Matías Torino's page

Before reading, a little disclaimer: English is not my first language, so I apologize in advance for any mistakes and bad spelling you can encounter in this long thread.

Rise of the Runelords and Pathfinder RPG have been an important part of my life since I started GMing this adventure path. Eight years ago. Yes. It took our group eight years to complete it. It was a very long, difficult, some times tedious, sometimes epic, and sometimes incredibly fun experience, so I wanted to write my thoughts about running it, its design, and Pathfinder RPG in general.

I hope my experience is useful to other people, being them GMs looking to run this AP or designers looking to write more adventures like it.

Before explaining myself in detail -this is going to be a long thread- here is a quick review for those barbarians who doesn't want to read a lot:

Overall, I think Rise of the Runelords was not good. Nor was it bad. It was excellent at first, but quickly became a much worse game experience. It has a lot of great stuff but is riddled with design and story problems that made my life as a game master a nightmare, and almost completely drained my players's willingness to keep playing.

I want to highlight that the worse aspects of Rise of the Runelords have more to do with Pathfinder RPG's system than any other component of its design. So I believe that using another game system could make this campaign much better.

If you are looking for a mega campaign to invest some years of play in it, I really recommend you to look somewhere else unless you are willing to convert everything to another game system. In which case, Rise of the Runelords could be a good and fun experience.

Overall Rate: 4 out of 10 using Pathfinder RPG. Maybe a 7 out of 10 using a better system.

I'm sorry for being so harsh. There's a lot of good things to say about Rise of the Runelords. But for every good thing, there are a lot of bad experiences hidden in this AP. I respect Paizo’s writers and game designers, so having started this thread with some cold and harsh statements, I'll now jump to the nice stuff.

Oh! Before that, here’s some context: my playgroup and I are from Buenos Aires, Argentina. We played a lot of D&D 3.X before this adventure path. We played lots of RPGA and Dungeon Magazine modules and a lot of other games. But we never finished a long campaign. So, eight years ago, I decided to change that.

Our group had played and enjoyed the first modules of Age of Worms, but we couldn’t keep playing it and eventually we abandoned it. But the Adventure Paths seemed great so I chose the most recommended one: Rise of the Runelords. I adapted it to the Forgotten Realms and started the longest campaign we ever played with my group.

You should also know that I am a fair GM and try to run every game by the book. I don’t fudge dice rolls, I take my time to properly apply the rules and interactions. I surely made mistakes, but what I’m trying to say is that I made every possible effort to run Rise of the Runelords the way it was written and supposed to work. Spoiler: I eventually had to make some adjustments to the game because PFRPG was breaking, but I never changed my GM philosophy.

Also, keep in mind that we started playing with 3.5 rules and changed to Pathfinder RPG around the 3rd module.

So, now that you know my mindset and my group experience, here are the reasons my group and I loved Rise of the Runelords and Pathfinder RPG.

Rise of the Runelords: the Good Stuff

Rise of the Runelords is a mega campaign that will take your players from 1st to 18th level. Its super long and complete. If you want to commit to a long game, Rise of the Runelords may be for you. Kudos to Paizo: this was your first campaign for Golarion and it has everything a D&D game should have. I can only imagine how much of a titanic work it was to write and design it. Respect!

Rise of the Runelords is generic fantasy in the best possible way. You can drop this campaign in almost any setting. I used the Unapproachable East from the Forgotten Realms CS 3rd Edition and had no problems running it. If your setting of choice has an ancient evil empire, giants, ogres, cultists and goblins, you can surely run RotRL in it with little effort.

Excellent cities. Sandpoint -the starting town-, the Hinterlands, Magnimar and Turtleback Ferry are perfectly described and made this AP super rich. My players were always talking about this locations and the people they met there and some of our most memorable moments happened in those places.

Great adventure sites. Thistletop and Fort Rannik were some of the best dungeons and adventure locations of the campaign. They were evocative, fun and a LOT happened there. I'll probably add both locations to future campaigns.

