Paladin Alignment's page

26 posts. Alias of Crimson Jester.


RSS


SMITE HIM


Smite Him


I will Smite you all.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Why waste your vote?


They may not...


it is like killing baby goblins.


heart and soul


Goblins have rights? Where is this written,

Oh, I guess they do have rights. Well damnit I can't have that new beach house.


:-P


Lets not.


TriOmegaZero wrote:
Oh alignment threads. You never cease to amuse me...

They. Are. So. Much. Fun.


1)No, only a Paladin. Not a Monk weapon.
2)Nuggets.


No...


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Any paladins with Alignment issues? Do they go to Meineke?


I yam what I yam


Atonement... Atonement ...we don't need no stinking atonement!


No such thing.


Callous Jack wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:

I'm personally tempted to enjoy the "evil/good president/assassin" movement, but in reality it's a touch too esoteric to really play outside the OTD. For the foreseeable future, it is likely to remain a cult success. It certainly doesn't have the caché of "Is this Evil?" or "Caster V. Martial".

Presidential alignments just don't rile the geeks, I suppose.

It would if someone had Evil Obama, Lawful Good Bush or Chaotic Neutral Clinton.
But how would that help it break out of the gulag that is OTD? Nope. Aligned presidents is a dead end.
Think about the possibilities in the alignment/paladin threads...

Oh I have..... And it is beauty incarnate.


He should not waste a Smite. Now on the other hand if they are irredeemably EVIL and you as the GM know this and agree with this, then yes he should. On the other hand if they are not and he does so, well he should immediately loose all Paladin abilities.

EDIT: I love the 100% doesn't mean 100%

Of course in a game it is true, the GM can choose it to not be so.


It does not matter


It does not matter


I disagree.


I disagree.


I disagree.


Aberzombie wrote:
I have a sudden urge to make an alias named "Everyone".

I disagree.


I disagree.