Thread topics that can get you baned


Off-Topic Discussions

51 to 100 of 210 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Dark Archive

Gnomes are weaksauce, and Pathfinder is going to fail for including them, instead of, like any sane person, getting rid of them like 4E did.**

Iconic X is lame and indicative of how little Jason Buhlman understands 'how things work' and how much the game would have been better if only he'd listened to my very important playtest feedback, because said Iconic would be completely helpless in the face of something that his/her class was never designed to deal with anyway, and I could blow him/her away with the following selections of spells, feats, items and fuzzy rules interpretations culled from sixteen different books, some of which have been reprinted (but I am using the 'pre-nerf' versions of), that nobody in their right mind ever have prepared, since the character would be useless in any other situation, ever (and not have been able to survive to the level necessary to achieve this overclocked and overspecialized combination), but always shows up in my arguments as an example of how *everyone* should design their characters.

**See also; Half-Orcs. Monks. Druids. Clerics. Fighters. Full of Fail. Unplayable. CoDzilla. Broken. Each another shining example of why Pathfinder will fail. Oh yes. By not reactively over-reacting to a vociferous minority that is trapped in a perpetual state of hysterical and hyberbolic over-reaction, Pathfinder's designers have proven that they Just. Don't. GET IT!

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder moves to 4th Edition


Masika wrote:
Pathfinder moves to 4th Edition

Kill! Kill, kill, kill!!! KILL!!!

~GRINS~

RPG Superstar 2012

Set wrote:

Gnomes are weaksauce, and Pathfinder is going to fail for including them, instead of, like any sane person, getting rid of them like 4E did.**

Iconic X is lame and indicative of how little Jason Buhlman understands 'how things work' and how much the game would have been better if only he'd listened to my very important playtest feedback, because said Iconic would be completely helpless in the face of something that his/her class was never designed to deal with anyway, and I could blow him/her away with the following selections of spells, feats, items and fuzzy rules interpretations culled from sixteen different books, some of which have been reprinted (but I am using the 'pre-nerf' versions of), that nobody in their right mind ever have prepared, since the character would be useless in any other situation, ever (and not have been able to survive to the level necessary to achieve this overclocked and overspecialized combination), but always shows up in my arguments as an example of how *everyone* should design their characters.

**See also; Half-Orcs. Monks. Druids. Clerics. Fighters. Full of Fail. Unplayable. CoDzilla. Broken. Each another shining example of why Pathfinder will fail. Oh yes. By not reactively over-reacting to a vociferous minority that is trapped in a perpetual state of hysterical and hyberbolic over-reaction, Pathfinder's designers have proven that they Just. Don't. GET IT!

Dayam! That's a long thread title! :)


Those two would be encouraged, actually. Similarly to
1,000,000 Ways to Beat Up Sharoth
'Cause it's just so easy.
EDIT: Heh, badly ninjaed.

Liberty's Edge

Sharoth wrote:
Modern torture techniques for use on Kobolds.

Modern "interrogation techniques" for use on "kobolds."


Advocating an annual "Talk Like a Puddle Day"

Liberty's Edge

Kobold Cleaver wrote:

Those two would be encouraged, actually. Similarly to

1,000,000 Ways to Beat Up Sharoth
'Cause it's just so easy.
EDIT: Heh, badly ninjaed.

It's the fault of the Postmonster.

Liberty's Edge

Gark the Goblin wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:

Those two would be encouraged, actually. Similarly to

1,000,000 Ways to Beat Up Sharoth
'Cause it's just so easy.
EDIT: Heh, badly ninjaed.
It's the fault of the Postmonster.

And that could be a good banned thread title.

Liberty's Edge Contributor, RPG Superstar 2012

This one won't get you banned, but it would get shut down pretty quickly:

"What would it take to get a restraining order from a Paizo employee?"

Liberty's Edge

taig wrote:

This one won't get you banned, but it would get shut down pretty quickly:

"What would it take to get a restraining order from a Paizo employee?"

