Sanctioning Adventure Paths for Pathfinder Society

Monday, December 10, 2012



Adventure Paths are the staple item here at Paizo. Since the inception of Pathfinder Society Organized Play, some people have wanted to play the Adventure Paths and receive credit for their Pathfinder Society characters. This is one of the few bullet-list items I have been trying to figure out since I arrived 15 months ago. The release of the Shattered Star Adventure Path and its close ties to the Pathfinder Society made it even more imperative that we find a way to include Adventure Paths in sanctioned Organized Play. We feel it's the right thing to do, both from a business perspective and as a way of making even more material available for event organizers and players who've gone through what we already produced and are chomping at the bit for more.

Over the past few months, we have dedicated a large percentage of our weekly Pathfinder Society meetings to make sure we have the best formula for as seamless a fit as possible in sanctioning Adventure Paths. We could not find an easy solution to allow play through an entire Adventure Path, or to easily port a character in and out of a specific volume of an Adventure Path. With the feedback of our Venture-Officers, we think we have a system that can appeal to the widest audience.

The solution we've landed on is treating one section of a Pathfinder Adventure Path volume like a module. It would generally be played over one to three sessions, and grant 3 XP, 4 PP, and a level-dependent amount of gp. An example you will find on the first Chronicle sheet is from the first installment of Rise of the Runelords, Burnt Offerings. When you play through areas C1 through E10 of Thistletop, your GM may assign you the Chronicle sheet for Burnt Offerings.

If possible, all players must use an existing Pathfinder Society character (without modification) within 1 level of the starting level of the sanctioned content from a Pathfinder Adventure Path. In the example used above for Burnt Offerings, you would use a 3rd-, 4th-, or 5th-level character.

For Adventure Path content below 9th level, if you do not have a character in the correct level range, you may use a Pathfinder Society pregenerated character or the Iconics found in the NPC Codex. If you play a 1st-level pregenerated character, you may apply the credit from that character to a newly created character of your very own, with the gp gained reduced to 1,398 gp (or 699 gp for slow advancement track characters). If you play a non-1st-level pregenerated character, you may apply the credit to your character as soon as she reaches the level of the pregenerated character played. Equipment listed on the pregenerated character sheet may only be sold to clear conditions, such as death, during the play of the module and any remaining wealth does not carry over at the end of the module.

Alternatively, if you are participating in a Pathfinder Adventure Path with an ongoing home group undertaking the entire campaign, you may receive credit for playing the sanctioned portions of the adventure as if you had played a pregenerated character. In this case, GMs running the Adventure Path are not bound to the rules of the Pathfinder Society Organized Play campaign when running the campaign or the sanctioned portion of the adventure. Pathfinder Society characters and characters from an ongoing Adventure Path campaign may not play in the same adventure.

If a character dies and is brought back to life, the GM must determine the rewards for that character. The minimum possible reward is 0 gp, 1 XP, and 1 PP on the medium advancement track or 0 gp, 1/2 XP, and 1/2 PP on the slow advancement track. If a character participates in more than two-thirds of the sanctioned content of an Adventure Path, she should receive the full rewards. GMs and active players are encouraged to hasten the return of any characters waiting to be raised from the dead.

Players who do not complete each game session earn 1/3 fewer gp, 1 fewer XP, and 1 fewer Prestige Point for each session missed. This also applies to players who join later sessions; they receive 1/3 fewer gp, 1 fewer XP, and 1 fewer Prestige Point for each session missed. In both cases, players earn a minimum of 1/3 gp, 1 XP, and 1 Prestige Point.

As always, each player may receive credit for each sanctioned Adventure Path volume once as a player and once as a GM, in either order. Players must accept Chronicle sheets for their characters the first time they play any sanctioned content. A player may replay a sanctioned Adventure Path at the GM’s discretion, but the player may not receive more than one Chronicle sheet per adventure. The only exception is Tier 1–2 sanctioned Adventure Path content. A player may only play a Tier 1–2 sanctioned Adventure Path for credit once with a 2nd-level character, but may use additional 1st-level characters to replay the same content for credit.

Since sanctioned Adventure Paths can be multi-session events, a Pathfinder Society character may not be used in other Pathfinder Society events until the character receives a Chronicle sheet for the Adventure Path volume. GMs are advised to work with players who miss the final session of the module or AP in order for those players to receive their Chronicle sheets.

