| FiddlersGreen |
| 21 people marked this as FAQ candidate. Answered in the errata. 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
The Ring of Revelation specifically states that it only works for characters with the relevant mystery, and that it only works on oracles.
UMD allows you to emulate a class FEATURE rather than a class per se.
So the question is, would a non-oracle be able to use UMD to get the benefit of a ring of revelation?
| wraithstrike |
The Ring of Revelation specifically states that it only works for characters with the relevant mystery, and that it only works on oracles.
UMD allows you to emulate a class FEATURE rather than a class per se.
So the question is, would a non-oracle be able to use UMD to get the benefit of a ring of revelation?
UMD trumps the "only class X" rule unless there is specific rule stating that not even UMD can bypass it.
| FiddlersGreen |
FiddlersGreen wrote:UMD trumps the "only class X" rule unless there is specific rule stating that not even UMD can bypass it.The Ring of Revelation specifically states that it only works for characters with the relevant mystery, and that it only works on oracles.
UMD allows you to emulate a class FEATURE rather than a class per se.
So the question is, would a non-oracle be able to use UMD to get the benefit of a ring of revelation?
I would think that this ruling makes more sense, but RAW, it seems to not work this way?
| wraithstrike |
wraithstrike wrote:I would think that this ruling makes more sense, but RAW, it seems to not work this way?FiddlersGreen wrote:UMD trumps the "only class X" rule unless there is specific rule stating that not even UMD can bypass it.The Ring of Revelation specifically states that it only works for characters with the relevant mystery, and that it only works on oracles.
UMD allows you to emulate a class FEATURE rather than a class per se.
So the question is, would a non-oracle be able to use UMD to get the benefit of a ring of revelation?
Actually I was going by RAW. Even the UMD example uses a similar wording.
Emulate a Class Feature: Sometimes you need to use a class feature to activate a magic item. In this case, your effective level in the emulated class equals your Use Magic Device check result minus 20.
The point of the UMD for this case is specifically for items that require you to have the class feature. If the item did not require class feature X then this use of UMD would not be needed.
| FiddlersGreen |
FiddlersGreen wrote:wraithstrike wrote:I would think that this ruling makes more sense, but RAW, it seems to not work this way?FiddlersGreen wrote:UMD trumps the "only class X" rule unless there is specific rule stating that not even UMD can bypass it.The Ring of Revelation specifically states that it only works for characters with the relevant mystery, and that it only works on oracles.
UMD allows you to emulate a class FEATURE rather than a class per se.
So the question is, would a non-oracle be able to use UMD to get the benefit of a ring of revelation?
Actually I was going by RAW. Even the UMD example uses a similar wording.
Emulate a Class Feature: Sometimes you need to use a class feature to activate a magic item. In this case, your effective level in the emulated class equals your Use Magic Device check result minus 20.
The point of the UMD for this case is specifically for items that require you to have the class feature. If the item did not require class feature X then this use of UMD would not be needed.
No, my point was that you could emulate the *class feature* with UMD, but not emulate having the *class itself*. So, the way I'm reading it, it seems that an oracle could get a ring to work by emulating a mystery that he or she does not have. A non-oracle emulating the same mystery via UMD however would not be able to use the ring because he can't emulate the class itself using UMD.
It's entirely possible that I'm being overly pedantic in my reading of the rules though.
| Rubia |
| 2 people marked this as FAQ candidate. |
wraithstrike wrote:wraithstrike wrote:
UMD trumps the "only class X" rule unless there is specific rule stating that not even UMD can bypass it.Actually I was going by RAW. Even the UMD example uses a similar wording.
Emulate a Class Feature: Sometimes you need to use a class feature to activate a magic item. In this case, your effective level in the emulated class equals your Use Magic Device check result minus 20.
The point of the UMD for this case is specifically for items that require you to have the class feature. If the item did not require class feature X then this use of UMD would not be needed.
No, my point was that you could emulate the *class feature* with UMD, but not emulate having the *class itself*. So, the way I'm reading it, it seems that an oracle could get a ring to work by emulating a mystery that he or she does not have. A non-oracle emulating the same mystery via UMD however would not be able to use the ring because he can't emulate the class itself using UMD.
It's entirely possible that I'm being overly pedantic in my reading of the rules though.
