Anatidae's page

Hi Customer Service!

Can you please cancel my subscription to the Adventure Card Game?

Thanks!

Hurray!

Thanks guys!

He can Abundant Step straight to my front door, right?

Curse my dice obsession!

Ok, can you please just ship the figurine, then?

Thanks

Oh, if the figure is ready, please send them both. Thanks!

Hi Customer Service!

Can you please separate Sajan from my dice and ship said dice when you can? Not sure how long Sajan will be on backorder, and I don't really want to wait for that to come around before I get my dice.

Thanks!

Hi Customer Service!

I was wondering if you had a tracking number for the above order. It was supposed to have shipped on the 10th, but I still have not gotten it.

Thanks!

Hi Sara!

Can you please check on my order? I made it about a month ago, and it's still pending :( :( :(

Thanks

Great news! Thanks SAra!

Hi Paizo

I made this order on Jan. 3. It is now Feb 15, and it still has not shipped. The three items appear to be rotating the backorder/pending statuses. I'm assuming this thing won't ship until all three items are in stock.

Since I really don't wish to wait for this to happen, can you either cancel this order, or split it into 3 separate orders?

Thanks

I clicked on this thread expecting to see a conversation about aeronautical engineering :(

Rapid shot penalizes the attack roll, which is above and beyond your base attack bonus. A tenth level fighter has a bab of +10, he then adds his str, say +5, then rolls a 17 on a d20. His attack roll is now 32. Rapid shot says take two away from that. He is still using his full bab, and he's still taking a -2 to his attack roll.

Yes, cults were smashed, crates were saved and books were slashed, much fun was had! "we're not chelaxian! We just LIKE to destroy incriminating evidence that proves we, I mean THEY, are moral-less slavers!!"

Feegle wrote:

Is there a limit on the number of players at a valid table? I have three friends who are interested in coming along on the 26th, with the possibility of one or two more to come, and I figure if that's likely to push Steel_Wind into two tables, I should give a heads-up with plenty of time to find another GM.

I'll get a pre-registration page up and we'll take stock later this week. I'll post the link here. Please note: I may decide to go with a custom webpage as I really am not a fan of Warhorn's design.

We should be okay with two tables on the 26th of July. The chances of that happening were anticipated and planned for... "just in case" :)

woohoo! count me in! (altho, I may be a tad late..)

Anatidae wrote:

HT North would be ideal for me. Were you even close to having enough people?

There were two willing people (including Jamie the manager); one more would have made it possible with the GM playing a pregen. A clump of people came later around 7:15ish.

Sigh.. I'm totally your "one more" next time!

Steel_Wind wrote:

The length of scenarios in terms of how they fit within the available time for in-store organized play on weeknights was the primary concern that lead to the 2 hour format in 4E's "D&D Encounters" series. Not everything WotC does is a bad idea folks -- and the 2 hour time slot for D&D Encounters attempted to address this concern.

Now, don't get me wrong. I am not saying that a 2 hour scenario is a better scenario that a 4 hour one. I am not saying that D&D Encounters adventures are better than Pathfinder Society Scenarios, either. Ok?

I AM saying that it might be helpful if Hyrum Savage and Mark Moreland should give some thought to offering some sort of 2 hour PFS slot of some kind, instead of a 4 hour...

Agreed. As I said, when I tried organising a game at HT North, we didn't get enough players early enough. By the time there was a quorum of interested players, it was after 7 and so we played D&D Encounters instead. :-)

HT North would be ideal for me. Were you even close to having enough people?

excuse my ignorance, (I'm a PFS nub) but.. is there no way we can split the module into two sessions?

Or is that against the rules?

How are you folks feeling about a regular Tuesday night PFS game at 401 Games? 6:00-10:00 p.m. would be the plan.

I live and work up north, but tuesday nights are awesome for me, so I'd definitely be interested in coming out, altho 6 may be hectic for me to try and get down to 401.

I run a home game of PFOS every month in Mississauga, mostly on Sunday afternoons from 12-5pm.

Most weeks I'm at capacity but one of the players is too busy, so I might be looking for someone to take his spot. If interested let me know.

One sunday a month doesn't sound too bad at all.. if you're looking for one more player, I'd love to try it out.

my email addy, if you want to get in touch with me, is

THANKS!

I vote following week!

sigh, damned business trips, I'm away all week that week. curses!

Hey Hogarth! Are you still running something? I'd love to give Pfs a try if possible.

Thanks!

not sure if this was covered earlier..

"...An alchemist adds his Intelligence modifier to damage done with splash weapons.."

does this include the splash damage done to adjacent squares (usually just 1) when an alchemist throws alchemist's fire?

what about the additional damage the following round to the "main target"?

Anatidae wrote:

I don't know if it's the nova-ability that's the issue here. The fact is that the guy's a summoner. That's what he does. I have no problems with him being able to summon at a whim, multiple times a day, as good or better then a wizard can. The issue revolves around resource use. If a wizard burns all his spells, he becomes no better then a speed bump the rest of the way. The summoner, on the other hand, picks up a weapon and uses his d8 average BAB and goes to town.

Both flavour *and* crunch seem to point to a class like the summoner having a d6/below average BAB.

Would it be ok if we could perhaps hear the reasoning behind giving the summoner d8s? Maybe that would help us understand the summoner's underlying role a little bit better?

When the Wizard runs out of spells he starts using his wand of Fireballs/Scorching Ray/etc. While the summoner can as well, it requires a UMD for him( those spells not being on the summoner's spell list ).

or he could whip out a wand of summon monster instead.. using an item to supplement a character's resource use affects all classes equally, and doesn't solve the underlying issue..

I don't know if it's the nova-ability that's the issue here. The fact is that the guy's a summoner. That's what he does. I have no problems with him being able to summon at a whim, multiple times a day, as good or better then a wizard can. The issue revolves around resource use. If a wizard burns all his spells, he becomes no better then a speed bump the rest of the way. The summoner, on the other hand, picks up a weapon and uses his d8 average BAB and goes to town.

Both flavour *and* crunch seem to point to a class like the summoner having a d6/below average BAB.

Would it be ok if we could perhaps hear the reasoning behind giving the summoner d8s? Maybe that would help us understand the summoner's underlying role a little bit better?