Why is investigator its own class?


Investigator Playtest


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Why does it take an entire class to build a character who is good at solving mysteries or tracking someone down? And why does it need to be done in exactly this way, instead of being a dedication feat line that any character can take? why can't someone who casts spells be a good investigator, or a cleric of Abadar be excellent at tracking down the con-man plying his trade in the markets? This would provide far more player options as a dedication than as it's own class.


This is a class that specializes in solving mysteries and tracking people down. It needs to be done as a class to fulfill the design goal of studying somebody in combat. Casters can be good investigators; either by their own means or eventually by taking the Investigator multiclass archetype.


Pathfinder LO Special Edition, Maps, Pathfinder Accessories, PF Special Edition Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Starfinder Superscriber

There will be an investigator dedication archetype in the final product.


I'm playing a Rogue multiclassed into Alchemist, and the Investigator seems like just a weakened version of my character.


Innominat wrote:
I'm playing a Rogue multiclassed into Alchemist, and the Investigator seems like just a weakened version of my character.

Considering many investigators will have nothing to do with alchemy, I don't really see how that's the case.

Community / Forums / Archive / Pathfinder / Playtests & Prerelease Discussions / Advanced Player’s Guide Playtest / Investigator Playtest / Why is investigator its own class? All Messageboards
Recent threads in Investigator Playtest