Nualia, Tsuto Kaijitsu, Brutasmus, Alden Foxglove and Xanesha were great villains. Each had a different interesting thing going on, and my players were always talking about them with a combination of awe and hate.

The horror subtheme of the campaign was perfect. It was not fully a horror campaign, but everything was tainted by really messed up stuff. My players had amazing reactions to Foxglove Manor, the Skinsaw Cult, the Hook Mountain ogres and half-ogres and the Catacombs of Wrath. Some areas of Runeforge were also nice and the Wendigo siege was an incredible and evocative piece of terror.

Goblins. They are fun.

There is a lot of interesting reading for the GM. Even if it was not useful nor impactful, I loved some NPC's backstories and some location details. Reading this AP was a fun experience. And having read A LOT of bad and mediocre AD&D, 3E and 4E modules, I can say that Paizo's writers are on a completely different level. Sometimes you made me laugh, sometimes you gave me the chills and sometimes you just made me say: “Wow! That’s awesme!” I have some issues with style and design, but overall, the reason a love Paizo is for your writing skills. And they really show in Rise of the Runelords.

Pathfinder RPG: The Good Stuff

This game was a good 3.5 successor in the times me and my playgroup were tired of that system. Pathfinder RPG introduced a lot of changes that made sense to us and, as a result, we chose it over 4E D&D.

Also, Wayne Reynolds is my favourite fantasy artist. So he was a big part on my decision to buy this books.

I’m sorry I don’t have many good things to say about this game. Almost everything I like about PFRPG is rooted on D&D 3.X so I don’t think talking about the good aspects of the d20 System has anything to add to my review.

Rise of the Runelords: the Bad Stuff

Having talked about the good aspects of Rise of the Runelords and Pathfinder RPG, it is time for me to talk about the bad stuff. And boy, I have a lot to say about that. But please, don't take it as an insult: the fact that I dedicated 8 years of my life to this Adventure Path and game should speak greatly about how much I enjoyed it. Sadly, I feel that you could improve a lot in order to write more amazing APs and better games.

So. I think Rise of the Runelords was not very good overall. What happened?

The second part of the campaign happened.

Fortress of the Stone Giants, Sins of the Saviors and The Spires of Xin Shalast are bad adventures. They suck. Each has its own reasons to be bad, but they all have some elements in common:

They are high level. I’ll talk about that and why it is bad later, when I write about Pathfinder RPG. Suffice to say that high level play is boring because of the game system.

They are -for the most part- just big dungeons in remote locations. This adventures happen in far away lands, detached from the towns and NPCs that made this Adventure Path so engaging. By default, you have no Ameiko Kaijitsu to talk to here. No Rusty Dragon to rest in. No Black Arrows to help. No mundane problems nor familiar faces. The first three modules are a mix of wilderness and city encounters. You can talk to a lot of people, learn a lot of things about culture and politics and have a lot of opportunities to roleplay your character. But in the big weird dungeons of the second half of the campaign, all that is lost. The AP becomes a more focused hack and slash adventure and it is worse for it.

The mystery behind the Sihedron Rune has no good payoff. A lot of what drives the first modules is the Sihedron Rune and the mystery that surrounds it. Is it all connected? Why? How? Who's behind Nualia, the Skinsaw Man and the ogres?

Underlying all that mystery was a series of convoluted contrivances that were too weird to understand. My players had a difficult time piecing it all together and by the end they just shrugged and just killed every villain they encountered. I think they thought the Sihedron Rune and everything seemed disconnected at first and expected it to make a lot of sense at the end. They wanted a final revelation that explained why this six modules where The Rise of the Runelords and how each piece fell into an amazing big picture. They didn’t want an adventure that goes like "An aasimar wants to burn Sandpoint and has a weird medallion, a group of murderers work for a serpent lady, some ogres attack the Black Arrows, then there are giants, and a sin dungeon and then you go to a wizard's city and that was all connected because... someone awakened the Runelord and he needed sacrifices and stuff."