I must admit I'm a bit confused by this whole UMD/Ring of Revelation argument. It seems like a textbook application of UMD by RAW:
1) Wear ring of revelation.
2) Emulate the mystery associated with the ring.
3) Once I have emulated the class feature (mystery), UMD specifically states that I gain an effective level (of oracle) equal to UMD - 20.
4) Confirm that the effective level is greater than the minimum required for the revelation. If not, stop here.
5) Since I now have tricked the ring into having a feature and a class (which I didn't emulate specifically, but is a consequence of emulating a feature), I can now use the ring.
For the sake of simplicity, let's assume the revelation to be used is simple, and doesn't refer to any other class features of the oracle (and can therefore be used without further issue).
I'm willing to accept that I'm wrong on this sequence of steps, but where is the error in logic?
| Serisan |
Aura faint or moderate varied; CL 5th (lesser), 7th (greater), or
11th (superior)
Slot ring; Price 10,000 gp (lesser), 16,000 gp (greater), 24,000
gp (superior); Weight —
DESCRIPTION
A ring of revelation is a divine item attuned to a particular
oracular mystery and containing a revelation associated with
that mystery (see the oracle class description). While wearing
the ring, an oracle has access to that revelation and may
use it as if she had it as a normal class feature. The oracle
must have the appropriate mystery to use the ring, and must
meet the level requirements (if any) of the revelation itself;
for example, a ring of revelation (combat healer) is only usable
by an oracle of at least 7th level with the battle mystery. If
the oracle already has that revelation and the revelation
gives an ability with a limited number of uses per day, the
oracle can use that ability one additional time per day.
The ring has no effect if worn by a non-oracle.[
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
| KrispyXIV |
** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
However, at the same time, UMD says the following:
"Emulate a Class Feature: Sometimes you need to use a class feature to activate a magic item. In this case, your effective level in the emulated class equals your Use Magic Device check result minus 20. "
You are emulating the mystery class feature, and your effective oracle level is check-20. So UMD would certainly imply that the for purposes of wearing and using the ring, you are an Oracle.
| Serisan |
Serisan wrote:Yup, I had read it. But the sequence of steps above tricks the ring into thinking I'm an oracle. It seems that the purpose of UMD is to bypass such restrictions.** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
Alternatively, that specific line would indicate an exception to the UMD rule. That's certainly how it would appear to me.
| KrispyXIV |
Rubia wrote:Alternatively, that specific line would indicate an exception to the UMD rule. That's certainly how it would appear to me.Serisan wrote:Yup, I had read it. But the sequence of steps above tricks the ring into thinking I'm an oracle. It seems that the purpose of UMD is to bypass such restrictions.** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
If it were a specific exeception to UMD, wouldn't it be a lot easier to call out that you cannot UMD the requirements?
| Serisan |
Serisan wrote:If it were a specific exeception to UMD, wouldn't it be a lot easier to call out that you cannot UMD the requirements?Rubia wrote:Alternatively, that specific line would indicate an exception to the UMD rule. That's certainly how it would appear to me.Serisan wrote:Yup, I had read it. But the sequence of steps above tricks the ring into thinking I'm an oracle. It seems that the purpose of UMD is to bypass such restrictions.** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
It's only 1 requirement that you can't UMD. You can certainly UMD the Mystery portion. It's just the class portion that appears to be disallowed.
| Rubia |
KrispyXIV wrote:It's only 1 requirement that you can't UMD. You can certainly UMD the Mystery portion. It's just the class portion that appears to be disallowed.Serisan wrote:If it were a specific exeception to UMD, wouldn't it be a lot easier to call out that you cannot UMD the requirements?Rubia wrote:Alternatively, that specific line would indicate an exception to the UMD rule. That's certainly how it would appear to me.Serisan wrote:Yup, I had read it. But the sequence of steps above tricks the ring into thinking I'm an oracle. It seems that the purpose of UMD is to bypass such restrictions.** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
It has no effect for a non-oracle, but the use of UMD makes me an oracle for the purposes of using the ring. The ring now thinks I'm an oracle. How is this sentence stopping the use of UMD for this case?
