a Bible, you don't seem to have bothered to understand it much, or the contexts in which various parts of it were written over the centuries.
What you fail to understand is that alignment was built as a wargaming mechanic to determine what kind of units you could put together for a wargaming board army. It's roleplaying features are of secondary function and not really meant to be looked over with an electron microscope. Take any popular character of any real depth and you'll get equally convincing arguments for multiple alignments which may be more than one step from each other... because people ARE that complex.
Alignment is a crappy way of describing any character that's got more depth than an Ayn Rand cipher.
Okay, well the alignment system makes alot more sense then the Bible and anything similar to it.
Even as an atheist, I have a strong problem with that statement. It implies that you have a very narrow reductionist, superficial view of the world and the people around you. And if you've actually READ a Bible, you don't seem to have bothered to understand it much, or the contexts in which various parts of it were written over the centuries.
What you fail to understand is that alignment was built as a wargaming mechanic to determine what kind of units you could put together for a wargaming board army. It's roleplaying features are of secondary function and not really meant to be looked over with an electron microscope. Take any popular character of any real depth and you'll get equally convincing arguments for multiple alignments which may be more than one step from each other... because people ARE that complex.
Alignment is a crappy way of describing any character that's got more depth than an Ayn Rand cipher.
Alright. Well i tried reading the bible once and i just couldn't bring myself to read anymore and as far as my views go. Um i do not have to conform and become a copycat if i do not want too. Just because you decide to not believe in a god and read through the bible does not mean i have to conform and copy everything you do sir. And i know this alignment system was designed for something originally but i decided to believe in it, so you are allowed to believe we evolved from an ape? or that an explosion happened and we just came to be but how dare i choose to not conform and believe in something else? uh whats with the double standards? why am i denied my right to choose Lazar?
First of all, I kind of like the D&D alignment system as a simplistic way to describe personal ethics and morality.
Exactly.
In many ways, it's akin to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for ethics and morality: it's pretty descriptive, but it's also easy to read too much into it. People are more complex than a letter-code and how their typical behavior falls on different axes. At the same time, it can tell you something about yourself.
Excellent.
That said, from what the OP describes about himself, I'd peg him as Chaotic Neutral.
Fantastic.
As for me, any gamer who knows me would agree that I'm Lawful Good.
Seeing your response on the atheist who defends the sensibility of the Bible (at last as a moral treatise), I'd have to say this exercise has brought you more than enough attention. When the post was about a blank slate with a few character flaws, it was a potentially interesting discussion about alignment mechanics vs real world ethics and how we all might see them. Your response about the Bible clearly indicates you want to pick a fight. First you bring the Bible into a conversation for the purpose of comparing it to a roleplaying mechanic, then you type a long response declaring that you don't have to read it if you don't want to. We know that already. That doesn't change its merits, whether historical, ethical or theological (I am fully bought into all three). What's your real purpose? To have strangers further define you, or to tempt comments from well-meaning respondents and then argue with their posts?
I hope you've learned something about yourself and I hope you gain greater depth of character and are pleased with the result.
The alignments i think i'm are: Chaotic Neutral,True Neutral,Neutral Good and either Chaotic Evil or
Neutral Evil.
I don't really trust anyone or anything at all because they all tend to oppress my freedom to do whatever i want to do which is what i long for and really only care about despite seeming like i don't. I also can be really lazy when it comes to everything and anything. I believe that good and bad are subjective as what one person views as good another will view as bad etc. For example: I slept with my good friend who is dating someone at the moment
some will consider me evil because of this or Neutral, however he offered to do it with me when i brought it up in a conversation one night and then he changed his mind while doing it with me so i stopped due to him changing his mind. I was so enjoying it until he stopped and since then i've been upset with him. So
because i sensed that he was gonna kill the enjoyment for me somehow, afterwards and still am irritated that he backed out. I also have gone and sold a christmas present after being told not to for money, because i was craving Popcorn at the time. I also for the longest time made it out to look like i forgave my mom but really i went over to her place with her current lover to eat and so she can't say that i don't see her at all.
I will always respect her for bringing me into this world but don't trust her.
I also believe that people should be free to do whatever they want, however whatever they end up doing with that freedom is on them to deal with not me.
I don't use violence but don't consider myself a pacifist because if i could find a way to use it with my lack of upper body strength i would.
I also don't like being told no but tend to swallow my feelings about the issue and pretend like i don't.
Edit:Which alignment or alignments do you think you are? and which of them is this OP?
Will be interesting to see the responses.
"I meant to say I really went over to her and her current lover's place to eat instead of " but really i went over to her place with her current lover to eat".
Okay, well the alignment system makes alot more sense then the Bible and anything similar to it.
