|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Creating a really obvious item that's been done dozens of times before... and then adding one boring completely unrelated ability to it... does not a superstar make.
Luckily, the other item is pretty cool, if hampered by have a really low save DC. But I guess magic items are supposed to have crappy DCs anyway, so WAD...
Haha! An ale mug item that does not reference Cayden Cailean, dwarves, OR frat parties! And in fact has very different imagery and mechanics that any ale mug item I've seen before. You get an automatic upvote just for that.
Of course, your opponent has no price, cost, aura, slot, weight, requirements, formatting, or paragraph breaks...
Item A, you could have been fully described in two sentences. Instead, your designer decided to spend three paragraphs describing in eye-gouging details the functioning of mechanics I already know. If your item causes the panicked condition (random example), you do not need to tell me that people affected by the item flee in terror and cower if cornered and drop everything they are carrying. That is what the panicked condition does.
Item B... You almost exactly duplicate an item that already exists... you are an extremely obvious item that does exactly the things anyone designing that item would make it do... and you are a SAK.
Meh, item B has better formatting.
Plot item! And... not even a subtle plot item... like... item has no use except in relation to plot, because it offers no mechanical benefits at all... >.>
And up against it... oh. Oh wow. I wish this item were matched up against a better item, so that I felt like the upvote were more meaningful. Congratulations, Mystery Designer, my next skald is going to be a swordsman...
Unless that is being too narrow in the definition of "descriptor". Paizo uses the same words to mean different things a lot of times.
Lots of monsters have abilities that contain the phrase "This is a mind-affecting fear effect" but are not spells. It seems to me that is an effect with a fear descriptor and would shut down psychics.
Which probably means that Intimidate works too...?
Haha, eating your way through a door. That is a really clever use of the spell.
Yeah, it works on anything that isn't magical (or has "exceptional qualities", which is GM fiat territory, but probably no eating adamantine, at least).
If you are worried about balance, it would be entirely reasonable to put a limit on how many pounds of food someone can eat without incapacitating themselves. :)
I ran a game via MapTool once, and the PC with low-light vision saved the party's bacon several times, since with a sunrod he could spot monsters 120' feet out. Meanwhile, the PC with darkvision kept missing concealment rolls due to dim light.
Other than that, I've never really seen low-light vision come into play much.
A) StFrancisss, you win this thread.
B) My interpretation of the jumping rules in this situation (this argument did come up at a table) is this: The DC to cross the pit is 10. HOWEVER, you need to spend 15 feet of movement doing so. If you don't have the extra five feet of (non-jumping) movement to legally move into the next square after your jump, then you fall.
Yes, this is unrealistic.
I see the assumption that all negative conditions should be easily removable at the level you are expected to suffer them as a flaw.
While I don't want to ruin people's fun by taking them out of participation entirely, I also feel that Pathfinder has a lack of lasting consequences compared to other systems I have played.
Adam Daigle wrote:
I'd greatly love to read a campaign journal from a GM that ran both concurrently, every other week switching off, and then pitted each group against themselves at the end.
I will try to keep a journal then, because that is almost exactly what I am going to do. :)
A friend and I will actually be running both at the same time - he will run Hell's Vengeance one day of the week, I will run Hell's Rebels another day.
I am so, so excited about this AP. I was going to skip Hell's Rebels. Now, instead, myself and a friend are going to wait until both APs are out and then run both at the same time, possibly with largely the same players in each (except he will be playing in one and I will be playing in the other, of course).
I am quite interested to see how Hell's Vengeance compares to Way of the Wicked, which I consider not just the best evil AP ever but straight up one of the best APs of all time period.
But this is Paizo we are talking about. It will of course be great. :)
EDIT: And for people who think a fun evil AP isn't possible, seriously, check out Way of the Wicked. I didn't think it was possible either, but that AP completely sold me. I ran the entire thing and it was the most fun my players and I have had with any AP except Kingmaker.
So I have said a couple times now that I was much more excited about Hell's Rebels when I thought it was an evil campaign. I was all ready to skip it entirely since traditional good vs evil APs aren't really my thing.
Drat it, Paizo, shut up and take my money! :p A good campaign that ties into an evil campaign immediately following it is just too cool. T_T
For what it is worth, my gaming group has decided to ban full casters from the setting entirely. There was an in-setting event to explain why (My Golarion really doesn't look like the normal Golarion anymore, I might have to do a "setting writeup" for it at some point), but wizards, clerics, druids, etc. simply don't exist anymore. Or those that do are effectively NPC classes - a cleric now gets partial caster progression but no new class features to make up for it, for example.
So far it has significantly improved our high level play experience.
Making it require 10 feet of movement makes it completely useless, since that means you are trading out weapon training, an ability that gives extra accuracy and damage to all attacks, for an ability that only gives accuracy and damage to single attacks.
Katana and wakizashi proficiency are not worth the loss of heavy armor and shields for the typical fighter - I would say the skills make up for that.
Initiative bonus is typically superior to bravery, but not by much. And bravery is a weak class feature on a weak class. You are not going to be breaking any games with an ability that takes until level 10 to equal the strength of a single feat.
I would say Bob Bob Bob is right - the only real balance issue is that it should give up all of weapon training.
Sure. We'll even assume that you are NOT controlling the mount as a free action.
Mounts in Combat wrote:
So, I am mounted on a non-combat trained horse. I successfully make a DC 20 Ride check as a move action to control my mount. I then direct my mount to take a double move. I then make a DC 20 Ride check to fast dismount as a free action. Finally, I take my standard action (the one I can perform "after the move action" as the rules explicitly say) to move up to my speed.