I don't see how that last sentence implies, suggests, or states that UMD cannot be used.
| KrispyXIV |
Serisan wrote:KrispyXIV wrote:It's only 1 requirement that you can't UMD. You can certainly UMD the Mystery portion. It's just the class portion that appears to be disallowed.Serisan wrote:If it were a specific exeception to UMD, wouldn't it be a lot easier to call out that you cannot UMD the requirements?Rubia wrote:Alternatively, that specific line would indicate an exception to the UMD rule. That's certainly how it would appear to me.Serisan wrote:Yup, I had read it. But the sequence of steps above tricks the ring into thinking I'm an oracle. It seems that the purpose of UMD is to bypass such restrictions.** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
It has no effect for a non-oracle, but the use of UMD makes me an oracle for the purposes of using the ring. The ring now thinks I'm an oracle. How is this sentence stopping the use of UMD for this case?
I don't see how that last sentence implies, suggests, or states that UMD cannot be used.
Exactly. Per UMD, the act of emulating a class feature gives you an effective level in the class itself.
| Dire Mongoose |
In the context of core and therefore just the core items, if the class bit of UMD isn't for things like "I can use a Holy Avenger, even though I'm not actually a paladin", I don't know what use it would even have.
Therefore, logically, I would think UMD is meant to let you use items that normally only a member of another class could use.
| Rubia |
In the context of core and therefore just the core items, if the class bit of UMD isn't for things like "I can use a Holy Avenger, even though I'm not actually a paladin", I don't know what use it would even have.
Therefore, logically, I would think UMD is meant to let you use items that normally only a member of another class could use.
Well, for the holy avenger specifically, you are not emulating a class feature (which seems like the only way to gain effective levels in paladin). That gets into the philosophical question of "Is being a paladin a class feature of the paladin class?" That's one of those weird meta-questions that we could argue about for a loooong time without any resolution.
| Serisan |
| 1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
In the context of core and therefore just the core items, if the class bit of UMD isn't for things like "I can use a Holy Avenger, even though I'm not actually a paladin", I don't know what use it would even have.
Therefore, logically, I would think UMD is meant to let you use items that normally only a member of another class could use.
You can always use a Holy Avenger. It's just not as great on a non-Paladin. Also, there's no specific text exempting the use of UMD for the specific purpose of pretending to be a Paladin.
My point about the Ring of Revelation is that the text specifically disallows use by non-Oracles.
LazarX
|
Serisan wrote:** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
However, at the same time, UMD says the following:
"Emulate a Class Feature: Sometimes you need to use a class feature to activate a magic item. In this case, your effective level in the emulated class equals your Use Magic Device check result minus 20. "
You are emulating the mystery class feature, and your effective oracle level is check-20. So UMD would certainly imply that the for purposes of wearing and using the ring, you are an Oracle.
Specific trumps general. Not that it makes any difference. you can't use a revelation if you're not an oracle, so even in success, the result gives you nothing. The last line of the ring's description seems particurlarly aimed at you UMD lot.
| Rubia |
Dire Mongoose wrote:In the context of core and therefore just the core items, if the class bit of UMD isn't for things like "I can use a Holy Avenger, even though I'm not actually a paladin", I don't know what use it would even have.
Therefore, logically, I would think UMD is meant to let you use items that normally only a member of another class could use.
You can always use a Holy Avenger. It's just not as great on a non-Paladin. Also, there's no specific text exempting the use of UMD for the specific purpose of pretending to be a Paladin.
My point about the Ring of Revelation is that the text specifically disallows use by non-Oracles.
There is also no way to UMD to become a paladin without emulating a class feature, per RAW.
Regarding the ring, once I've tricked the ring into thinking it's an oracle, I can use it. There is no specific restriction against UMD usage.
| Rubia |
| 2 people marked this as FAQ candidate. |
KrispyXIV wrote:Specific trumps general. Not that it makes any difference. you can't use a revelation if you're not an oracle, so even in success, the result gives you nothing. The last line of the ring's description seems particurlarly aimed at you UMD lot.Serisan wrote:** spoiler omitted **
Read the last line. That's why UMD does not work with Ring of Revelation.
However, at the same time, UMD says the following:
"Emulate a Class Feature: Sometimes you need to use a class feature to activate a magic item. In this case, your effective level in the emulated class equals your Use Magic Device check result minus 20. "
You are emulating the mystery class feature, and your effective oracle level is check-20. So UMD would certainly imply that the for purposes of wearing and using the ring, you are an Oracle.
