Djinni

RogerC's page

24 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.




While we wait, I thought it might be fun to look at some wondrous items in the SRD as though they were entrants in the contest, and pretend to be judges.

First, some losers:

Bag of Holding: Incredibly popular, but essentially a very prosaic item. The fixed weight is a nice mechanic. The interactions with the Portable Hole are needlessly-convoluted. The aura of conjuration is a bit strange. All in all, I'd say the Handy Haversack is a better superstar. Thumbs down.

Belt of Dwarvenkind: Thematically pure, but there's an awful lot going on with this one. Too much, in my opinion. Compared to other items that provide darkvision, I think it's underpriced. The aura of divination borders on bizarre. I kinda like the idea but I don't like this implementation. Thumbs down.

And some winners:

Dust of Dryness: A clever little item with some clever uses. I like the theme here and how it is used. The abilities show a nice variety, with a combat application and a non-combat application. As a DM who knows a character has this, I can think up some locations and encounters that would bring it into play. And as a one-charge item (more or less) it's reasonably-priced and won't break the game. Thumbs up.

Glove of Storing: A good simple idea that is well-implemented. It might be a bit overpriced -- I'd let this into my game priced at one or two thousand, I think. As a DM, I can think of some good uses a villain could put this to. Appeals to a wide variety of character concepts. Thumbs up.

Feel free to play along, everyone!

Cheers,
Roger


Pushed the big shiny Submit button, and now all my worries are over and it's just a small matter of waiting...

I know we can't really discuss our submissions as such. Still, I find myself curious as to what form of objects will be most popular. Will there be a glut of capes? A crate of candles? Apparatuses of every description? Only the judges know for sure...

Feel free to chime in (oh yeah, chimes...) once you've submitted too.

Cheers,
Roger