The data entry system has already been updated to include all 10 of the current sanctioned Adventure Path volumes. Data is entered into our reporting system in the same manner as sanctioned modules. You receive credit toward GM stars the same as sanctioned modules.

The Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play, Version 4.3, scheduled for release next month, will update Chapter 6 with all info about sanctioned Adventure Paths and how they work within Pathfinder Society.

Initially, we are only sanctioning Rise of the Runelords Anniversary Edition and Shattered Star Adventure Paths. If those are well received, we will consider sanctioning other Adventure Paths in the future. You can find the rules for running these in Pathfinder Society Organized Play and the Chronicle sheets on their respective product pages.

We are excited with the solution that this not only expands normal Pathfinder Society play options, but also increases play opportunities past 12th level. We hope that this will also allow players who enjoy our Adventure Paths, but have not yet experienced Pathfinder Society, to give our organized play a try.

We understand there are a lot of very strong opinions among the player base about whether we should sanction Adventure Paths and how they should be implemented. We value your opinions and look forward to reading your thoughts about the exciting new play options we have introduced today. With your input, we can make Pathfinder Society better for all.

Mike Brock
Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Pathfinder Adventure Path Pathfinder Society
201 to 250 of 307 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>
5/5

Why not? If they play the sanctioned sections, they get the chronicles. You don't have to finish the whole thing.

Dark Archive 4/5

If they have already completed both books, then no, they would not be able to get retroactive credit for playing them.

Sovereign Court

Patrick Harris @ SD wrote:
Why not? If they play the sanctioned sections, they get the chronicles. You don't have to finish the whole thing.

It was this line in the blog post (emphasis mine) that prompted the question:

the blog wrote:
Alternatively, if you are participating in a Pathfinder Adventure Path with an ongoing home group undertaking the entire campaign, you may receive credit for playing the sanctioned portions of the adventure as if you had played a pregenerated character.

ETA: @Todd: They are still in book 1. I know there is no retroactive credit.

Dark Archive 4/5

If you have already played through the two volumes of the books, then no, they do not qualify for credit. The portion you highlighted is talking about starting the campaign and not using PFS rules.

Dark Archive 4/5

zylphryx wrote:
Patrick Harris @ SD wrote:
Why not? If they play the sanctioned sections, they get the chronicles. You don't have to finish the whole thing.

It was this line in the blog post (emphasis mine) that prompted the question:

the blog wrote:
Alternatively, if you are participating in a Pathfinder Adventure Path with an ongoing home group undertaking the entire campaign, you may receive credit for playing the sanctioned portions of the adventure as if you had played a pregenerated character.
ETA: @Todd: They are still in book 1. I know there is no retroactive credit.

Then there isn't a problem. If they are still in book one, they qualify.

Sovereign Court

Which, as was indicated in my original post, is what I am asking about.

1) I will be running books 1 and 2 as a home game, not PFS. After book 2 it goes into 100% homebrew.

2) They are still in book 1, they have not yet completed the Thistletop portion, so they are still viable for credit.

3) So the question, if I was not clear initially, is if I am running a home game, do I need to run the entire campaign in order to give out the chronicle sheets or can they be given if you run part of the AP as a portion of a home game (such as using Books 1 and 2 to start a campaign that then goes in a completely different direction)?

Technically, we are not undertaking the entire campaign, only a portion of it, hence my question ...

5/5

That's ... a fair question, if somewhat specific. Unless campaign leadership says otherwise, I would go ahead and assign the Chronicles. It's not like they retroactively become invalid if you decide not to keep playing after Book 2, so it doesn't seem logical to penalize you for making that decision in advance.

Sovereign Court

That's my thought as well (otherwise one would not be able to hand out chronicle sheets until 1-2 years after starting the undertaking) ... but with the wording I figured it would be best to verify.

ETA: This would also lead to the potential to throw other installments into a home campaign. If one were to incorporate, say, book 5 into a home game, would the chronicle sheet still be viable to distribute even though the players did not take part in books 1-4?

Grand Lodge 5/5

zylphryx wrote:
3) So the question, if I was not clear initially, is if I am running a home game, do I need to run the entire campaign in order to give out the chronicle sheets or can they be given if you run part of the AP as a portion of a home game (such as using Books 1 and 2 to start a campaign that then goes in a completely different direction)?

