Riftwarden

Cresting Tide Naiad's page

269 posts. Alias of Wei Ji the Learner.


RSS


the main spells in question are the heal spells they are divine and dont list the arcane focus for example

Delay Poison

School conjuration (healing); Level bard 2, cleric 2, druid 2, paladin 2, ranger 1

Casting Time 1 standard action

Components V, S, DF

Range touch

Target creature touched

Duration 1 hour/level

Saving Throw Fortitude negates (harmless); Spell Resistance yes (harmless)

unless im reading DF wrong


some spells on the with spell list require a divine focus but i didnt see in the desription anything saying what it would be or if you just dont need it my first thought was maybe its the familiar but if that were the case would you be able to cast those only if touching the famialiar, or within 1 mile of it


using the abilty to use your own point to prevent the eidolon from being destroyed could you not let the eidolons temp points stay very low and merely heal yourself somehow each time you spend a signifiacnt amount of points maitaining it or does the armor prevent you from healing yourself


essentially any system allowing a limb to be severed would constitute a form of sundering in relation to a person


i understant that but you said

Let me ask you, do you feel that in this game 'object' refers to a person?

Because a person can certainly be the 'object' of an investigation, but they don't spontaneously become an 'object' to the extent they are now treated like one in terms of game effects. If so provide a RAW example and I will bow to your victory.

so i gave you an instance wich give a by the rules situation where a person can be an object i also said at the beginning of my statement it wasnt what you were looking for merely showing that a person can be an object in certain situations your also overlooking the fact that it is a game and every possible situation could never be properly be defined in the system and if it could it would take more time than our lifespans you can what if all you want and attack everythign people have to say day but you have to be helpful at all the only thing youve succeeded at this whole time is being a "bully"(not sure how strict the language filters are so rather than be banned ill be childish) the original question was can it be done legally or reasonably you havent given an example of either at least other people have given ideas of house rules GM's might use in their tabletop games so please stop trolling and try to be helpful


not what your looking for by far but heres a rules example of a person being considered an object from Ultimate Combat a barabarian rage power

Body Bludgeon (Ex): While raging, if the barbarian pins an opponent that is smaller than her, she can then use that opponent as a two-handed improvised weapon that deals 1d8 points of bludgeoning damage, assuming the opponent is sized Small. Larger or smaller creatures used as a bludgeon deal damage based on their size using this base damage. A size Tiny creature deals 1d6 points of damage, a size Medium creature deals 1d10 points of damage, and so on. The barbarian can make a single attack using the pinned opponent as part of the action she uses to maintain the grapple, using her highest attack bonus. Whenever the barbarian hits using the pinned opponent as a weapon, she deals damage to her target normally, and the grappled opponent used as a bludgeon also takes the same damage she dealt to the target. If the pinned opponent is unable to resist being pinned for any reason, the barbarian can use that opponent as an improvised weapon without grappling or pinning the opponent, until the creature is reduced to 0 or fewer hit points, at which point the creature becomes useless as an improvised weapon. A barbarian must be at least 10th level before selecting this rage power.

my point with this is that in certain situations a person can in fact be considered an object unless you want to argue that weapons arent objects hope this helps your point mtd


1 person marked this as a favorite.

spell combat should work with ranged spell strike however youd have to specify that you were casting the spell first and putting it in the weapon before throwing it also im fairly certain youd need to use a dagger or something that counts as both a range weapon and a melee weapon but of course its all up to the GM at the end of the day if they allow some rules to be broken