Now, I will be the first to say that this is completely silly from a physics perspective and shouldn't work. But RAW, I think it does.
Here's a fun wrinkle.
The rules explicitly say that one thing you CAN do after your mount has double moved is make a single melee attack. That means that after a mounted double move, you still have a standard action left.
So what stops me from having my mount double-move, free dismount, and then use my standard action to move?
Firstly, I'm pretty sure Savage Technologist has a really bad typo. The class says "When a barbarian ability would increase the savage technologist's Strength while raging, it increases her Dexterity instead."
I am 90% sure this is supposed to say "When a barbarian ability would increase the savage technologist's Constitution while raging, it increases her Dexterity instead." Emphasis mine.
However, even if you apply that fix, the modified rage says "when a barbarian ability" - a feat is not a barbarian ability.
So RAW, if your normal rage was +4 STR, +4 DEX, then Amplified Rage would end up giving you +8 STR, +4 CON, +4 DEX. However, house-ruling it to apply to Dex instead seems reasonable to me.
I was much more excited about Hell's Rebels when I thought it was an evil AP.
Reading the description, however, I see that is not the case, and as I am fairly burnt out on traditional good vs evil campaigns I think this will be another AP (counting Giantslayer) that I will be skipping. :(
Some other releases look very exciting, however - Occult Bestiary FTW. Also Distant Shores. SO excited for Distant Shores.
I ended up making Illaris a red herring. My PCs had already been betrayed by a Technic League agent (posing as a PC, no less) in the first book, and I wanted to keep that fresh in their mind. And send them on a merry little chase.
So they found out that there was a Technic League spy in town... and then they found a lot of evidence that Illaris was a spy.
Lucky for them, they confronted her themselves instead of turning her in to the town, and were able to find out that she is a spy... for New Thassilon*, not the Technic League. And she was able to lead them to evidence that the agent who had already betrayed them was the spy they were looking for. They are now eagerly seeking their revenge, and Illaris has joined as a cohort (and something of a romantic fling for one of the PCs).
*My players and I have a rule that all APs we run are canon in all future APs, no matter how things turn out. Kingmaker and (especially) Shattered Star had some... unconventional... endings, so the Golarion I am running this AP in looks fairly different from the standard.
I would go with a two-bladed sword modified into a two-bladed axe. Keep the damage the same, but change the critical from 19-20, which is usually a "sword" crit range, to x3, which is the standard "axe" crit range.
EDIT: Also, that picture does show the weapon being two-bladed; if you look at the bottom near Ajani's feet you can see the second blade.
I don't think Kasatha ARE known, actually.
In book six there's a note about Isuma not wanting to kill the crazy kasatha because she might be the only other living kasatha on Golarion.
That doesn't sound like a "novelty race" to me, otherwise you'd think she would have heard of other kasatha in Starfall.
My take on the "why is the final battle not in space" thing: I had the same reaction. Except my reaction was "why is the final BOOK not in space?!"
So here is what I figure. Unity has a worshiper capable of casting Miracle once a day. And an army of robots, including several working excavators. And thousands of years.
When my PCs make it to book six, Unity will be making final preparations to relaunch the Divinity. And it will happen while they are exploring it. :)
For my part, I turned Hellion into a multi-part boss battle, JRPG style, which I feel is very appropriate for giant robot battles.
I.e. each leg has this much HP/hardness, body has this much, claws, etc. And then the whole thing acts as one creature but each functional part gets to participate in a full attack routine.
It went pretty well - my PCs were pretty surprised to find out that they needed to make called shots, but quickly adapted to it and found a good strategy to bring him down. I had the main body be extremely durable, so they disabled his limbs until he had to expose his reactor core for a big attack, and then the party slayer jumped up onto his back and stabbed him in the core until he exploded.
Pretty epic, and the look on their faces when I said "and then he explodes" while the slayer was still standing on his back was priceless. :)
I'm pretty sure that while the fighter might have a hard-to-impossible time killing the wizard, the wizard CANNOT kill a mythic fighter.
Because Undetectable, RAW, is such a completely bull!@#$ broken ability that it makes Sacred Geometry look as intimidating as Elephant Stomp.
Here is the wording of Undetectable:
"This grants its bonded user the ability to become utterly undetectable while invisible. While invisible and in physical contact with this item, the bonded creature can't be detected or scryed by any method."
Emphasis mine. So let's talk about this for a moment.
You have a contingency that triggers whenever someone attacks you, and plane shifts you to your demiplane. Fair enough. The contingency doesn't trigger. Why? Because the fighter "cannot be detected[...]by any method". The contingency does not detect someone attacking you, and does not trigger.
You ask questions of the gods to get some idea of where the fighter is. This fails. Why? Because the fighter "cannot be detected[...]by any method". THE GODS do not know where he is. They can't tell you. No divination can tell you, in fact. No ANYTHING can tell you.
Throwing flour at the fighter fails to detect him. How? No idea, but RAW, no method can succeed in detecting the fighter. He lays his hand on you. You don't notice he's there. He sticks his sword into your chest. You don't notice he's there (by now he's use Divine Source for greater invisibility, so he doesn't lose it for attacking you). You try to walk through him and run into him, causing you to stumble and fall. You. Don't. Notice. That. He's. There.
If you ask me, Undetectable definitely deserves a place next to Sacred Geometry and Blood Money on the altar of "this destroys games".
Anzyr, can I get your agreement on this? I'm certainly with you on the level of breaking the game Wizards are capable of, but this particular Mythic power boggled my mind when I read it. Certainly I don't think it allows the fighter to kill the wizard (clones, clones, clones...at the very least), but I'm not sure I can think of a way the wizard can kill the fighter.