FrostFox |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |
I'm creating this thread to be a better location for the discussion of the decision to recolor the Drow as the other thread is an improper location for such discourse considering its origin as a Gnoll discussion.
See here: Niche-Request Gnoll Ancestry Thread
As I expressed in that thread, I feel that the decision to make Drow Lilac in color (having looked at the Bestiary since they're more of a Baby Blue or at best Periwinkle - see below) is a poor one. It makes them non-threatening and even though the drow in the Bestiary front and center has an eye-patch he's downright -cute- (see picture: Bestiary Image of Drow ).
Color Comparison: Color Comparison Image
Color 1 = Baby Blue
Color 2 = Lilac
Color 3 = Periwinkle
Duergar get to keep their complexion, however: Duergar from Bestiary
In any number of directions to take the Drow, making them Baby Blue is not a direction I anticipated and have difficulty accepting them. I don't think anyone in the history of the existence of Drow, since their mention in 1977, has ever equated them with real life skin-tones or people.
I'm struggling to be open-minded about it, but in comparison with something like this?
Demonic Looking Drow - SFW
Ignoring the fact that said art has fiendish features (just horns really, the colored schlera are quite fitting).
As a fan of Drow, I can only advocate for at least having variety that allows for Drow to be of multitudinous shades as the baby blue representation has already had its first impression in the Bestiary.
I hope I'm not alone, but should any agree I would at least hope for civil discourse rather than spewing mindless vitriol.