Search Posts
What irks me most about the rules so far, apart from the inconsistencies and balance issues, are the structure construction times, i.e. everything is done in a month. Youask for a palace? Give us a wad of cash, a few materials and a cycle of the moon; et voilà votre palais. This might be conceivable for a Practical Thaumocrat, but other rulerships? Has anyone taken the effort to cook something up or to adapt the PF1 Ultimate Rulership rules?
Absolutely nothing?! I‘ve just begun reading the Players Guide and have stumbled over the Feint War Action. Despite the missing check denomination, which has been mentioned in this forum; who is even going to try this utterly useless option? You use one action to, if successful, induce a -2 to the opposing AC for your next attack the same round under a -5 MAP because of the actions Attack trait. Essentially Slowing 1 yourself for a -3 to hit. Advanced tactics, my word! Or am I just not getting it? In case I actually did get it, I would propose changing the Attack trait to Manoeuvre and checking the same.
Some of my players do like the idea of some downtime sports. So, they‘re interested in playing the Basilisk. Unfortunately, the description in the travel guide is not only vague, but also contradictory. If one looks at the illustration of the Basilisk player, several issues arise: They are carrying a 12“ ball, called the Basilisk ball and a Scoop, that‘s supposed to „catch and throw a basilisk ball“. But the Basilisk is obviously by far to big to fit in the Scoop. Furthermore, they‘ve got their visor down, indicating they‘re carrying the 8“ Scoring ball, which is nowhere to be seen. So, either they confused the two balls, and the bigger one is actually the scoring ball, or the illustration is just a complete mess up. Has anyone tried and implemented the game in their campaign, and if so, how?
Greetings everyone, I‘m new to this edition, and I would like to play a low WIS, high CHA, rapier toting, Vanilla (i.e. CRB only) Cayden Cleric. Is that even practical? Thanks in advance for your insight! |
