Ask A Succubus Censor's page

The preceding post was censored by Ask A Succubus Censor! Keeping the internet exciting ever since the year minus dot!

That's quite enough for now, ladies. Let Ask A RPGSupersuccubus get on wth her 'wrapping things up' post.

On which note, in a moment I'm going to start cutting stuff...

Clark Peterson wrote:

This year there were a lot more items that were really well done from a technical "use the template properly" standpoint. Yes, there were lots that also did not, but those might have stood out so clearly because of how many did. I would say the number of "well crafted" items from a "compliance with the template" standpoint was up. That means you all as a community are learning--you are following the rules, reading the prior entries, reading the threads and improving your technical item execution skills. In the past we were able to say "good idea, bad execution." This year, we saw improved execution.

So good work!

But as a result, there were a ton of items that were rejected with these comments: "Good job with the template, very good work. But now you just need that good core idea" because a superstar entry has to have both--a good core idea and great execution of that idea, including good technical presentation using the provided template.

I love not only how the contestants grow over the course of a contest, but also how this community has grown and improved from contest to contest. It is really cool to see.

On the Ning Nang Nong...

-Milligan

This Charles Evans 25 post was bounced around, sat upon, and generally squelched until only the content which made (non)sense remained.

Neil Spicer wrote:

Alas, I'll likely be sitting this issue out, Tim. Too much going on. And I'm on deadline again for Paizo with much to do. Sadly, this will be the first issue of Wayfinder I've missed.

But... but... but...

You're The Spicemeister. You can...
This post was curtailed by Ask A Succubus Censor.

<rolls eyes>

Dear Mr. Pett,
A number of my sister succubi were going to group together to sing you 'Happy Birthday, Mr. President', but I have had to censor it on the basis that it could cause non-beneficial lasting damage to a number of people and institutions which actually matter.
So wishing you many happy returns instead.

Yours,

Ask A Succubus Censor.

Lucy Fury wrote:

Further Edit added by Ask A Succubus Censor:

I'll let that pass - this time - but I'm seriously considering telling Holly to take you off her favoured client list.

You wouldn't dare!

Push this one much further and you'll find out for sure, one way or another...

...I have given Ultimate Magic (as of the time of my posting this in version 4.0 of the review) a 1 star review....

<blah, blah, stuff>

I'll pass it this time, but push this pontification much further, and I'm going to have to insist on a 'pet armchair' alias for future such posts...

Ask A Succubus Censor, dealing in much needed (non)sense

Question

...Pointy Lego bricks,

Solnes does Solnes type things,
Many tentacled spawn...
<This post was savagely edited by Ask A Succubus Censor>

Now, now.

crazy tired depressed rave

This post was censored by Ask A Succubus Censor.

Yes, well: That was deliciously poetic, but from the point of view of not melting a hole of pure despair and insanity in the fabric of the messageboards a simple 'Blow it, I really don't think I can write anything meaningful and on-theme' would have done.

Provocative stuff. Uhh, no, but not provocative in that way....

If it weren't that you might take it as an invitation to go on a date I'd tell you to 'play nice'.

And we have formula, 21st century version.

The kids will buy it.

Soon i will be live in hulver.

This post was edited for poetry and chaos by Ask A Succubus Censor.

Aaargh!

;)

We'll have none of that, thank you. I'm sure he was speaking rhetorically.

Well it's me or the dwarven barrister. And he just removes the stuff altogether. I artistically trim it down.

Ask A Succubus Censor wrote:

And then a dragon (the one that represented wotc) sat on the troll.

Not sat. That h was no typo.

Dear Mr. Chaosman,

Ask A Succubus Censor.
Putting the bounce back in bouncy. In a purely bunny rabbit... oh dear, this isn't working is it? Let's just leave it there...

Edit:
And, it's about time to take a planeshift out of this thread and wait for the dust to settle from a safe distance...

stuff

Dear Chaos Man,

Hunt down the troll is like this: People complain about some things said. So they made a troll (the D&D monster) in front of a PC and grumbled about all the pop plan. And then a dragon (the one that represented wotc) sat on the troll.
Those who had these complaints considered this to mean: Two trolls a pretty month.
Not an unreasonable interpretation I think.
Real or not, people sat that way. They sad wotc never apologise, or even say ah a ally ent.
As I said: Doesn't even matter people were acting, if you comment on pretty mad guilt.

Hoping that this post has cast a new light on the situation. ;)

Ask A Succubus Censor.

Bringing much needed chaos and real meaning to Paizo messageboards since June 2011.

Harrumph. I shall have to have words with that barrister the next time that I see him.

<flounces off in a huff>

<removes unbelievably groan inducing pun>

Well that's simplifying things considerably, but you could be considered approximately correct.

Smagnavast the Black wrote:

This is not how you hijack a thread. Everyone knows that you need some ma_d__s t_ _a__sh. And some knights as crunchy snacks.

That was not what I wrote.

Fixed it for you. ;)

Am I worthy to be addressed by a member of the Great and Worshipful Ask A Succubus sisterhood? Please? Pretty, pretty please? With flowers?

Oh very well then. But only this once, and don't get any big ideas about how important this should make you feel, since I'm the junior most one at present.

An the ver e.

<Deletes as applicable>

Rûmlin has now gone away to engage in some banging-his-head-against-the-wall before having a lie down somewhere nice and quiet. I really don't know what he expects me to do about someone like Lucy Fury, but the thought's been made and I can't be unthought now.
Trying to get back on topic, I'm torn between advising all writers to blot out the words 'devil', 'Asmodeus', and 'Lawful' from contributions (unless it involves extreme humiliation of such beings) which would be the responsible thing to do (from a succubus' perspective) and keeping shtum about it because - for the love of Shelyn - I'm a succubus, and we're supposed to approve of flighty and irresponsible.
You know, a succubus censor is starting to seem more and more silly by the moment... Excellent!
Fortunately, being only a censor I'm not supposed to engage in Punishment (which would be definitely far too lawful) and merely supposed to make sure that usage of words which not many like very much (I suppose 'income tax' qualifies here) is kept to a minimum.
Please remember that articles may end up in anthologies. Be mindful of the publishing laws and so forth of the United States and that certain things may make it Very Hard for your story to be selected for such honouring.
Okay, I have to go away and do some work on my profile now.
<Wanders off>