Yes. And they don't get you banned, the thread title is just banned.


Gark the Goblin wrote:
Sharoth wrote:
Modern torture techniques for use on Kobolds.
Modern "interrogation techniques" for use on "kobolds."

I believe you mean "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques".


Gark the Goblin wrote:


Okay, so how do we join the Texan guerrilla movement?

You have to be born a member!


what about one titled

shit piss f%&# cunt cocksucker motherf~+~er tits

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8

"Vomit Guy Lives"


Celestial Healer wrote:

Ok, I give in...

"The pornographic picture forum"

"The Pathfinder beta contains hidden Satanic messages!"

"I have disproven the existence of God"

"I heard Obama is going to make everyone play 4e"

"Which Paizo employees have you slept with?"

Are these gonna be panel discussions at Gen Con this year? I'm particularly interested in the first and last one...especially if there is film involved. Heh.

Silver Crusade

I would like to propose that my earlier suggestion of "Which Paizo employees have you slept with?" should win the thread. You have to admit, with nothing more than that title, it would get shut down immediately before anyone even had a chance to respond... just in case.

RPG Superstar 2012

Celestial Healer wrote:
I would like to propose that my earlier suggestion of "Which Paizo employees have you slept with?" should win the thread. You have to admit, with nothing more than that title, it would get shut down immediately before anyone even had a chance to respond... just in case.

We could try it out as an experiment. :)


Disclaimer: This is a thought experiment. You asked for thread topics that could result in a ban. I came up with these...

Spoiler:

Religious people should be isolated and treated to avoid the meme spreading.

There was no Jesus Christ.

Islam is the greatest threat to secular society.

The first world war was an invasion of Iraq.

Americans are kept stupid for a reason.

Why are so many marijuana smokers in prison for longer than rapists?

The CIA smuggled cocaine into the united states, and helped turn it into crack.

There are only five media companies in America, and all of them are corrupt.

Holland is the land of the free. France is the home of the brave.

Hitler was a good catholic.

How to make nitroglicerine, and turn it into plastique.

Aircraft hijacking made easy.

How to start a war in Iran, and make it seem like it isn't about the oil.

What to do about the millions of americans who want to end the world.

Canadians are pussies.

Monkeywrenching tips. From Aircraft grounding to Zoo release.

Why white people get shorter prison sentences.

Dimethyltriptamine and how to synthesise it from benzine.

Grow your own hydroponic skunk.

I am sure I could think of more, but these are a few off the top of my head. I would not discuss any of them on Paizo, because it is a welcome escape from my normal preoccupations.

Silver Crusade

taig wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
I would like to propose that my earlier suggestion of "Which Paizo employees have you slept with?" should win the thread. You have to admit, with nothing more than that title, it would get shut down immediately before anyone even had a chance to respond... just in case.
We could try it out as an experiment. :)

Hmmph. Gary must be asleep at the switch... Did they all sleep in today?


Celestial Healer wrote:
Gary must be asleep at the switch... Did they all sleep in today?

Nah, they're all hung over from drinking, partying, and sleeping with each oth-{BANNED}


Some possible thread titles that I came up with:

R2D2 is My favorite Star Trek Character
Erik Mona is a Terrorist
Katanas! Katanas! Katanas! (Oh wait, that's the Wizards messageboards)


Katanas. LMAO.

Oh, by the way, I did see a great documentary about katanas on the History Channel...

Liberty's Edge Contributor, RPG Superstar 2012

DoveArrow wrote:
  • Katanas! Katanas! Katanas! (Oh wait, that's the Wizards messageboards)
  • You've piqued my curiosity with that one, but we can't talk about other boards on this one, so I'll just have to use my imagination. :)


    ...why would I want a hydroponic sk....oh, wait. I see.