This is not a question of specific trumping general. This is a situation where the last line of the ring's description does NOT restrict the use of UMD. It only provides an additional hoop to jump through, that incidentally, is easily overcome through the use of UMD. In other words, it may have been aimed at the "UMD lot", but per RAW, it missed by a wide margin. A textbook use of UMD bypasses the restriction.
Please read my earlier post (located here) about the steps taken to activate the ring. In those steps, you will clearly see (among other things) that you are in fact an oracle when you activate the item: thus, the last line is satisfied.
| Rubia |
Serisan wrote:I don't personally see the two as different.Also, there's no specific text exempting the use of UMD for the specific purpose of pretending to be a Paladin.
My point about the Ring of Revelation is that the text specifically disallows use by non-Oracles.
These issues are different, since UMD lets you emulate a class feature, but not a class directly. In the ring case, you can emulate a feature and get the class for free. In the sword case, there is no required feature available to emulate, so you cannot use UMD.
| Serisan |
Dire Mongoose wrote:These issues are different, since UMD lets you emulate a class feature, but not a class directly. In the ring case, you can emulate a feature and get the class for free. In the sword case, there is no required feature available to emulate, so you cannot use UMD.Serisan wrote:I don't personally see the two as different.Also, there's no specific text exempting the use of UMD for the specific purpose of pretending to be a Paladin.
My point about the Ring of Revelation is that the text specifically disallows use by non-Oracles.
Why would the text be there if it weren't there to serve a specific purpose? Of course you can emulate the Mystery class feature. That's no problem. That last line practically reads that you can't emulate being an Oracle for the purpose of the ring.
Chris Mortika
RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16
|
We have here two lines of the rules which absolutely contradict one another. The rules for Use Magic Device allow the skill to bypass the restrictions without exception. The rules for the magic ring prevent non-oracles from using it, without exception. I don't see either side offering convincing proof that the rules aren't ambiguous.
Short of a developer coming on and issuing a Word of God clarification, the conflict is left to the GM at the table to adjudicate.
| voska66 |
"The ring has no effect if worn by a non-oracle."
This sentence to me means that if you gain a Mystery and a revelation but aren't an Oracle you can't use this ring. Now I'm not sure if there is even a way to gain Mystery and revelation with out being an Oracle today. Maybe there is already and I just don't know about it, like via Magic Item. In the future maybe a feat like the Eldrich Heritage chain but for Oracle Mysteries. It's possible a Prestige Class could as well. There are other prestige class that give you class abilities of another class where you don't have to be that class. Like the Horizon Walker with Ranger Favored Terrains.
So I don't think this has anything to do with UMD.
LazarX
|
We have here two lines of the rules which absolutely contradict one another. The rules for Use Magic Device allow the skill to bypass the restrictions without exception.
Incorrect. No rule is immune from exceptions. Any general rule can be pre-empted by a specific exemption. In fact, that is the basic structure of this game, Rules and Exceptions. Pathfinder can be said to be considerably more exception driven than the game it evolved from.
| Rubia |
Rubia wrote:Why would the text be there if it weren't there to serve a specific purpose? Of course you can emulate the Mystery class feature. That's no problem. That last line practically reads that you can't emulate being an Oracle for the purpose of the ring.Dire Mongoose wrote:These issues are different, since UMD lets you emulate a class feature, but not a class directly. In the ring case, you can emulate a feature and get the class for free. In the sword case, there is no required feature available to emulate, so you cannot use UMD.Serisan wrote:I don't personally see the two as different.Also, there's no specific text exempting the use of UMD for the specific purpose of pretending to be a Paladin.
My point about the Ring of Revelation is that the text specifically disallows use by non-Oracles.
I am willing to admit that the last line was probably intended to have a purpose. My point is that the written rules do not support that interpretation, and according to written rules, it clearly works. It probably shouldn't. But that point needs to be errata'd, not just ruled randomly.
| Rubia |
We have here two lines of the rules which absolutely contradict one another. The rules for Use Magic Device allow the skill to bypass the restrictions without exception. The rules for the magic ring prevent non-oracles from using it, without exception. I don't see either side offering convincing proof that the rules aren't ambiguous.
