This would be my first time filling out a SFS chronicle, so let me know right away if I screwed anything up! I only filled out the totals for the bottom 'Reputation' section if this was your first scenario, which is the case for almost all of you. I otherwise wouldn't know what your current faction reputation totals are, and it's up to the player to fill those out or give them to me prior to me writing the sheet up so I can fill them out for you!
Male Shirren | SP 14/14 HP 12/12 | RP 4/4 | EAC 14; KAC 15 | Fort+1; Ref +4; Will +4 | Init: +1 | Perc: +5
I haven't updated Ehdd yet, I may make some minor tweaks here and there and make an attempt at buying some new stuff, but I'll get involved as is for now.
Male Shirren | SP 14/14 HP 12/12 | RP 4/4 | EAC 14; KAC 15 | Fort+1; Ref +4; Will +4 | Init: +1 | Perc: +5
Ok I think I'm set, made a few changes, added in the boons I could find I had, upgraded my armor, got my first augmentation, pistol extra battery, a comm unit!
Changed out the feat (I'm really waffling on feats, so few choices), dropped intimidate.
N Android Solarian 3 | SP 14/14; HP 18/18 | RP 2/2 | Jump-jet 7/10 | Attuned: Graviton 3 | EAC 16; KAC 17 (+4 vs AoO from movement)| Fort +3; Ref +3; Will +3 (+2 vs disease, mind-affecting, poison & sleep) | Init: +2 | Perc: +5
Rebuild done! I am now a Solarian.
GM, I accepted the subdermal graft, see this post. I also have one chronicle prior to this one (quests), so my wayfinder reputation line should be 2|4. Can you adjust my chronicle? Thanks!
N Android Solarian 3 | SP 14/14; HP 18/18 | RP 2/2 | Jump-jet 7/10 | Attuned: Graviton 3 | EAC 16; KAC 17 (+4 vs AoO from movement)| Fort +3; Ref +3; Will +3 (+2 vs disease, mind-affecting, poison & sleep) | Init: +2 | Perc: +5
Thanks GM!
Can I ask another favor? I see I can not use the Spellgem Cache from my Welcome to Starfinder Boon, since I am not a spellcaster anymore. Would you be kind enough to change it to the tattoo?
Male CG damaya lashunta priest mystic (overlord) 4 | SP 24/24 HP 27/28 | RP 5/7 | EAC 15; KAC 15 | Fort +1; Ref +1; Will +9 | Init: +0 | Perc: +12, SM: +10 | Speed 30 fly 30| Healing Touch 1/1 | Detect Thoughts 1/1 | Spells: 1st 1/5; 2nd 0/3 | Active conditions: nil
Sorry, Paizo site has not been kind to me the last few days. Only just managed to get in but I really need to get to bed now. Will try to update in approximately 12 hours but please bot me where necessary.
Male CG damaya lashunta priest mystic (overlord) 4 | SP 24/24 HP 27/28 | RP 5/7 | EAC 15; KAC 15 | Fort +1; Ref +1; Will +9 | Init: +0 | Perc: +12, SM: +10 | Speed 30 fly 30| Healing Touch 1/1 | Detect Thoughts 1/1 | Spells: 1st 1/5; 2nd 0/3 | Active conditions: nil
Whew, things seem to be working now and it hasn't reached my turn.
For my learning since I haven't played an operative, I noticed that even though Fareon's attack missed, he still did the damage from the trick attack. Just want to clarify that? I had always assumed that if the attack missed, even if the trick attack succeeded, there would be no damage cos I've pictured it as that the trick allows the operative to make a more devastating attack.
Male Korasha Lashunta Icon Operative (Daredevil) 9 SP 72/72 HP 58/58 RP 10/10 | KAC 29 EAC 28 | Saves F+7 R+12 W+7 | Initiative +9; Perception +14 | Resistance Cold 5, Fire 5 | Status: N/A
Yeah, I was a bit unsure of that too, though I certainly wasn't going to dispute it! ;)
I had assumed it worked like sneak attack in Pathfinder, where it's additional damage on top of a successful attack. Here's the relevant text, with the parts that I think justify the way Red played it italicized:
Trick Attack wrote:
Just before making your attack, attempt a Bluff, Intimidate, or Stealth check (or a check associated with your specialization; see page 94) with a DC equal to 20 + your target’s CR. If you succeed at the check, you deal 1d4 additional damage and the target is flat-footed.
So it looks like the Trick Attack damage is applied as long as you succeed at the check, and you can then make your regular attack roll for normal damage.
I spent a good ten or fifteen minutes trying to find the answer to that question before I updated yesterday, but given the freshness of Starfinder, I found nothing substantial. So I went with GM fiat, and decided to read it as written, which says if you succeed at the check but doesn't necessarily state that you have to succeed at the attack roll. I have a feeling this rule will be up to interpretation until Paizo FAQs it.
Yeah, this battle has taken some time, partly because we're low levelled and learning and partly because the site has been down a lot. Bear with me... We should be done within another round or two!