No, you do not need to run the entire AP. You can run whichever chapters of the AP you want, and you get the chronicle for the chapter you ran/played through.

zylphryx wrote:
ETA: This would also lead to the potential to throw other installments into a home campaign. If one were to incorporate, say, book 5 into a home game, would the chronicle sheet still be viable to distribute even though the players did not take part in books 1-4?

Yes, you can still get the chronicle for book 5 even if you didnt play through books 1-4.

Sovereign Court

Thanks Seth. That's what I thought but with the way it was worded it seemed like a good idea to get clarification.

4/5

I don't know if anyone else has reported Sanctioned AP play yet, but it's currently giving 1 table of credit instead of 2. If that's as intended, then all is well. I don't mind either way, as even any credit at all is a neat boon and more than I expected--just seemed weird for We Be Goblins to give 2 and an AP to give 1, so just making sure it isn't a glitch.

2/5

Rogue Eidolon wrote:
I don't know if anyone else has reported Sanctioned AP play yet, but it's currently giving 1 table of credit instead of 2. If that's as intended, then all is well. I don't mind either way, as even any credit at all is a neat boon and more than I expected--just seemed weird for We Be Goblins to give 2 and an AP to give 1, so just making sure it isn't a glitch.

Same thing with me. I haven't run any 3 XP modules before, so I don't know if this is normal.

The Exchange 4/5

normally 3 xp modules give 2 GM credit, but who knows if it's a glitch or not :D

Grand Lodge 4/5 Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator

GM credit for Sanctioned modules should now be fixed to award 2 GM star credits.

4/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Michael Brock wrote:
GM credit for Sanctioned modules should now be fixed to award 2 GM star credits.

It looks like it has--it lists me at 100 tables of credit now, and 4 stars. Thanks again Mike--you rock!

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

Congrats, RE.

4/5

I wonder if there is any chance if we could get the revised Pathfinder Society traits in the Shattered Star Players Guide opened up for PFS. Though I guess the removal of class requirements may make them a bit too powerful.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 ***** Contributor

Michael Brock wrote:
You apply Chronicles just like GM credit, when playing these with anything other than a PFS character.

As I am now contemplating running a group through RotRL in "Campaign Mode" myself, this one sentence from Mike makes 2000% more sense than this entire thread has about how to apply XP.

Thanks Mike!

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

An acquaintance of mine is very enthusiastic about 'Reign of Winter' and is hoping to start it soon with a group of friends. He was assuming that the chapters would be sanctioned on a monthly basis when they were reviewed to be added to the additional resources page, and that they'd get PFS credit for running through the campaign, but I wasn't so sure. Can anyone confirm what the intentions are regarding sanctioning new adventure paths?

Grand Lodge 4/5 Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator

1 person marked this as a favorite.

We aren't currently looking to sanction Reign of Winter. We are still watching and collecting feedback from the first two to determine if it is worth the time and resources to sanction further APs.

5/5

Is there a projected timeline on that? It strikes me as the kind of thing that will need several months before preliminary data can be evaluated.

5/5 *

I haven't yet read the Reign of Winter book, but I can see why not all APs would be sanctioned. Rise of the Runelords and Shattered Star have the advantage of having a concise set of dungeon(s) in each book, making selecting a sub-section of each chapter easy to sanction. Reign of Winter may be much harder logistically.

However, compare that to something like Kingmaker, which hardly has a dungeons per-se, and it's much more a myriad of smaller encounters. Kingmaker would be virtually impossible to run in "PFS-mode" when compared to ROTRL and S. Star.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

Michael Brock wrote:
We aren't currently looking to sanction Reign of Winter. We are still watching and collecting feedback from the first two to determine if it is worth the time and resources to sanction further APs.

Thanks for the quick response Mike; I'll pass the message on.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Michael Brock wrote:
We aren't currently looking to sanction Reign of Winter. We are still watching and collecting feedback from the first two to determine if it is worth the time and resources to sanction further APs.

I can tell you they will be worth for me, but not for another year when we run what has gotten chronicles for, now if you start putting out chronicles for legacy of fire you might get some reports from me sooner... ;)

Verdant Wheel 4/5

Michael Brock wrote:
We aren't currently looking to sanction Reign of Winter. We are still watching and collecting feedback from the first two to determine if it is worth the time and resources to sanction further APs.