The villains are bad characters. Mokmurian is just there to die at the end of his dungeon. Each sin dungeon at Runeforge has a boss who's just there to die. Karzoug is just there to die. They all have no personality, no interesting goal, no chance to negotiate and no real link to the players. The same is true for some of the first villains... except that Nualia has allies with personalities and has strong ties to the starting town. She doesn't want to conquer the world, she wants to burn that horrible town because Sandpoint's inhabitants made her life terrible and a demon messed her up. The Skinsaw Man has a mad crush on the players and had a tragic backstory. The Skinsaw Cult operates in the player's territory and messes directly with them. Also, they are connected to Nualia's weird medallion and at that point in the adventure, players are super invested in the Sihedron mystery. The Hook Mountain ogres want to conquer a specific place full of people the players can empathize with. Even if they are just ogres sieging a fortress, they have a concrete goal that the players can understand and antagonize

Jorgenfist has almost no people to empathize with. Mokmurian has no ties to the human world and, at this point of the adventure, the Sihedron mystery is quickly losing its appeal. The adventure hook is weak: giants attack the player's turf because... reasons. This adventure could have worked if Mokmurian was present at the first attack and directly interacted with the players, maybe killing some important NPCs like Ameiko or Shallelu. Then, the adventure should have been about other locations besides Jorgenfist were the players could learn about or keep interacting with Mokmurian. Also, Mokmurian should have real hate for humans in his backstory.

Runeforge is kinda lame. No villain give the players time to learn about them. No villain knows about the players, so they are just there waiting to be murdered because they are evil. By default, they react to the players sudden appearance in their demiplane secret dungeon in the worst possible way: attacking without questioning. They are all mad, but have interesting motivations, relationships and backstories... that doesn't matter because they just want to kill the PCs. This dungeon could be better if players could start each encounter in a friendly way with the bosses. For example, when I was tired of running this dungeon, I did just that. When my players met Jordimandus (or whatever was Sloth mage's name) I just roleplayed him as a tired and lazy guy who wanted to end the PCs threat to Runeforge by just giving them whatever they wanted and be done with it. I regret not doing exactly the same with each wizard to encourage the players to make alliances and immerse themselves in the politics of mad sin wizards and demons. But, that was my work, not the original adventure as was written.

Lastly, Karzoug is the worst. He was not interesting. Just an evil wizard with god complex. Nothing in his backstory is interesting. He’s only defining trait is that he was powerful. And the Runelord of Greed. But his actions are not defined by greed. He wants to rule the world. Like every other powerful mage ever. Rule the world is the motivation for greedy characters, wrathful characters, prideful characters… even lazy Runelords wanted to rule the world. So he is nothing special. Also, he is not particularly cunning, nor vicius, nor tragic, nor empathic. He is just evil. An evil wizard and that's it. He was like, a slave or something. But that didn’t define his character nor his motivation. At least Mokmurian had some kind of motivation based on his backstory: he was hated by his people and wanted revenge. Players could actually see that he was different because of his short size and necromantic magic. Karzoug is just evil.

But that's not the only problem with Karzoug. I can accept an evil wizard as a main villain if during the course of the campaign he is shown to be as powerful as the adventure suggests he is. Karzoug appears as the ultimate evil in the third half of this long campaign as a puppet master behind the other puppet masters behind the mysterious Sihedron rune. And he doesn’t do anything. The world doesn’t change because of this fact. He just waits to be killed in the Eye of Avarice, fully knowing that a group of adventurers are going after his head and, so far, succeeded thwarting each of his plans.

Also, nobody besides the PCs and some intimate NPCs know about him. So the world around the players doesn’t care about Karzoug, and his impending return is not threatening nor spectacular at all.

I made a lot of effort to correct this problem. I shouldn't had to do it, but I needed my players to keep invested in the campaign after 6 years of play. So I worked on it.

