Ikeren's page

29 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.



1 person marked this as a favorite.
Leithlen wrote:
This one is probably the most important one posted of all (emphasis mine):

Flatterer. :P


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm also glad to see them holding off a bit on full release, and am generally a fan of later releases over all. The game I played thus far has a lot of places where I'd reasonably expect any but particularly dedicated fans to walk away.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Quoting Ryan:
The biggest issue that will affect your play of the game is the amount of memory on the video card. The more memory on the card, the more textures and objects the card can display at a faster frame rate.

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p7dg&page=3?System-Requirements#140
1: Windows 7 Sony Vaio, 4GB Ram, dual 2.94 GHz CPUs, NVidia Geoforce G210M display adapter
2: Windows 7 Acer Aspire 4830T, 4GB Ram, quad 2.3 GHz CPUs, Intel Graphics 3000 display adapter. The Aspire has intel i5-2410m and the Vaio intel E7500.

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p7dg&page=3?System-Requirements#144
Operating System: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1
System Manufacturer: Custom
Processor: AMD FX(tm)-4170 Quad-Core CPU @ 4.2GHz ("4" cores...), always overclocked to 4.63Ghz
Memory: 8192MB RAM
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (I need to update my drivers, badly!)
Dedicated Memory: 8GB
OS Drive: OCZ Vertex 4 120GB SSD
Game Drive: Crucial M4 240GB SSD (needs a firmware update, badly!)
(copy-pasted some of this from Dario - thanks!)

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p7dg&page=3?System-Requirements#148
On "Fantastic" settings, my GTX 650 was only giving me about 25 FPS. I'm very glad that streaming didn't seem to change that, apparently because I have an i7 cpu, but would prefer a little more wiggle-room. I'm seriously contemplating getting my wife and me each a pair of GTX 760 cards and running them SLI.

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p7dg&page=4?System-Requirements#151
On a single gtx760, the game runs quite nicely. I'll up the settings to fantastic in a bit and see what happens, but my guess is it will run just as smoothly.

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p7dg&page=4?System-Requirements#161
OS - Windows 8.1
Processor - Intel Core i5-3230M CPU @ 2.6 ghz (4CPUs)
Memory - 6144 MB
Graphics - Intel HD Graphics 4000
Graphics Memory - 1792 MB
The graphics card is terrible for this Asus lappy, but I can run the game. In alpha now, I usually have around 15-35 FPS, it actually plays smoother the more battles I go into.

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p7dg&page=4?System-Requirements#196
Windows 7 32-bits
Core i5 650 3.2GHz
Hd Radeon 4850 1GB
Monitor 1440x900
4GB RAM
Running smooth on fastest setting, but having a good amount of crashes, if let alone in a corner do not crashes at all.

CPU: Basically everyone is using some I5 here, including some lower end ones. The exception is the single overclocked AMD FX4170.
RAM: A couple people are running with 4 GB's of RAM with some success.
GPU: People are running Pathfinder Online at lower settings on Integrated Intel HD 4000 Laptop GPU's. That's a pretty low power standard.

It seems like a good bet would be the level of Modest-Fair-Good on Logical Increments http://www.logicalincrements.com/ --- a 430$-600$ computer. But we're still on relatively few sources.