L33Fish |
I was never able to really grok the law/chaos alignment axis. Like why would someone be for or against rules for the sake of being for or against them?
That's why I came up with my own philosophical axis:
Absolutist - You believe that an action can be judged as right or wrong based upon the action. An absolutist might believe that killing is wrong or that disobedience is wrong.
Undecided - You have not given much thought to the philosophy of right and wrong, but instead go with what your gut tells you is good or bad. An undecided might believe that killing is usually wrong except if the person deserved it.
Consequentialist - You believe that an action should be judged based upon the outcomes it produces or was intended to produce. A consequentialist might believe that killing is morally wrong unless it saves more lives in the end.