Short of a developer coming on and issuing a Word of God clarification, the conflict is left to the GM at the table to adjudicate.
I don't read the last line as anything other than what it specifically says, namely that it prevents non-oracles from using it. This is an additional restriction (along with the mystery requirement).
Unfortunately, this restriction (though it may be intended to limit the use of UMD) was written in a way that it does not prevent UMD's use.
A) The ring says it prevents non-oracles from using it.
B) UMD provides a way to satisfy requirements (such as being an oracle) that one doesn't have.
If a person says that A prevents B from working, then UMD can never be used to satisfy any requirements ever. The reason for this is that explicitly written requirements are logically identical to implicit requirements: they are still requirements. This argument prevents UMD from ever working.
If, on the other hand, a person says that B allows one to bypass A. This is the specific function of UMD. It's clean. It's within the mechanical "back and forth" based on the rule, exception, bypass system that lies under Pathfinder.
The conflict with current wording is clear. . . . Errata is required to prevent UMD's use with the ring. (At least until I hear a better argument.)
| Dire Mongoose |
Specific trumps general.
Except the entire point of the UMD skill is to use magic items you otherwise couldn't because of what class/alignment/etc. you aren't.
In a very real sense. UMD is the specific, not the general. In general, a random non-druid gomer can't use a druid scroll, but UMD provides for an exception to that general rule.
Matthew Morris
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
My Two C-bills.
The ring specifically calls out: "The ring has no effect if worn by a non-oracle." as a specific feature. The Holy Avenger doesn't say this. It simply lists that it does X in the hands of a paladin. A spell completion item doesn't say "This won't function in the hands of someone w/o the spell." Only the ring calls this out in its description, after listing the requirements for an oracle to use it.
Here's my logic.
Holy Avenger
1) Pick up sword
2) Use UMD to emulate Paladin class ability, rolling high enough to get effective character level.
3) Congratulations, you can use the holy sword as paladin of X effective character level
Ring of Revelation
1) Put ring on.
2) Use UMD to emulate class ability (mystery) and roll high enough to emulate level.
3) You're still a non-oracle.
4) Ring fails to work, due to specific exception in description of ring.
| Rubia |
My Two C-bills.
The ring specifically calls out: "The ring has no effect if worn by a non-oracle." as a specific feature. The Holy Avenger doesn't say this. It simply lists that it does X in the hands of a paladin. A spell completion item doesn't say "This won't function in the hands of someone w/o the spell." Only the ring calls this out in its description, after listing the requirements for an oracle to use it.
Here's my logic.
Holy Avenger
1) Pick up sword
2) Use UMD to emulate Paladin class ability, rolling high enough to get effective character level.
3) Congratulations, you can use the holy sword as paladin of X effective character levelRing of Revelation
1) Put ring on.
2) Use UMD to emulate class ability (mystery) and roll high enough to emulate level.
3) You're still a non-oracle.
4) Ring fails to work, due to specific exception in description of ring.
Sigh. You're completely wrong. In fact, you've mixed them up too!
Please read the UMD skill description while you read what I'm explaining. Alternatively, you can read this post here for details.
Holy Avenger: You cannot emulate a class directly, per UMD. There is no feature (well, probably) to emulate. You cannot use the sword as a paladin if you aren't one already.
Ring: After your step 2, you're also an oracle with a level of (UMD-20). Congrats! You can use the ring!!!
Also, implicit and explicit restrictions are logically the same. The holy avenger has implicit in its description the sentence "if you're not a paladin, you can't kick butt with this sword". The logical consequence is identical, whether it's listed or not.
The ring lists its oracle restriction separately because technically, "being an oracle" is different from "having a mystery". This would come into play if someone found a way to get a mystery without being an oracle (say through some feat similar to Eldritch Heritage or something). As written, it does not invalidate the use of UMD, which simultaneously handles both restrictions.
LazarX
|
LazarX wrote:Specific trumps general.Except the entire point of the UMD skill is to use magic items you otherwise couldn't because of what class/alignment/etc. you aren't.
In a very real sense. UMD is the specific, not the general. In general, a random non-druid gomer can't use a druid scroll, but UMD provides for an exception to that general rule.
We could argue about whether UMD was intended to open up every single item in the verse to use or whether it was merely intended to simply broaden magic item use until we're blue in the face. The answer to that I think is one of those things deliberately left to GM adjudication.