Here’s what I did

(Skip this if you are not interested in Rise of the Runelords fan fiction)

I don’t claim that my approach was better. I understand that an AP like this should be more generic and you have a limited amount of space to write each module. But I think some effort dedicated to make Karzoug a real threat to the world and to see what kind of person was he could have worked better for the campaign. And even when I made a lot of effort to show him as an unstoppable threat to the world, my players thought Karzoug was lame and underdeveloped. So I think he should have been introduced earlier in the AP with a more interesting personality.

Aside from those three last modules, I think other stuff also made my GMing experience a frustrating nightmare:

The encounters are generally badly designed. I’ll not talk about the system, but about the ideas and execution behind a lot of encounters. Also, this is not true for the first half of the AP.
A lot of important encounters have creatures too big to freely move in the map. There were too many -Too many!- encounters were the PCs succeeded because the enemies just couldn’t properly fight. And the weird thing was that the enemies lived in those tight spaces! The pace of combat was really harmed by this fact, as I was always spending too much time trying to figure out a way for the giants to move without provoking a ton of attacks of opportunity and die.

A lot of the important NPC spell casters had bad tactics. Like spending the first round of combat to buff themselves -and immediately dying before the following round- or casting area spells in maps that were not really suited for those. Or spent their actions doing something not impactful at all.

I felt like the writers just wrote the description of each area, selected monsters and spells and didn’t playtested how that could work out. 80% of the time it worked as the enemies downfall. They were not defeated by my players tactics, but by themselves!
Also, I would have liked a quick enemy stat block that showed me their primary attack using feats and abilities like Power Attack, so I didn’t have to make notes and math each time a giant monster appeared. Also, some notes about how some spells worked or affected the enemy or the map could have been useful. And some tips like “don’t forget this or that ability!” -specially for core monsters that were not included in the book- would have been nice. I’m sure that I spent more time searching rules and spells and making math for feats than each other GM task combined.

Don’t get me wrong. The ideas behind all encounters were usually amazing. Sadly, the execution was not.

The Eye of Avarice and the Pinnacle of Avarice were the worst offenders. The Pinnacle’s map was impossibly big, impossible to draw in a battle map because everything was BIG AND ROUND, and not really suited for rune giants. I had to print all the dungeon maps in 30+ pages just to speed up the exploration and combats in this area. The Eye of Avarice at least was small and squared, but had too many features that made impossible for the dragon to move and for Karzoug to cast area spells. Karzoug was supposed to cast some wall spells to defend himself but when I tried to draw the walls… there was no room for them because there were no large areas -everything was a 10’ platform or stair- and a rune giant was occupying almost all the free space. Also, he was supposed to cast some offensive area spells… but walls and spells don’t mix well… so I had to improvise A LOT with a 20th level wizard just to make him a threat. I had to spend probably two hours of gameplay just searching for rules of spells I didn’t expected to use when I first read this encounter. And yes… he was easily defeated without doing almost anything and I think a lot of that has to do with his tactics.

Maybe it was my fault that so many enemies died before doing anything relevant and I should have adjusted the tactics to my players. And a lot of times I did. Knowing how almost every enemy was defeated before his or her second turn, I started ignoring suboptimal actions. And that made me spend a lot of playtime looking for ways to make an enemy do something useful instead of casting a spell and dying.

Also, as I said early in this thread, I had to make adjustments because the game was breaking and I wanted the enemies alive for more than one round. I never cheated dice rolls, but I almost always had to add from 50 to 200 hp to enemies before any combat hoping they will last more than a two rounds. This, in addition to more “minions” to balance a 5 player party. And I think this is not an adventure design error, but a system one. But I bring this up just to explain how badly designed were almost all high level encounters. I can’t believe players having problems with the high level adventures, as my players are not powergamers nor good min maxers.

And, as you can imagine, low level encounters were so much better because there were less spellcasters taking poorly thought actions, less bookkeeping, and less giant creatures cramped in relatively small spaces. And Pathfinder -and other 3.x systems- just works better at low levels.

