Loranys Moonshadow's page

I'm developing a campaign setting in which the only spellcasters are Sorcerers, with only one of each bloodline in existence at any time. The Sorcerers of the world have established a tyrannical ruler-ship over the populace, and will be the primary villains of the campaign. As such, all spellcasting classes will be off-limits to PCs. However, I would like to still allow Bards, Inquisitors, Paladins, and Rangers. All Rangers will have the Skirmisher archetype, so as to allow them without spellcasting. I would like help in developing similar archetypes for Bards, Inquisitors, and Paladins, so that the classes are still viable, albeit lacking spellcasting capabilities. Developing class archetypes is not my strong suit, so any thoughts/suggestions, no matter how bizarre, are welcome.

Note: Alchemists are not considered spellcasters for this purpose and will be completely allowed.

I am fleshing out my homebrew campaign setting and decided to allow my previously NPC exclusive races as playable. This is the current iteration, and I was looking for advice regarding the balance compared to core races, regarding the Artiari and Natlari especially, as they have unique features that I have difficulty determining the power level for.

I've made three homebrew races for my campaign setting, and will be playtesting them soon, but I would like an initial impression. They can be found here. Are they balanced with the core races? What changes, if any, could/should I make?