    How about a thread about zoophilliac 4V4A (which would involve a double DVDA)?


    taig wrote:
    You've piqued my curiosity with that one. :)

    I wasn't actually there for it, but a WizO told me that there were a few rather enthusiastic fanb0is a while back who got into some pretty heated disputes about how much damage a katana should do in D&D. I guess the discussions got so heated that they had to ban the topic for a while.

    RPG Superstar 2012

    1 person marked this as a favorite.
    drunken_nomad wrote:

    ...why would I want a hydroponic sk....oh, wait. I see.

    How about a thread about zoophilliac 4V4A (which would involve a double DVDA)?

    I Googled DVDA, and wish I could take it back.

    RPG Superstar 2012

    DoveArrow wrote:
    taig wrote:
    You've piqued my curiosity with that one. :)
    I wasn't actually there for it, but a WizO told me that there were a few rather enthusiastic fanb0is a while back who got into some pretty heated disputes about how much damage a katana should do in D&D. I guess the discussions got so heated that they had to ban the topic for a while.

    Thanks! How much damage should a katana do? :)


    taig wrote:
    How much damage should a katana do? :)

    Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. :)

    The Exchange

    DoveArrow wrote:
    taig wrote:
    You've piqued my curiosity with that one. :)
    I wasn't actually there for it, but a WizO told me that there were a few rather enthusiastic fanb0is a while back who got into some pretty heated disputes about how much damage a katana should do in D&D. I guess the discussions got so heated that they had to ban the topic for a while.

    Actually, it's worse than that. The topic has been banned several times. Every once in awhile they will lift that ban, give it a 'trial run' and pretty fast there is a multi-page flamefest going on, and it gets banned again.


    Sock Puppet wrote:

    Disclaimer: This is a thought experiment. You asked for thread topics that could result in a ban. I came up with these...

    ** spoiler omitted **

    I am sure I could think of more, but these are a few off the top of my head. I would not discuss any of them on Paizo, because it is a welcome escape from my normal preoccupations.

    Dude! You're a little too good at this!

    Paizo Employee Director of Narrative

    Invader Smee wrote:
    Sock Puppet wrote:

    Disclaimer: This is a thought experiment. You asked for thread topics that could result in a ban. I came up with these...

    ** spoiler omitted **

    I am sure I could think of more, but these are a few off the top of my head. I would not discuss any of them on Paizo, because it is a welcome escape from my normal preoccupations.

    Dude! You're a little too good at this!

    He's one of our resident geniuses. It's almost gross how good he is.

    Liberty's Edge

    drunken_nomad wrote:

    what about one titled

    s&~& piss f!#! c#&@ c~*~@ucker motherf!#!er t!*@

    Up until the end I thought you were citing the Blink 182 song.

    Dark Archive

    Eh ? What happened to all my suggestions that I posted here ?


    DoveArrow wrote:
    taig wrote:
    How much damage should a katana do? :)
    Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. :)

    HEY! That is NOT a joking matter!

    An Essay on the Katana

    Spoiler:
    Just joking.

    Liberty's Edge

    Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
    DoveArrow wrote:
    taig wrote:
    How much damage should a katana do? :)
    Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. :)

    HEY! That is NOT a joking matter!

    An Essay on the Katana

    ** spoiler omitted **

    "Why katanas are an important part of the game, the controversy surrounding them, and my calculations of proper damage":

    Spoiler:
    The title is longer than the essay.

    The Exchange RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8

    Sock Puppet wrote:

    Disclaimer: This is a thought experiment. You asked for thread topics that could result in a ban. I came up with these...

    ** spoiler omitted **

    I am sure I could think of more, but these are a few off the top of my head. I would not discuss any of them on Paizo, because it is a welcome escape from my normal preoccupations.

    I don't see why discussing Canadians love of domesticated felines would get anyone banned.

    Liberty's Edge

    Tarren Dei wrote:
    Sock Puppet wrote:

    Disclaimer: This is a thought experiment. You asked for thread topics that could result in a ban. I came up with these...