Lastly, regarding adventure design, I hated how a lot of interesting reading and characters were not important because all what I just wrote above. Amazing characters just exploded into blood and bones the first round of combat if they lost the initiative, complex backstories just didn’t mattered because combat was tedious and by the time each encounter ended, my players were tired and frustrated with everything related to the game and wanted to move on. And, as I said… a lot of enemies were complex but instead of showing how interesting they were, their default tactic was to attack and fight to their deaths.

Some examples of this were the kobold barbarian in Jorgenfist that I thought was super interesting and never got to do anything cool; Ceoptra and Kalib, who tried to do cool things and lasted only two rounds each; and Karzoug, who casted two quickened time stops gaining 5 free rounds for each (PURE LUCK, I SWEAR!!!)... and couldn’t do anything interesting with that because wall spells and bad map design.

Rise of the Runelords is excellent during the first three modules. And you can run them as stand alone adventures and are excellent. But as the power level scalates, the adventures become just dungeons and all the mystery is lost, you start to lose interest in the campaign and end up frustrated with how much time you are losing each sesion trying to play this AP.

And that has to be, as I said earlier, because the mayor problem of Rise of the Runelords is Pathfinder RPG.

So, here is my rant about Pathfinder.

Pathfinder RPG: the Bad Stuff

I think PFRPG was a good idea in theory but in reality just made my life as a GM and player worse. More options seemed good and fun, but in reality my playgroup spent a lot more time trying to decide their actions or trying to resolve some rules affected by a giant combo of feats, abilities and spells.

When I was tired of 3.5 I thought that I wanted a cleaner system. And Pathfinder gave me that without going the 4E rute of prioritizing the mechanics over the roleplaying aspect. Less skills, a maneuver system, etc. That sounded nice! And then I realized that in some places the game was cleaner and in other places -much more important places- it had become even more complex and slow.

More feats for monsters made them more difficult to use. More little specific bonuses for my players made us usually go back in time to apply some obscure bonus or penalty we forgot in order to be fair with them. Better combat classes made them more fun, but also super deadly and difficult to challenge with monsters as written. Some parts of the magic system were better, but it was still the same bad 3rd edition system full of complex interactions that make high level play boring and slow, and made every interesting challenge -like climbing the tallest mountain in the world- kinda worthless. 3.X games have just too much information to possibly run them and play them as written and the magic system breaks almost all adventures.

Also, the game seams to break around 8th level.

For me, it is no coincidence that Rise of the Runelords starts being amazing the first three modules and sucks from the 4th to the end. At that point PC’s power starts to deviate from the monster’s power, creating a bigger gap between them each level.

I made a lot of adjustments to my player’s characters equipment just to maintain a lesser power gap, but it was impossible. They obliterated almost all enemies in one or two rounds. As I said, I added big chunks of hp to almost every enemy, hoping they will live enough to present a good fight. That never worked. Pathfinder PCs are overpowered and there’s nothing you can do about it that doesn’t involve directly searching for weak spots to kill them. And the problem with that strategy is that it requires a lot of preparation work from your part as a GM, you can’t do it a lot because it becomes obvious and boring, and the funny thing about weak spots in 3.X games is that they tend to be deadly.

As a GM I want to challenge my players, but PFRPG high level plays in a way that is super easy unless I spend a lot of time creating ways of really kill their characters. Like there’s no inbetween.
I don’t want to go rule by rule explaining what worked for me and what not. This thread is already too long and, as a new edition of PFRPG is being developed, I think all this stuff should be already popular knowledge.

The Modules, One by One

Lastly, here’s a quick review of every module.

Burnt Offerings: Excellent! 9/10. You can run it as a stand alone adventure and link Nualia and the Sihedron rune to whatever you want -Its really not very important in the overall story and you can probably came up with a better plot-. The Catacombs of Wrath and Thistletop are excellent dungeons and Sandpoint is a perfect starting town for adventures.