I guess the problem with that approach is that only people who choose to GM the sanctioned parts now are counted. I am GMing the APs in order and already finished Rise of the Runelords before the sanction was possible and i have a long way to go before i reach Shattered Star. All my regular players are now into Pathfinder Society and would be cool if we could report these games.

Maybe if Paizo quit sanctioning APs, we could make a informal organization to organize APs advancement and rate achievments so people around the world can compare and compeat over AP completness. It would be cool :)
I already had an idea of forming a comite to make a Paizonian Ennies only for the forum of the best moments of Paizo year (best NPC, best encounter, best art, most overpowered feat etc...)

Verdant Wheel 4/5

Hebert Ricardo Magno wrote:


I guess the problem with that approach is that only people who choose to GM the sanctioned parts now are counted. I am GMing the APs in order and already finished Rise of the Runelords before the sanction was possible and i have a long way to go before i reach Shattered Star. All my regular players are now into Pathfinder Society and would be cool if we could report these games.
Maybe if Paizo quit sanctioning APs, we could make a informal organization to organize APs advancement and rate achievments so people around the world can compare and compeat over AP completness. It would be cool :)
I already had an idea of forming a comite to make a Paizonian Ennies only for the forum of the best moments of Paizo year (best NPC, best encounter, best art, most overpowered feat etc...)

My post above was very bad written. What i meaned is that if turned out that sanctioning APs wasn't a good move for Paizo, that we as fans could manage an informal way of rewarding AP play and definetelly not that Paizo is doing a bad job at that. I am a bit dislexic and sometimes even in portuguese i put my foot in my mouth.

Silver Crusade 5/5

I am diligently working on running RotRL in it's entirety in a home game for my players.

Dataphiles 4/5 5/55/55/55/5

My home game is running RotRL and I can tell you the the PFS players love the idea of getting credit for it.

We are running in "Campaign Mode" so it will take time to finish as we are still in book one 9 sessions deep so far.

2/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Society Subscriber

OK, so to confirm for the mildly confounded...

#1-I am currently running RotRL as a home game with standard PFRPG characters. After the players finish Thistletop I can give them (and myself) a Chronicle Sheet for "Burnt Offerings" that may be applied to any 3rd through 5th level PFS character in their inventory.

#2-Then after they finish Foxglove Manor I can give out "The Skinsaw Murders" Chronicle Sheet. It can be applied to any 4th to 6th level PFS character. It does not have to be applied to the same one that received the "Burnt Offerings" sheet.

#3-In either case, the Society characters that get the Chronicle Sheets for sanctioned Adventure Path content can still be played normally in Society scenarios and sanctioned modules. Or other sanctioned Adventure Paths for that matter.

Are these assumptions correct?

Grand Lodge 4/5

Looks right.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

You can also assign the chronicle to a PC of a lower level than stated in the tier on the sheet; the credit is then held until the PFS PC reaches the lowest level of the AP chapter's tier, then applied immediately.

For example, you can assign the sheet for 'Burnt Offerings' to a 1st or 2nd level PC; this chronicle is held for credit, then applied as soon as the PFS PC reaches 3rd level, immediately bumping them up to 4th level (unless they're on the slow track).

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

A related question: the chronicle for 'Fortress of the Stone Giants' is legal for level 12-14 PCs. By the time my home group completes this chapter, our highest level PFS characters will probably be 11th level or lower, or at best exactly 12th level (and waiting to play the Eyes of the Ten arc).

If we assign the chronicle for 'Fortress of the Stone Giants' to our highest level character, under normal rules, they will blow straight past 12th level upon reaching it, and not be eligible to play 'Eyes of the Ten'. Other than assigning the chronicle to a different (lower level) character (that may well never reach 12th level), is there a workaround/exception for this, e.g. to apply it immediately after 'Eyes of the Ten'?

Grand Lodge 4/5

The only workaround I can think of is to have already started the Eyes of the Ten arc before you get the chronicle. Once they have started the arc, they are locked in until the arc is completed...

