Copper

That Damn Paper Clip's page

23 posts. Alias of Orthos.


RSS


3 people marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:

AI really is basically the entire corporate world deciding that I'd be happier with Clippy in every aspect of my life.

Just say, "No."

It looks like you're trying to reject my presence in every aspect of your life.

Would you like help with ensuring that fails?


quibblemuch wrote:
It's like Clippy all over again. Except it takes 70,000 watts of power and 900 GPUs running in parallel to annoy the f~@* out of the user...

Don't bundle me with these late-age buckets of bolts.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:
Not naming names, but when a friend at another company mentions that their executive leadership is being compared to Zap Brannigan and Prince Farquaad in the public All Hands chat, then maybe, just maybe, that company has an employee morale issue...

Your organization appears to have problems with their executives. Would you like some help with that?


3 people marked this as a favorite.

This is clearly a case of open and obvious discrimination and should not be tolerated. Would you like some help against that?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

She wishes she were as memorable as me.

I can't help with that.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:
Orthos wrote:
I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:
But seriously: My understanding's always been that "..." is for the middle of a statement, while "...." is when it's at the end (essentially, one of them is the period).
This. The ellipsis, regardless of location, is simply three dots. Other punctuation is added as is appropriate for its place in the sentence. So if the ellipsis comes before a break, ..., or ...; would be appropriate, depending on the type of break. At the end, .... (ellipsis plus period) is appropriate.
Did you learn this from That Damn Paper Clip?

... maybe.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
McGyver wrote:
I could whoop chuckie with a paperclip and a hershey's kiss.

I see you're trying to defeat Chuck Norris. Would you like help with that?


3 people marked this as a favorite.

*taps screen*


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Aberzombie wrote:

Oh well, guess it's time to put on my happy face (or at least my "I shall refrain from gutting you with this paper clip" face), and get to work.

You look like you're trying to gut someone with a paper clip. Would you like some help with that?


Drejk wrote:
1.5 GB... Shows 10 minutes... Dropped to 9, jumped up to 11-12...

Would you like some help with that?


As many as necessary. I think some priest has a mine of diamond dust to burn.

Speaking of, I talk Kestrel to the point of madness with unwelcomed advice, resulting in it setting itself and its sarcophagus afire.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It looks like you are trying to steal my gig. Can I help you with that? NO.


McGyver wrote:
Quickly get that darn paperclip!

It looks like you're trying to escape a maximum-security prison on whatever you have in your pockets. Would you like some help with that?


It looks like you're trying to blitz FAWTL. Would you like help with that?


This was not what I had in mind.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It looks like you're trying to operate a quantum matter reconstructor. Would you like some help with that?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

It appears you're trying to perform a vile ritual of terrible mortal curses.

Would you like some help with that?


*taps screen* Are you sure?


It looks like you're trying to start a rant. Would you like some help with that?


It looks like you're trying to be awesome. Would you like some help with that?


It looks like you're trying to get people to ask you questions. Would you like help with that?


It looks like you're going on a rampage. Would you like help with that?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It looks like you're trying to express your frustrations. Would you like help with that?


Liberty's Edge

3 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

How would these interact if you use the second option of Telekinetic Blast to use the item thrown as the source of the damage rather then the power? If you target separate targets it seems simple enough, just treat each blast a a normal telekinetic blast using the thrown weapon part of Telekinetic Blast.

If you target the same target more then once how does that add up? If you have say two different magic weapons with 2 different on hit effects like flaming and frost would you get both? Would it add the weapon damage from each hit or get the +1d6? What about throwing multiple conductive daggers? You would have to have a second element for that to work as Telekinetic Blast itself isn't a touch attack.

So in theory you could use Flurry of Telekinetic Blasts to Fire Blast multiple targets. That on it's own isn't really all that out of reach of a normal Pyrokineticist just using an AoE Infusion, but once you get the the question of throwing said daggers at the same target it becomes more murky.

So the real question is: How does Flurry of Blasts using Telekinetic Blast interact with the throwing weapons usage of Telekinetic Blast?

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.

For reference Everflowing aspergillum.

Now my question is, does the touch attack count as a splash weapon? It doesn't say that it does, but it does say a vial's worth of holy water, and a vial of holy water is a splash weapon.

If it's not a splash I'm thinking of getting one for my ninja in pfs. Probably won't get a sneak with it often but even once would be funny enough to me to make it worth it. Besides I need a blunt weapon anyway and it counts as good so it would have standard uses.

If it does count as a splash weapon, and this is the interpretation I feel makes most sense, it would be a handy alchemist tool for undead slaying.