The best part in our campaign: when the party was captured by Nualia and Brutasmus tortured them. They eventually escaped and took sweet revenge on the bugbear. The worst part: when they tried three times to fight Erylium without cold iron weapons. We played this in the 3.5 module version. I think the Anniversary Edition fixed this issue. The interesting thing about Erilyum was that because of their quest to create cold iron weapons, the party was dubbed The Cold Iron Company and the name stuck for the rest of the campaign. Also good: the goblins!

The Skinsaw Murders: Pretty Good! 8/10. You can also run this as a stand alone module for the same reasons I said before. This is a fun investigation adventure with the sweet horror elements that Paizo is known for. A lot of amazing encounters and locations.

The best part: When our barbarian player was so scared and paranoid that he threw a mirror from the balcony of Foxglove Manor, believing it was cursed -it was not-. Another one was when our fighter player pushed the angel statue on top of the Clock Tower, making it all collapse in an attempt to defeat Xanesha. It didn’t kill Xanesha but saved the day. Epic demolition! Also: Alden Foxglove. The worst: There’s nothing particularly bad in this adventure. I think it lacked more encounters in Magnimar, some red hearings and a little more mystery. Having more roleplaying opportunities with Judge Ironbriar would also make it better.

The Hook Mountain Massacre: Pretty Good! 7/10. Another perfect stand alone adventure. Now, the players explore the wilderness and a fort in the middle of nowhere. The half ogres are the most horrible things I read about, and the heart of the adventure -reclaiming the Fort- was incredibly fun.

The best part: When the ogres returned with a big force, commanded by Lucrecia and Xanesha, to retake the Fort from the players. Epic battle! Revenge on the lamias! The worst: the other parts of the adventure feel disconnected and Barl is a boring villain that starts the trend of puppeteers behind puppeteers. Also, I would liked it better if it was still near Sandpoint.

Fortress of the Stone Giants: Mediocre. 4/10. This is just a dungeon with giants. Not much to do here besides fighting. My players found it boring to play. I found it boring to read. Mokmurian sucks.

The best: the starting giant invasion on Sandpoint was interesting! The worst: my players couldn’t remember anything about this module, so I think the worst thing is that it was not even remembered as bad.

Sins of the Saviors: Bad. 2/10. This is a dungeon related to the seven deadly sins. Mechanically speaking, I think it delivers a playable dungeon. But it does not play the “sin theme” very well mechanically. There are a lot of villains that do nothing interesting. They are just crazy and evil. There are a lot of factions but there is no story.

The best: a little bit of roleplay with the guy saved from the succubus. Also, the players defeat a white dragon! The worst: I don’t like the idea of the Runeforged weapons. Or, best said, I don’t like the “negate 3 transmutation spells” power. I remembered the real worst: here is when the players discover that every enemy they defeated helped Karzoug! So… it was supposed to be like a plot twist, but it wasn’t. It’s not like they had the choice not to kill some of them and it really doesn’t matter. The adventure pregresses exactly the same regardless of how many Sihedron people the players kill. So, for this to make sense, there should be some kind of greed counter and the last adventure should change based on that counter. Maybe a “clock” in a Tassilion ruin like Thistletop?

The Spires of Xin Shalast: Kinda Bad and Disappointing. 3/10. This is the culmination of a long campaign. And it ends in a lost city of gold! That is an amazing premise! Sadly, the length of the adventure is too small for the scope and complexity of this module. The trip to Xin Shalast and some random encounters could have been shorter and more pages could have been used to make the city a better adventure location. The encounters are easy unless you try to fight your way to Karzoug through all the giants in the same room.

The Best: the Wendigo Siege was amazing and is probably one of the best encounters in the whole campaign. Also, that time when my players killed Karzoug as he was crying in frustration and anger. That was satisfying for everyone. Also, the campaign epilogue that has nothing to do with what was written in the AP but has our heroes departing to the outer planes in search of more adventures. The Worst: the biggest and roundest dungeon ever created. Specially designed to test my patience. Also: Leng was another element introduced at the last possible time to make the plot even less understandable.