Matthew Morris
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
You cannot emulate a class directly, per UMD.
The ring lists its oracle restriction separately because technically, "being an oracle" is different from "having a mystery". This would come into play if someone found a way to get a mystery without being an oracle (say through some feat similar to Eldritch Heritage or something). As written, it does not invalidate the use of UMD, which simultaneously handles both restrictions.
Try reading what you wrote. Slowly, I'll wait.
You say you cannot emulate a class directly.
The ring states it doesn't work for a non-oracle. Which you've conceeded you cannot use UMD to tell the ring 'trust me, I'm an Oracle'
Therefore you're just proved you can't UMD to use the ring. Congratulations!
Or, you're saying that you can't emulate a class feature to gain a virtual class level to use the holy avenger, but you can emulate a class feature to count as an oracle.
FYI, I was reading from my PDF. I know I know, you used your mystic powers to assume I wasn't reading what I was talking about. Next time try less assuming and more reasoning.
Belafon
|
Here's a very important part of the UMD description
This skill does not let you actually use the class feature of another class. It just lets you activate items as if you had that class feature.
I would interpret this to allow UMD for rings of revelation that have ONLY an "on use" component. (Revelations such as Surprising Charge would be allowed, but Skill at Arms would not.) How to implement revelations that gain uses per day with level - like surprising charge - is less clear. I personally would have the wearer make one roll the first time they tried to use the device in a given day and have that determine the total number of uses.
| Rubia |
Rubia wrote:You cannot emulate a class directly, per UMD.
The ring lists its oracle restriction separately because technically, "being an oracle" is different from "having a mystery". This would come into play if someone found a way to get a mystery without being an oracle (say through some feat similar to Eldritch Heritage or something). As written, it does not invalidate the use of UMD, which simultaneously handles both restrictions.
Try reading what you wrote. Slowly, I'll wait.
You say you cannot emulate a class directly.
The ring states it doesn't work for a non-oracle. Which you've conceeded you cannot use UMD to tell the ring 'trust me, I'm an Oracle'
Therefore you're just proved you can't UMD to use the ring. Congratulations!
Or, you're saying that you can't emulate a class feature to gain a virtual class level to use the holy avenger, but you can emulate a class feature to count as an oracle.
FYI, I was reading from my PDF. I know I know, you used your mystic powers to assume I wasn't reading what I was talking about. Next time try less assuming and more reasoning.
All things I've written follow logically. I said that one cannot use UMD to emulate a class directly. That word is key.
Two ways to go on holy avenger sword:
1) There is no required class feature to use the sword (at the awesome level). UMD only kicks in when you need to use a class feature. (Otherwise, I suppose you could go around emulating class features constantly for the heck of it.) Therefore, you cannot emulate anything to use a holy avenger sword, because there is no feature that UMD allows you to emulate. I know of no other way to gain class levels for item activation.
2) "Being a paladin" is a class feature of the paladin class. Then I can equally as well emulate the "being an oracle" feature for the oracle class.
In case 1, you can still, however, emulate a mystery (a class feature!) with the ring. Doing so gives you levels in Oracle for purposes of using the ring. Did I emulate a class which is not an ability of UMD? No. Did I emulate a feature and get a satisfying class as a consequence? Yes.
Sorry I was being snarky about the reading thing. I wasn't implying that you were obtuse. I was trying to help, since even I didn't realize that "emulate a class" isn't a valid option for how to use UMD until recently. I also didn't realize that "emulate a class feature" gave you levels in the class for the purposes of using the ring. I thought you were suffering from a similar issue.
Still, I didn't accuse you of not reading. . . I simply asked you to read. :)
| Rubia |
Here's a very important part of the UMD description
PRD wrote:This skill does not let you actually use the class feature of another class. It just lets you activate items as if you had that class feature.I would interpret this to allow UMD for rings of revelation that have ONLY an "on use" component. (Revelations such as Surprising Charge would be allowed, but Skill at Arms would not.) How to implement revelations that gain uses per day with level - like surprising charge - is less clear. I personally would have the wearer make one roll the first time they tried to use the device in a given day and have that determine the total number of uses.
I'm not sure that's right. Activation is "starting", but UMD has a provision for maintaining items that have continuous effects---make a check once per hour.