    ** spoiler omitted **

    I am sure I could think of more, but these are a few off the top of my head. I would not discuss any of them on Paizo, because it is a welcome escape from my normal preoccupations.

    I don't see why discussing Canadians love of domesticated felines would get anyone banned.

    No, they are cats. The French are all really cats too, but they have Poles pose for their photos to continue the myth. That's why the poodles hate them.


    "What's the Character Limit for a Single Post?"
    "The Yapping Thread"
    "The 'how fast can we get closed' Thread"


    Gark the Goblin wrote:
    "Why katanas are an important part of the game, the controversy surrounding them, and my calculations of proper damage"

    It's like a magnet for ninja fanbois.


    Masika wrote:
    Pathfinder moves to Hero System

    Fixed for ya.

    Sovereign Court

    CourtFool wrote:
    Gark the Goblin wrote:
    "Why katanas are an important part of the game, the controversy surrounding them, and my calculations of proper damage"
    It's like a magnet for ninja fanbois.

    Just one more reason why pirates are better.


    Callous Jack wrote:
    Just one more reason why pirates are better.

    WHAT?!?! NINJAS ARE WAY BETTER!!! WHY I'LL HAVE YOU KN-{Baned}

    Sovereign Court

    DoveArrow wrote:
    Callous Jack wrote:
    Just one more reason why pirates are better.
    WHAT?!?! NINJAS ARE WAY BETTER!!! WHY I'LL HAVE YOU KN-{Baned}

    Hey, the flag button does work!


    DoveArrow wrote:
    Callous Jack wrote:
    Just one more reason why pirates are better.
    WHAT?!?! NINJAS ARE WAY BETTER!!! WHY I'LL HAVE YOU KN-{Baned}

    Is it impossible to say 'banned' or something?

    Guess I'll see...
    Also, ninjas could probably beat pirates in their chosen scenario. Pirates would win in their own.
    But Vikings could beat both. |:)

    Sovereign Court

    Kobold Cleaver wrote:
    DoveArrow wrote:
    Callous Jack wrote:
    Just one more reason why pirates are better.
    WHAT?!?! NINJAS ARE WAY BETTER!!! WHY I'LL HAVE YOU KN-{Baned}

    Is it impossible to say 'banned' or something?

    Guess I'll see...
    Also, ninjas could probably beat pirates in their chosen scenario. Pirates would win in their own.
    But Vikings could beat both. |:)

    You should be "baned."

    ;-)

    Liberty's Edge

    !!! BANE'D !!!


    Kobold Cleaver wrote:
    Is it impossible to say 'banned' or something?

    Kobold Cleaver you have been 'baned.'

    Reason: You failed to recognize that my use of the word 'baned' was a play on the thread's topic. This offense is particularly egregious, since you failed to recognize that I use proper grammar and spelling in almost all of my posts, even though we have had many conversations together.

    Date when bane will be released: When you use the word 'baned' properly in a sentence.

    Paizo Employee Senior Software Developer

    someone wrote:
    "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa (a billion times)...

    Ow. My eyes. Please don't do that. (It's funny in the "forums are way too long" thread but not so much elsewhere.)


    DoveArrow wrote:
    Kobold Cleaver wrote:
    Is it impossible to say 'banned' or something?

    Kobold Cleaver you have been 'baned.'

    Reason: You failed to recognize that my use of the word 'baned' was a play on the thread's topic. This offense is particularly egregious, since you failed to recognize that I use proper grammar and spelling in almost all of my posts, even though we have had many conversations together.

    Date when bane will be released: When you use the word 'baned' properly in a sentence.

    DoveArrow, you have been 'dubed as annoying'.

    ;)
    Reason: Failed to recognize that I was not making fun of your spelling, but asking whether it was disallowed for whatever reason to use the word 'banned'. You also apparently failed to realize that I was responding to posts stating ideas similar to my own.
    Date when dub will be released: When you apologize for your foolish mistake.

    51 to 100 of 210 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
    Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Thread topics that can get you baned All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in.