Last Thoughts

I don’t believe every game group encounters this problems. I also don’t think a lot of people play this long. This is what happened to my players and I playing Rise of the Runelords with Pathfinder RPG from low level to 18th level, using only the Core Rulebook and the Advanced Player’s Guide.

Rise of the Runelords took us 8 years, not because of the length of the AP but because of life reasons. We had jobs, relationships, other hobbies, etc. But I must say that as the AP progressed, my players and I were becoming more and more frustrated with its story and the game’s mechanics. So we experienced long hiatuses. We went from weekly long sessions, to monthly short sessions, to “please, just come so we can finish this” sessions. Life always gets in the way of gaming, but I know we could have finished this AP in like 3 years if the quality was as good as it started.

As I said at some point before: this game -imperfect as it is- gave me and my friends years worth of adventures and fun. I enjoyed reading and running parts of it and we collected a giant -no pun intended- amount of anecdotes and fun that will stay with us forever. As one of the players said when we finally finished the campaign: “there are not many things you do for as long as 8 years”. And he is right. It was a good ride. My rant is just accumulated frustration that I hope can help someone figure out how to best enjoy roleplaying games, how to design for people like me, and what was the experience of a game group that played for so much time the most famous adventure path Paizo ever wrote.

And, if any Paizo designer is reading this: sorry for the critique. I hope it was not too harsh and that you can salvage something useful among all of what I said. Also, thank you for my last eight years of gaming.

I think a good sequel should have some of the following:

- Familiar places. Sandpoint should be important in at least one adventure. Revisiting some of the old dungeons could be very interesting. I think Thistletop would make a good low level dungeon to revisit, or an interesting high level lair of a dragon or something.

- Familiar faces. Ameiko, Shalelu and the others should appear or at least be mentioned. Some of the old enemies should appear again. Maybe one of Nualia's party, the Skinsaw men, an ogrekin, a lamia and, of course, giants.

- Similar themes. I think the original AP is more about fighting giants than fighting Runelords (though I haven't read all the adventures yet). Yeah, Mr. K. is the power behind everything, but the players spend a lot of their time fighting giants and defending themselves against the giant army. I think a Runelord should be in the sequel, but I'll do it more 'Against the Giants' oriented.

- Different places. At least one arc of the AP should be in a new and unexpected environment. Maybe, a lost island with underwater encounters, lost ships, and pirates. Others should be expected but new: fortresses, Thassilonian catacombs, etc.

- Different faces. Some changes should be made in towns and cities, so the players can feel the time has passed. Some old characters are dead, some young are now mature, some shops closed and new ones opened, some event changed a lot of things, etc.

- Mystery: because it's an important part of the first AP, but also because players now know a lot about the Runelords, the Sihedron Rune, etc. I think the events of the first campaign should be completely known to the new characters, so they can talk and role-play without the fear of metagaming. And you can use that knowledge against them: if they discover a dungeon with the seven pointed star, they will know that's important to the adventure, they will know that it will probably be dangerous and they will feel rewarded for their knowledge and participation on the previous events.

I think that a sequel should play against the player's expectations. They will surely think that a sequel will have to do with another Runelord, that Sandpoint will be the starting friendly town, that the sihedron rune will mean problems, that all sexy women will probably be lamias in disguise, and that sooner or later they will face giants. I think the best course of action would be to deliver some of their expectations but in ways that they will never expect them.

What if Sandpoint is not the friendly town they remember, but a decadent small city hat grew a lot thanks to the Cathedral and now is full of crime and untrustworthy people? What if the sihedron rune is now the adopted symbol of a new organization? What if the lamias are now their allies? (Amiko, the Lamia Matriarch renegade? :O) and what if this time the giants are a neutral faction that could go to war or remain in peace depending on the PC's actions.

