This presents a problem for me, being a female gamer. By skirting the pregnancy issue, you've essentially cut out an important part of a female character's life, if the DM and player decide to go down that road. In a system that seems much more "grown up" than many of the other tabletop RPGs, an issue like this would be something I would expect to see you guys take head on.
I don't see your argument for promoting something by making an item to aid in it. Doesn't this happen when you make evil items? Does this mean you condone the evil doing that may or may not happen, or does it mean you made the items, put them out for public use, and let the DMs and players decide the morality behind it?
If PR is a problem, how is pregnancy more of an issue than, say, the implied rape and masturbation in Book of the Damned Vol. 2, Lords of Chaos, or what Ogres are implied to do? Sure, you're not painting it in a good light, but it's out there for player use. Why is it unacceptable to put pregnancy items out in much the same manner, or rather, put them out in a neutral way and let the players decide, much the same way evil items are handled?
I understand that pregnancy can make people feel a bit uncomfortable, especially in a violent role playing setting, but so can rape and masturbation, especially to a girlgeek. DMs and players can leave these things out of their game if they wish, but the items and concepts are still there and fleshed out for players who wish to include it in their game. I suppose I feel that if Paizo can include such adult topics as dead children, rape and masturbation, pregnancy should be fairly easy.
Thanks :)