Looking to play in a pathfinder group. Have Skype or will use Roll20.net ((which I recommend))or some other system- GM's choice, of course.
My current 'go-to' character is the Expanded Spell-less Ranger published by the Kobold Press.
Just for clarification, I'm not into 'play by post' or anything else short of a weekly gaming session. Will be checking back here daily for updates.
I am setting up a Pathfinder VoIP game, using Mumble and D20pro, starting in January.
If you're interested, feel free to take a look at the thread I posted: http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2qfgb?Sunday-Mumble-Game
:/ Never used Mumble before. Although, I guess I had to assume I'd run into it, looking for an online game group. Although, I have pretty much 0 experience with the point buy system. I'll have to look it up to get a better handle on it.
"No 3rd party sources".
Does this include the Kobold Quarterly? There's a Class which I'd like to play [the Expanded Spell-less Ranger]. I can't stand the fact that the core Ranger can cast magic. It's just not natural for a character that's supposed to be focusing on their own skill and wit to survive.
Yes, that would include the Quarterly. Iirc, there are magic-less ranger archetypes available, if that's the kind of thing you want to play.
While I'm not exactly a fan of the Trapper, the Skirmisher archetype from the APG sounds like the kind of thing you're talking about wanting to play.
I've looked at the archetypes and they still don't feel right. All they do is rip away spells and substitute with a new Skill, or some other useless equivalent. The Expanded Spell-less Ranger is a complete retake on the class which adequately covers up for the lack of spells with something called 'Ranger Talents'. Spell-less Archetypes just don't cover it for me. Paizo made a wrong move when they gave the Ranger spells to begin with (imho)...
:/ Thanks anyway though.
|
In truth, Paizo was not the first to give Rangers spells - I think that's a holdout from before.
I'm actually inclined to agree with you that rangers don't need magic, but messing with 3rd party sources opens a can of worms that I'm just not comfortable with.
Sorry about that, man. Better luck with the next one.
Found another player that's interested.
Still looking for at least 3 other players and we still do need a DM, if anybody is interested in the position?
|
Hi, Ulrich.
I've DMed online Pathfinder games before using Skype and D20Pro (for which I have extra guest licenses so player's don't have to buy them).
What kind of PF game are you interested in? Playing through one of the Adventure Paths? Shorter modules?
I'm located in the US Central time zone. Although weekly weeknight sessions would work for me, I'd prefer playing on Sundays. My local group usually plays on Saturdays.
Yorgi
Looks like we've got a DM and a few players (3)lined up then, cool. Myself and the other player are also located in the central time zone.
Very interested in playing :) Although I've never even glimpsed at the D20Pro system. I'll have to check it out.
I know I'm good for Sunday! I'll have to check with my friend though (the other player) to see if Sundays good for him. Hope so. I think we were looking for something more long term, whole adventures/campaigns, etc.
Yorgi + Koffing, look me up. My Gmail is WolfRuler34. Maybe one of us ought to look into starting a Facebook group where we an all communicate on a regular basis?
Just heard back from the other player.
He said that Sundays work for him too.
From here on out, I'll just be checking my Gmail for your guys' responses.
Just heard back from the other player.
He said that Sundays work for him too.
From here on out, I'll just be checking my Gmail for your guys' responses.
Uh. Slight mistype on my part. Gmail is wolfruler34. Whoops. No caps in there. Sorry for any confusion or lost emails it may have caused.