Also, I wouldn't use another Runelord as a main villain. It's what everyone expects, but I think that would be too predictable. I would probably use some of the other Runelords, but not as villains but as faction leaders trying to acquire power but also tangled in a great mystery that plagues the region.

As a main villain, I would like a giant warlord, maybe an ancient ogre-mage who worked for Karzoug, or a frost giant jarl that wants to use some Thassilonian doomsday machine to create a frozen realm. Or... a mysterious mage-slayer who's great purpose is to kill all the Runelords and steal their powers.

Lastly, as a low level introductory adventure, I think a great start should be Chopper's Isle, because that was an interesting plot that never got explored in the original AP and would make the players think that all that time it was in reality a preview for the sequel.

Hope this ideas help you!

Rhada.

Eberron. By far.

I started playing AD&D in Greyhawk, a nice and simple setting. But when 3rd Edition was released I fell in love with the Forgotten Realms, which I previously knew thanks to the Baldur's Gate Saga and was thriving to play. I bought every FR book, from any edition, I could find. I read some R.A. Salvatore's novels and my fanaticism for the Realms reached it's maximum. I read some other authors and, despite that, kept being a fan. :P

But then I met Eberron.

At first I was "meh". After all, it didn't have the history and prestige of the Realms and I could just play "magi-tech" in the Shining South. But during the D&D 30th Aniversary I was handled the introductory adventure, "The Forgotten Forge", to GM during the Buenos Aires event. It is an incredible introductory adventure (since then, I played it 5 more times) and when I read it I got instantly hooked by Eberron. I bought the CS and had a totally different experience reading it than with Greyhawk or Forgotten or any other CS.

It was a well thought setting. It had a complete different personality. It addressed some of the problems other settings had and made a lot of twists to the same old fantasy cliches. Eberron has lots of good qualities, but for me, the most important two are these:

1- It is centered in the players. Al RPGs are centered in players, but Eberron put a lot of emphasis in the idea of players being the center of attention. In other settings, specially FR, PCs tend to be overshadowed by the 30th level NPCs who have the most interesting adventures. Of course any reasonable GM can change that fact, but that problem is fixed in the setting's core design.

2- It's a modern fantasy setting. People always say the distinctive aspect of the setting is the "magi-tech", but I don't agree with that. Yeah, magical technology is interesting and special, but the main difference is a cultural difference. Eberron is not a setting of kings, dragons and magical kingdoms. It is a setting about multinational enterprises, ambiguous churches, race problems, post-war societies, knowledge and scientific advancement, cultural clashes, progress, exploration of the unknown, politics and personal rights, and well, of course, dragons and magical kingdoms.

I realized that difference during a game in which a character got severely injured. What did the players do? They took him to the hospital. In traditional D&D, society is kind of a romantic semi-medieval one where injured people is taken, of course, to the magical healer. Where else would you take him? When the answer to that traditional D&D problem became "the House Jorasco Hospital", is started to see all those little differences. Eberron has magic, swords, wizards and a lot of traditional stuff, but is inhabited by modern people. People who are not ignorant peasants but educated city dwellers. People who read newspapers, keep frozen goods in a magical fridges, study in universities and work in corporations. People who lived a terrible war. Not an epic holly war against evil Sauron, but a gritty and dirty war against their neighbors.

Eberron has a lot of topics that in other settings can't be even imagined. Topics that resonate with more strength in us because we live in a very similar world, (magic and dragons left aside) with very similar problems, customs and opportunities for adventure. That's why is my favorite setting.

As a color note, I've been GMing a Rise of the Runelords campaign since 2010 set in the Forgotten Realms' Unapproachable East and I'm playing the Carrion Crown adventure path set in Golarion. I like both settings (specially Golarion) but to me, Eberron is the best one. Also, Planescape is my second favorite setting of all time.

Thanks for reading and excuse my English.

Rhada.