I do agree that uses/day is complicated. Is it a continuing effect (for the day) where you check once per hour to make sure you can still do it? What happens if your uses/day is tied to what you're emulating? Does your ability get stronger or weaker as the day goes on? Still, I think this is better than the alternative, where they are considered separate uses.
If it is treated as separate uses, then that's probably broken, since that would mean the uses/day resets each time you make the check. . . .
. . . and that would mean you would have a very cheap unlimited use item.
Rubia
| Ravingdork |
Ravingdork wrote:I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this thread.How's that, blindfolded man?
*Reaches into pocket, pulls out rotted eyeball, places it onto thread*
Like that. Maybe you shouldn't have asked. ;P
Matthew Morris
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
No problems, I'm likely a little testy today, so I may have over reacted.
For the holy Avenger, the abilities work off of the class level. So if you emulate a class ability (say, channel energy) you generate a class level, which can then (in theory) let the Holy Sword 'work off' of those. Basically you're going, "Look, I'm really a Paladin, watch me channel energy!" the sword goes "Detecting Paladin level X, engaging Y abilities at X power level."
(With the holy sword, the question might be 'is the paladin enhancement part of the sword, or a class feature?' but I'm meandering, call it lack of sleep)
In either case, what strikes me with the ring is that it calls out specifically that it doesn't work for non-oracles. If you can't emulate a class, then you can't use the ring.
In my world OT:
| Gignere |
No problems, I'm likely a little testy today, so I may have over reacted.
For the holy Avenger, the abilities work off of the class level. So if you emulate a class ability (say, channel energy) you generate a class level, which can then (in theory) let the Holy Sword 'work off' of those. Basically you're going, "Look, I'm really a Paladin, watch me channel energy!" the sword goes "Detecting Paladin level X, engaging Y abilities at X power level."
(With the holy sword, the question might be 'is the paladin enhancement part of the sword, or a class feature?' but I'm meandering, call it lack of sleep)
In either case, what strikes me with the ring is that it calls out specifically that it doesn't work for non-oracles. If you can't emulate a class, then you can't use the ring.
In my world OT:
** spoiler omitted **
If you can emulate a paladin feature to get paladin levels, why wouldn't emulating a mystery provide you with oracle levels?
So wouldn't UMD work for ring of revelations as it would for the holy avenger?
| Mattastrophic |
Hmm...
Let's consider Oracles with UMD and this item...
Let's say I have a PC with at least one level of Oracle and a huge UMD modifier. My PC puts on a Ring of Revelation, containing a revelation which is outside his mystery; let's use Channel from Oracle of Life as an example. He then makes a UMD check and gets, say, a 35.
Am I correct in saying that he counts as a 15th-level Oracle when determining how large his Channels are?
-Matt
| Rubia |
No problems, I'm likely a little testy today, so I may have over reacted.
For the holy Avenger, the abilities work off of the class level. So if you emulate a class ability (say, channel energy) you generate a class level, which can then (in theory) let the Holy Sword 'work off' of those. Basically you're going, "Look, I'm really a Paladin, watch me channel energy!" the sword goes "Detecting Paladin level X, engaging Y abilities at X power level."
(With the holy sword, the question might be 'is the paladin enhancement part of the sword, or a class feature?' but I'm meandering, call it lack of sleep)
In either case, what strikes me with the ring is that it calls out specifically that it doesn't work for non-oracles. If you can't emulate a class, then you can't use the ring.
I'm not sure you can emulate "channel energy" to trick the sword, because the emulate class feature ability of UMD requires that the feature being emulated is needed to activate the item. I'm not sure if "needed" implies that you can then do it even if you only "need" the levels, but I'd assume not. I think of the levels granted as "collateral effects" of the primary triggered ability.
The disagreement we seem to have on ring vs. sword, then, is that you're making a distinction between implicit and explicit restrictions. That distinction isn't there at a logical level. And anyways, the reason the "non-oracle" restriction is called out is because it's different from "having a mystery". If there were a way to satisfy one without the other then you would clearly see that there is a purpose to the sentence.
Right now, since the only way we know to satisfy one (mystery) also satisfies the other (oracle), it seems jarring. But that's only because it's not easy to see a situation where you can satisfy one or not the other.