Even as an atheist, I have a strong problem with that statement. It implies that you have a very narrow reductionist, superficial view of the world and the people around you. And if you've actually READ a Bible, you don't seem to have bothered to understand it much, or the contexts in which various parts of it were written over the centuries.
What you fail to understand is that alignment was built as a wargaming mechanic to determine what kind of units you could put together for a wargaming board army. It's roleplaying features are of secondary function and not really meant to be looked over with an electron microscope. Take any popular character of any real depth and you'll get equally convincing arguments for multiple alignments which may be more than one step from each other... because people ARE that complex.
Alignment is a crappy way of describing any character that's got more depth than an Ayn Rand cipher.
Alright. Well i tried reading the bible once and i just couldn't bring myself to read anymore and as far as my views go. Um i do not have to conform and become a copycat if i do not want too. Just because you decide to not believe in a god and read through the bible does not mean i have to conform and copy everything you do sir. And i know this alignment system was designed for something originally but i decided to believe in it, so you are allowed to believe we evolved from an ape? or that an explosion happened and we just came to be but how dare i choose to not conform and believe in something else? uh whats with the double standards? why am i denied my right to choose Lazar?
If you prefer to make your judgements from ignorance that is your right and no one will prevent you from doing so. Your arguments and pronouncements however will be weighed on the foundation (or lack of) you support them with. If you think that people can be judged on the methodology of a paper and dice gaming system, I can only hope that you're not in a position to make important decisions that impact real lives.
Seeing your response on the atheist who defends the sensibility of the Bible (at last as a moral treatise), I'd have to say this exercise has brought you more than enough attention. When the post was about a blank slate with a few character flaws, it was a potentially interesting discussion about alignment mechanics vs real world ethics and how we all might see them. Your response about the Bible clearly indicates you want to pick a fight. First you bring the Bible into a conversation for the purpose of comparing it to a roleplaying mechanic, then you type a long response declaring that you don't have to read it if you don't want to. We know that already. That doesn't change its merits, whether historical, ethical or theological (I am fully bought into all three). What's your real purpose? To have strangers further define you, or to tempt comments from well-meaning respondents and then argue with their posts?
I hope you've learned something about yourself and I hope you gain greater depth of character and are pleased with the result.
I started this thread as a source of amusement and self gratification but you probably figured as much huh? or did i?
Okay, well the alignment system makes alot more sense then the Bible and anything similar to it.
Even as an atheist, I have a strong problem with that statement. It implies that you have a very narrow reductionist, superficial view of the world and the people around you. And if you've actually READ a Bible, you don't seem to have bothered to understand it much, or the contexts in which various parts of it were written over the centuries.
What you fail to understand is that alignment was built as a wargaming mechanic to determine what kind of units you could put together for a wargaming board army. It's roleplaying features are of secondary function and not really meant to be looked over with an electron microscope. Take any popular character of any real depth and you'll get equally convincing arguments for multiple alignments which may be more than one step from each other... because people ARE that complex.
Alignment is a crappy way of describing any character that's got more depth than an Ayn Rand cipher.
Alright. Well i tried reading the bible once and i just couldn't bring myself to read anymore and as far as my views go. Um i do not have to conform and become a copycat if i do not want too. Just because you decide to not believe in a god and read through the bible does not mean i have to conform and copy everything you do sir. And i know this alignment system was designed for something originally but i decided to believe in it, so you are allowed to believe we evolved from an ape? or that an explosion happened and we just came to be but how dare i choose to not conform and believe in something else? uh whats with the double standards? why am i denied my right to choose Lazar?
If you prefer to make your judgements from ignorance that is your right and no one will prevent you from doing so. Your arguments and pronouncements however will be weighed on the foundation (or lack of) you support...
I will use my freedom to do what i want, for the record i do think these alignments exist in real life meaning there are people out there with certain traits that line up with the alignments i believe anyways. But yes people are very complex, hence why i put out the possibility of people being more then one alignment. However there are people out there that are so complex that no alignment works for them at all perhaps there are more of these people then i realize who knows really.
Also I'm confused: Why are you defending the bible if you do not believe in it? unless there are parts that you do believe in? i don't know really, what i do know is that I'm really nerdy about this specific aspect, much like those that are about different things but meh!
The OP is clearly Chaotic. He behaves in a way that rejects and mistrusts any authority in his life. He openly violates social rules.
G/N/E... Not sure. BUT you do seem to cling to a sort of apathy and that is most often a neutral trait. In the tiny tiny bit you posted about yourself you haven't directly hurt anyone or done anything to help anyone either. So you are probably CN.
I myself volunteer my time to help others.
