My players are just about to start Fortress of the Stone Giants, so naturally I've been reading through the whole chapter, and found something a bit confusing. I was hoping other GMs might be able to clarify:
At the end of the chapter (p 233 in the Anniversary edition) are some Knowledge check results for using the ancient Thassilonian library to learn more about Karzoug and Xin-Shalast. They say things like "Xin-Shalast is a legendary lost city...", "Stories hold that Xin-Shalast had gold streets..." etc.
But the books in the library have been there since the fall of Thassilon, right? They're all written in Thassilonian, and the clockwork librarian has been alone in the library for some 10,000 years.
So my question is, if the books were written before the fall of Thassilon, surely they would be worded differently? Xin-Shalast wouldn't be referred to as a 'lost city' at all, and any stories or legends about it would simply be facts.
I wanted to know if anyone else had thought about this at all? My reason for thinking about this at all is my desire to create some 'pages' from the books in the ancient library as handouts for my players.