Here are two examples of feats to help clarify the issue:
Mysterious
Benefit: Gain a mystery but no revelations. And by the way, you still don't get to be a dirty sneaky oracle, you evil cheating min-maxer.
Hot Hot Oracle Goodness
Benefit: You may activate items and satisfy requirements as an oracle at your current character level, though you have no actual levels in that class.
If you took either feat, you couldn't activate the ring. This argument illustrates that the last sentence is not superfluous, only that it doesn't limit UMD's usage, since that gives you BOTH things. It only feels redundant because there are no mechanics like the ones I've outlined above.
| Rubia |
Hmm...
Let's consider Oracles with UMD and this item...
Let's say I have a PC with at least one level of Oracle and a huge UMD modifier. My PC puts on a Ring of Revelation, containing a revelation which is outside his mystery; let's use Channel from Oracle of Life as an example. He then makes a UMD check and gets, say, a 35.
Am I correct in saying that he counts as a 15th-level Oracle when determining how large his Channels are?
-Matt
According to me, yes. What I'm trying to show is that you don't even need a level in oracle to do this.
Actually, I might be wrong depending on how hardcore you get with RAW.
Text from UMD:
You can use this skill to read a spell or to activate a magic item. Use Magic Device lets you use a magic item as if you had the spell ability or class features of another class, as if you were a different race, or as if you were of a different alignment.
That word "another" may not let you do it since you have a level in oracle, depending on just how hardcore you want to be with it. :)
| Rubia |
Serisan wrote:Ravingdork wrote:I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this thread.How's that, blindfolded man?
*Reaches into pocket, pulls out rotted eyeball, places it onto thread*
Like that. Maybe you shouldn't have asked. ;P
Are we providing enough entertainment for you? I wouldn't want to disappoint. :)
Also, I'm clearly bored.
Belafon
|
I'm not sure that's right. Activation is "starting", but UMD has a provision for maintaining items that have continuous effects---make a check once per hour.Rubia
The tricky thing here is that "While wearing the ring, an oracle has access to that revelation and may use it as if she had it as a normal class feature.". Combine that with "this skill does not actually let you use the class features of another class." The ring isn't directly giving you an ability, it's adding to your class feature (Revelations).
I can definitely follow the logic that this means you simply can't use the ring unless you have oracle levels. As a matter of fact after further reflection I think I would agree with this interpretation. Ignore my post above, putting these two side-by-side seems to make it pretty clear to me that UMD doesn't let you use a Ring of Revelations.
.
.
.
Well- technically you could UMD to add the revelation in the ring to your list of revelations. However since you still can't use Revelations, it does you absolutely no good.
| Rubia |
Rubia wrote:
I'm not sure that's right. Activation is "starting", but UMD has a provision for maintaining items that have continuous effects---make a check once per hour.Rubia
The tricky thing here is that "While wearing the ring, an oracle has access to that revelation and may use it as if she had it as a normal class feature.". Combine that with "this skill does not actually let you use the class features of another class." The ring isn't directly giving you an ability, it's adding to your class feature (Revelations).
It's tricker than that. You're emulating the mystery but not using it. The ring grants you access and the ability to use a revelation (a case of specific trumps general), not the skill. You aren't hitting the limitation of the UMD skill, because you aren't in fact, using the mystery at all. And the revelation use is coming from the ring, not the mystery (that you emulated).
It does work, and it shatters your newer interpretation that you were stating. (Also see the hardcore lawyering argument a few posts up about whether an oracle with a different mystery can actually use it or not.)
Matthew Morris
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
To get more confusing... Can an anti-paladin (as an alternative Paladin) pretend to be LG and use UMD to fool the sword?
Can a Paladin of Freedom or Tyrany (Unearthed Arcana) do it?
More seriously, I'm hung up on that sentence at the end of the description. Why call it out in that one case when (at the time of writing) no one else has a mystery. I look at it as calling out "If you UMD to look like an Oracle, it won't work, because you're still not an Oracle."
Where the Holy Sword doesn't have that written.
As to emulate class feature vs emulate class... I can be persuaded that the holy sword wouldn't 'turn on' but then we're back to that line of text calling out non-oracles gaining no benefit from the ring.
Basically I read it as 'you look like a duck, you quack like a duck, but you're not a duck, it doesn't work.'