![]()
![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Squark wrote: I appreciate the trait and hope it makes it back into PF2 as well, but they do need to be a little careful. This shouldn't be applied to haste, for example, lest dragons consuming potions of swiftness massacre entire parties. That just turns a combat situation into an roleplaying situation where the parties come up with ways to dissuade the dragon from going full ham. I see it as win-win, personally, because it allows for truly awesome roleplaying design in systems. :> ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() I've found the game more enjoyable since alignment has been removed. It's helped funnel the folks who are truly edgelordian to other games and systems, which makes for a more fun play experience. It also enables folks to actually be existent entities working with other existing entities without fear of 'sudden random power failure' for 'oops, that person you helped was EBIL'. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Alaryth wrote: Its a benefict for the people on GenCon...on a quite elitist way, on my point of view. That won't get an argument from me. I've been unable to go to Gen Con for five years now due to multiple health and safety concerns. Thinking though is that their system can't handle a graduated rollout, which would be a thing. Hopefully it rolls out at the time I'm thinking, because 1000 Pacific will have some very angry con-goers treating the store team poorly. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() No, it makes a kind of sense, if they are aiming for a Gen Con Exhibit Hall 'live' time would be 1000 AM Eastern/0900 Central/0800 Mountain/0700 Pacific. And since it would be a traditional 'draw' to Gen Con, they probably did the timing to match up with that, because otherwise there would be some Customer Service issues. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote:
So Abadar, then? ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() I'm looking forward to the rework removing some of the 'clunkiness' of my Tengu Fist of the Ruby Phoenix Champion of Sun Wukong. Being able to actually pursue Justice while being a follower of the Monkey King instead of being sort of pigeon-holed to Liberator is refreshing. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Arbalester wrote:
It's a knock-down effect of the Drift Crash. It's effectively easier to get to Pulronis from the Pact Worlds (and vice-versa) via Drift 2.0's 'Drift Lanes' than it is to use the 'traditional route'. There are also a TON of interplanar disturbances in the Vesk system, so flying 'conventionally' via non-Drift things is also a very risky situation. At least, that's the nutshell IIRC. Others who are more Starfinder lore-savvy please feel free to correct and/or adjust. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() BookBird wrote: I'm pretty happy with most of the stuff we have right now and coming up in Howl of the Wild. Always love more ancestries of course, but we're at a good point. I'd still like to get some Darklands ancestries (Xulgath, Sekmin) and some Arcadian ancestries (Rougarou, Wyrwood), maybe something from Casmaron if we ever go there. Other than that, we've got a lot of options already. Selfishly, I might also like if Harpy sometime becomes an ancestry, or some other "generic bird" ancestry which would be less restrictive than Tengu (appearance wise), more humanoid than Awakened Animal, and less humanoid than Strix. But that's pretty damn specific and redundant. I could see Harpy as a regional variant of Strix with bad hygiene and press issues. And it's not redundant and the specificity is what I'm interested in, too. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Paizo and Artificial Intelligence This would probably be a better fit in homebrew? ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Martials still need amplification to 'catch up' to casters, if we are going to revive that old tired thought-chain. I have very rarely run into 'cheerleading' from casters. If anything, Casters throw out a craptonne of rockets and let the martials 'catch up'. The perfect blend of support/blast is hard to find. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() The Raven Black wrote:
That would become incredibly annoying and once again highlight the problems of the Rarity system. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() The big thing for PF2 Shifter if one is in the works is to allow folks to stay in forms indefinitely from the entry gate without putting too much of a malus on the character. Claws? Big deal. Ancestries have them, as do multiple classes.
And the list goes on. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() graystone wrote: I'm not going to get too excited about making characters until i see what the rarity of them are; if they are Rare, there isn't a reason to expect I'll get to use it right away. Well, hopefully with the Tian Xia books coming out where dragons are so commonplace one can't sneeze without having to take them into consideration, they'll be Uncommon? ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Ootoya FOREVER! Yayyyy art of Lady Jingxi! With possible Annoyed Action Pose of What did my husband do THIS TIME?? I have to get it out of my brain about The Great Flood... You are warned...:
Human snake-a-pede... Human snake-a-pede... Some city's gettin' flattened tonight... I'm loving what I've seen of the .pdf so far, and have put the hard copy on order despite space issues because so many questions that have been bugging me are getting answered! ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() The Raven Black wrote:
My brain may be conflating the two, because it was exceedingly rare that G folks 'fought to the death' but folks who had the E were seemingly always doing it. I'm really curious to see how the factions will define on this one. I just hope it's not like the PFS1 Scenario Red Harvest where it was scripted to be IMPOSSIBLE to get the factions to sit down and talk to each other. That would be a waste of narrative space, imo. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Ravingdork wrote:
The general consensus among the people I know is that acknowledging all aspects of one's Ancestry is more important than the arbitrary delineation by a bunch of folks in some bureaucracy and welcome the change. EDIT: For a Versatile Human ancestry I'd probably suggest something like Arodenian (since Aroden viewed himself as God of Humanity) or some other term that encompassed enough of Humanity without being bigoted. Not saying the idea of Human as a Versatile Ancestry is bad, just suggesting stepping away from historically bad things. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Kavlor wrote:
That gets EXCEPTIONALLY problematic because of the racist connotations IRL. It is why they stepped to Aiuvarin (mixed elf ancestry) and Dromarr (mixed orc ancestry) Putting 'Half' on something implies 'lesser' rather than 'better', and there's a whole section of society that leans into it. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() CorvusMask wrote:
And in shocking news, detaching arbitrary morality judgements allows for more flexible writing with opponents that may or may not be wrong, just looking at the world through a different lens. I'm hopeful that in this arc (and others) that the flexibility gained allows for more options and outcomes beyond 'They all fight to the death because they are (alignment)'. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Irnk, Dead-Eye's Prodigal wrote:
In addition, the game is a lot more 'flexible' to adjust to such in PF2 (I would submit even moreso after ReMaster) than it was in PF1. There have already been androids as an Ancestry published, along with their Feats which should help lay a roadmap. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() VerBeeker wrote:
Also the Matanji from the Mwangi Expanse, come to think of it. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() It would be a neat and efficient way to step 'away' from 'Dragon Disciple' (which is probably OGL on some level) plus hearken back to Legacy of Dragons (from PF1) ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() zimmerwald1915 wrote:
In addition, the Pathfinder Society more than likely. The organization has a relationship with the orcs in the region dating back at least to Season 8 of PFS(1). ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() And the deity aspect was put in place specifically to prevent folks from going "Oh, we murdered Pharasma in one round so we're all immortal now" and trying to make the claim that it covered everyone (or inspire other tables to do the same). By not giving the deities statblocks, if memory serves, it becomes solely up to the GM if that's the story they want to tell -- and it will only hold for that table. So really curious to see how that is maintained while things are going down. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Sibelius Eos Owm wrote:
And also punked hard by Iomedae's crew to get her to 'dying'. 'By accident', of course. But it looks like she got some beach time and is recharged and in-charge. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote:
GS: "Sorry, dear, you're not my type. Unless you want to spec over to greatswords?" ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Vee8 wrote:
Saloc: "Ah, this is a pretty cushy gig, might get someone every couple of centuries, maybe a false alarm and... WTF!!!" ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Now, another option that'd be totally on-brand is Gorum feeling his essence being 'sucked out' by whatever thing is going on and going "You know what? I choose a different strategy. You Lose." And then self-shanking hard enough to break the ritual and send parts of himself everywhere.
|