5/5 *

Paz wrote:
If we assign the chronicle for 'Fortress of the Stone Giants' to our highest level character, under normal rules, they will blow straight past 12th level upon reaching it, and not be eligible to play 'Eyes of the Ten'. Other than assigning the chronicle to a different (lower level) character (that may well never reach 12th level), is there a workaround/exception for this, e.g. to apply it immediately after 'Eyes of the Ten'?

You could hold out reporting the event until after you play EOTT.

Shadow Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I miss getting credit for home campaigns because I play PFS very rarely. When I do I am basically forced to play a pre-gen or a level 1 character. I want to be able to play the ideas I have not wait years to have then level to the point they are doing what I want them to do. I play with my friends and often want to play with the characters I have (and know how to use) that existed in those other campaigns. My suggestion is simple, why not just let a single AP volume count at the rate of GM credit if it is played through? I'm not sure there need to be special rewards other than getting credit as if it was a module. Just have it grant a flat amount of Gold and Prestige (less than max but not severely nerfed) on some table somewhere for this is what a character using these types of credits has available? Just give credit the way GMs receive credit (once again, maybe at a slightly reduced rate) so that people like me who more often play in home games can also play society at conventions. It would fix my biggest complaint about society which is it is to intrinsically self centered; If I am not playing society all the time, I am left out when I try to get in a couple of games at conventions with new people.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

Christopher: Am I correct in thinking you're located in the Seattle area? If someone who lives near the home of Paizo and PaizoCon can't get their PFS fix, what hope is there for the rest of us?! ;-)

First of all, can I check that you're aware that if you're playing in a Rise of the Runelords or Shattered Star home campaign, the players can get the same PFS benefits as the GM - namely a chronicle sheet for each of the six chapters to apply to their PFS PC? This is applied just like GM credit, so is a bit of a bonus in terms of levelling up a character that's already 3rd level, say.

If you're having problems making it that far, bear in mind that there's nothing stopping home groups running PFS scenarios and reporting them for credit, just like a con game. It only takes three of these to get your PC up to 2nd level, or six to get to 3rd.

If you're being left out of games at cons, then you might want to make your local venture-captain aware, as that goes against the spirit of encouraging new players into the PFS campaign. Even so, if you've managed to get a couple of games in, you can't be far off levelling up.

I don't think you'll ever see a situation where you can create a higher level character for no effort, as it devalues the effort of the thousands of players that have put the time into building up their PFS PCs from scratch.

Dark Archive RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32

Hmm... looks like Christopher is in the Tacoma area... I know we've got games in Olympia (bit too far south for you probably) and looks like the next closest regular games are in U-District (same distance the other direction) - however, that's just off the top of my head. Chris, you should hop onto our local boards (NWPFS.org) for more PFS games in our region, or feel free to PM me directly and I'll hook you up ^_^

Silver Crusade 2/5 RPG Superstar 2014 Top 16

With the fairly recent release of detailed information about Pathfinder #71: Rasputin Must Die! I would like to formally request... no, BEG that the Reign of Winter AP be the next to be sanctioned. It would be SO AMAZING to play in WWI Russia at a PFS-sanctioned event with a high-level character!

Liberty's Edge 3/5

Christopher, come to Redmond, join the hive minnnnnd...

(Isn't Redmond easier to get to from Tacoma than the U-District, anyway?)

Shadow Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Its not just that, We have a group of like minded individuals who really enjoy playing APs together. My major gripe is that when I go to a con to play with new people, I have to create a new character or play a pre-gen. My group is unfortunately not interested in the short PFS scenarios and are quite voracious when it comes to gaming. I am hoping they will extend at least to the other APs a simple conversion so that when I go to a convention I can play a character I want to play, not a new level 1 character I will never be able to level or another iteration of the same pre-gen.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

Christopher Van Horn wrote:
My major gripe is that when I go to a con to play with new people, I have to create a new character or play a pre-gen.

Once. Then the next time, you play that character again. And then once more, and you level him up.

If you go to a multi-day con and start a new character, you've got a good chance of having a 2nd-level PC (at least) by the end of the event.

Grand Lodge 4/5

You might see if your home group would be interested in playing any of the sanctioned Pathfinder modules. They are usually good for putting in levels on PCs.

Run through a few modules, and you can add in the credits from SS or RotRL, and you can get to fairly high level with out using PFS scenarios.

