Verse |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I think it's better to alter the things you don't like for your game but to deal with the technical wording of the spell, why couldn't I use 4 small stone blocks as feet and cast the spell to merge with them and be supported by them. This would allow it to be cast without native stone outcroppings.
I really like this spell and hate to give up the environments that I can use it in. So a bit of rule lawyering..
While I understand the point you're making, your statement here simplistically glosses over points made earlier, seemingly because you just like the spell and want to use it wherever you like.
The spell is worded in such a way for a reason, not as a technicality, and ignoring this as you are results in an already excellent spell in certain circumstances becoming excellent in a staggering number of situations.
Instead of pretending the wording doesn't mean what it does, think of alternatives to create barriers in situations where stone isn't available (and to be sure, were a player of mine to spend a few actions throwing small stone blocks around the battlefield and then try wall of stone, I'd have to ask how a few small bricks are going to "solidly support" a massive stone wall).
To be fair, if that player instead threw a bead of 'dust of dryness' that had sucked up 100 gallons of water into a battle on a grassy field, then used 'transmute mud to rock', I'd let it adversely affect everyone in the area and then let the player go nuts with wall of stone, and probably throw him or her a bonus as well for being awesome.