
Cheeseweasel |
Chris Lambertz locked up a thread with this reasoning:
"We have a few threads discussing the women in gaming and various related topics. Whatever answer the original poster was seeking has been obscured by the off topic posts in this thread. In the future, please consider the messageboard rules before posting. Thread locked."
So, what? If a discussion runs into territory covered by an existing thread, we should all jump over there? We shouldn't have more than one thread covering an issue?
The OP of the thread has... excuse me, "had," been absent following the opening thereof; there is some (legitimate) question as to whether the OP was, in fact, seeking any answer at all.
Finally, while the discussion may have wandered away from the question (how to deal with a selfish player), it was not "off-topic." It was delving into the meta-issue of WHY a group has to deal with a selfish player.
Lots of accusations of sexism abounded, discussions about what constitutes sexist behavior, and whether one version of sexism is worse than another. Obviously a knotty issue, but it was, on the whole, civil discourse, an entertaining and intriguing conversation, one which I (and several others, quite obviously) was following with interest.
And now it's locked, and the "reasons" given are disingenuous at best. I'm usually happy with the moderation here, but this instance is disappointing.