Scarab Sages 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Michael Brock wrote:
We aren't currently looking to sanction Reign of Winter. We are still watching and collecting feedback from the first two to determine if it is worth the time and resources to sanction further APs.

From what I hear you guys aren't getting great numbers from the current sanctioned APs and that's why things aren't looking good for more sanctions in the future. One of the problems though is that Shattered Star wasn't sanctioned until it was nearly done. Those people who played it as it came out probably haven't gone back and reported it and there hasn't been enough time since the sanctioning announcement for very many games to start up and get to a point where they are reporting significantly.

My advice would be to sanction Reign of Winter as it is coming out. Lots of groups will be playing it as it is coming out and they will be more likely to report it then as they are playing it for the first time through. If it's not sanctioned until a year later, those groups will be done and will have moved on and won't care enough to go back and report it. That's what's likely happening with Shattered Star right now. And it will take some time for people to go back and play enough SS and RotR to get significant reporting.

So I will just close by saying that I think it was great idea to start sanctioning APs and that I don't think bad numbers in the beginning should keep you guys from sanctioning more. Sanction Reign of Winter (and maybe the next AP) as it comes out and see if your numbers are better. If they are, then great. If not, then you can decide not to waste your time with it. You haven't given it enough of a chance yet.

Scarab Sages 4/5

Just as an aside (and the higher ups may be interested to hear it):

I would like to GM Reigns of Winter in a couple months when I have a break from school. First of all, I would be much more motivated to run through it if it were PFS-sanctioned already. And secondly, if I run through it this summer and it's not sanctioned for another year, I probably wouldn't bother reporting it a year after I played it. If you're going to sanction it, it needs to be right away. But that's just my advice.

Thanks and either way I appreciate that you guys are always willing to try new things to expand the campaign and I love everything that you are doing with PFS.

5/5

That's actually a really good idea. I suspect many play them as they come out, so that could be a good way to get numbers quickly.

Scarab Sages 4/5

Patrick Harris @ SD wrote:
That's actually a really good idea. I suspect many play them as they come out, so that could be a good way to get numbers quickly.

Exactly. I think sanctioning RotR and SS was a great idea but I think the timing was just poor because it didn't happen until SS was almost over and everyone was finishing playing it. And that's why the numbers are low. But if Reign of Winter was sanctioned now as it is released, I bet the AP reporting numbers would start to be a lot more significant.

5/5

Or, you know, if they allowed retroactive reporting ... ;)

Scarab Sages 4/5

Patrick Harris @ SD wrote:
Or, you know, if they allowed retroactive reporting ... ;)

Well, yeah, that's another thing. I understand not allowing retroactive reporting and I can stand behind that decision. That's why I'm pushing to get Reign of Winter sanctioned as it's coming out. It's no wonder the numbers are pitiful if you sanction things after the fact.

Dark Archive 4/5 **** Venture-Agent, Indiana—Bloomington

I'll just say this concerning Shattered Star and sanctioning it. Many of the people in my area and PFS group have very strong opinions about it. Many dislike the concept of Shattered Star as an adventure pack because they already play PFS and because the whole adventure path is just one giant PFS adventure, they were less inclined to want to play it.

Now, if you actually sanction Reign of Winter now, as it is coming out, I'm sure that tons of people will want to play it as a home game and then get credit for their PFS characters. That is because it is a different style of RP from being in the Pathfinder Society, as PFS play enforces. People like the variation, and would play any other sanctioned adventure paths while still having a PFS night.

So, I strongly encourage you to start sanctioning Reign of Winter and any further adventure paths as they come out, since you'll get better numbers on reporting that way. Also, future ones, not being set in the Pathfinder Society, will probably be better received for their contrast from PFS style.

Please, please, please sanction Reign of Winter.

5/5

morbon wrote:
I'll just say this concerning Shattered Star and sanctioning it. Many of the people in my area and PFS group have very strong opinions about it. Many dislike the concept of Shattered Star as an adventure pack because they already play PFS and because the whole adventure path is just one giant PFS adventure, they were less inclined to want to play it.

Took me a minute to understand what you meant but that makes a lot of sense. If you're going to have an epic-tale home game you don't want it to just be more of the same. A very good point, that.

51 to 100 of 307 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Paizo Blog: Sanctioning Adventure Paths for Pathfinder Society All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.