I believe strongly in the rule of law and it depresses me to see so much evil in the world... It frightens me that such evil can and has so easily targeted me. I also take great care to do things the right way. Because how you do something sometimes speaks more about you than what you are doing.
I'm going to let others respond before I answer your question. But given your responses, I rather doubt that you're worth my effort to continue this. And I see no reason to needlessly add to this thread count.
You may see this as a way to get some attention, or your jollies. You might imagine that we are in some sort of contest. But we're not. I have no interest, nor desire to convert you, to convince you, or even to prove to you my worth, or the worth of my opinions as you don't show any sign that you have any concept of social decorum or respect.
If you wish to take this as some form of victory, feel welcome to do so. But I won't claim to lead you or anyone to any form of enlightenment. That is a path each of us has to discover for oneself and has to choose to make that effort.
I'm going to let others respond before I answer your question. But given your responses, I rather doubt that you're worth my effort to continue this. And I see no reason to needlessly add to this thread count.
I was trying to be as civil as i possibly thought i could be , but i didn't do it right huh? oh well like i always say you can never please anyone no matter what, so why bother.
You may see this as a way to get some attention, or your jollies. You might imagine that we are in some sort of contest. But we're not. I have no interest, nor desire to convert you, to convince you, or even to prove to you my worth, or the worth of my opinions as you don't show any sign that you have any concept of social decorum or respect.
Why should i show any concept of social decorum or respect if you are just gonna be unhappy with me no matter what i do?
If you wish to take this as some form of victory, feel welcome to do so. But I won't claim to lead you or anyone to any form of enlightenment. That is a path each of us has to discover for oneself and has to choose to make that effort.
Alright.
I'd be chaotic neutral leaning at times to neutral and a curious dab of lawful neutral (if you give your word that should be your bond, if you claim to stand for something then actually stand for it coward).
I believe strongly in the rule of law and it depresses me to see so much evil in the world... It frightens me that such evil can and has so easily targeted me. I also take great care to do things the right way. Because how you do something sometimes speaks more about you than what you are doing.
So nice! Awww, if only I could be so trusting of authority and the "good" powers that claim to be good.
I'd be chaotic neutral leaning at times to neutral and a curious dab of lawful neutral (if you give your word that should be your bond, if you claim to stand for something then actually stand for it coward).
The first poster is chaotic all over the place.
Huh.
Alright with that said, if you were to try and pinpoint out of CN or CE or even CN leaning G or E which would you go with?
Chaotic good. I'm really subject to my whims and fancies, but I do like helping people and am generally a nice guy. I don't really care much for law, either.
And i know this alignment system was designed for something originally but i decided to believe in it, so you are allowed to believe we evolved from an ape? or that an explosion happened and we just came to be but how dare i choose to not conform and believe in something else? uh whats with the double standards? why am i denied my right to choose Lazar?
Bolded sections indicate lack of comprehension of the concept of objective reality.
I'd be chaotic neutral leaning at times to neutral and a curious dab of lawful neutral (if you give your word that should be your bond, if you claim to stand for something then actually stand for it coward).
The first poster is chaotic all over the place.
Huh.
Alright with that said, if you were to try and pinpoint out of CN or CE or even CN leaning G or E which would you go with?
CN, but not my CN, no you are not cool enough for that.
; )
Perhaps you move as you feel you need to, or do as you wish, fickle all over the place, betraying trust and friends in search of a quick bang, profit or what is easy.
Now you might get some sort of code or adhere to certain laws, you are still young yeah? You might even out, find something to believe in, something that makes it all make sense, we shall see. Watch out for clerics!
Chaotic good. I'm really subject to my whims and fancies, but I do like helping people and am generally a nice guy. I don't really care much for law, either.
And i know this alignment system was designed for something originally but i decided to believe in it, so you are allowed to believe we evolved from an ape? or that an explosion happened and we just came to be but how dare i choose to not conform and believe in something else? uh whats with the double standards? why am i denied my right to choose Lazar?
Bolded sections indicate lack of comprehension of the concept of objective reality.
I'd be chaotic neutral leaning at times to neutral and a curious dab of lawful neutral (if you give your word that should be your bond, if you claim to stand for something then actually stand for it coward).
The first poster is chaotic all over the place.
Huh.
Alright with that said, if you were to try and pinpoint out of CN or CE or even CN leaning G or E which would you go with?
CN, but not my CN, no you are not cool enough for that.
; )
Perhaps you move as you feel you need to, or do as you wish, fickle all over the place, betraying trust and friends in search of a quick bang, profit or what is easy.
Now you might get some sort of code or adhere to certain laws, you are still young yeah? You might even out, find something to believe in, something that makes it all make sense, we shall see. Watch out for clerics!
RPG Superstar 2013 Top 8
