Vistcoatis's page

neceros wrote:

I'd have to agree.

The blinking is a different source, and normally I wouldn't allow concealment to double stack like that, but he's already got the downside of concealment versus himself.

I'd have to say that normal concealment, no matter the source, doesn't stack, but blinking gets another check simply because you may not actually be there psychically.

I would say the following:

From PRD - Combat - Concealment: "...Multiple concealment conditions do not stack." AND

1) If attack is capable of striking ethereal creatures:
Cloak of Displacement grants displacement which works like BLUR and (20% concealment)and BLUR grants concealment (20%) and Ring of Blinking 20% concealment).
So: 20% final miss chance.

2) If not capable of striking ethereal creatures:
Cloak of Displacement grants displacement which works like BLUR and (20% concealment)and BLUR grants concealment (20%) and Ring of Blinking (50% MISS CHANCE but NOT concealment - you are simply not there to be attacked).
So: 50% final miss chance for determining if you are there and can be hit at all and then 20% miss chance from cloak because of concealment.

Ok I think this makes sense, thanks!

We have a guy in our party trying to cheez a rules involving concealment, but I think his interpretation is all wrong. So I am search for approval/Disapproval regarding concealment affects.

Here is the question if someone has a cloak of displacement minor, a ring of blinking, and the lighting stance do you receive a check for all those as concealment(miss chance)or do you just take the highest one, and move on.
The book seems to define all miss chances as concealment, and therefore i am partial to thinking that you can not have more of the same effects stacked up, but dude claims they are from different sources and therefore a roll must be made against each. What say ye?