
MrJiNx-X_x |
Basically what it says on the tin.
I really want a focussed shapeshifting class, I know other classes have flavours of it, but nothing 100%.
I'm imagining the 'shifts' for certain abilities (such as growing claws/pseudopods or turning into a swarm) functioning as stances, with the addition of other monster abilities like the earth elementals reaction of collapsing into the earth.
Like the Shifter in 1e combined with the non-animal companion Hunter but with more.
You can have different origins too; blood, cursed, alchemical, freak accident, divine.
I just think there's too much in the idea to have it relegated to a subfeature of different other classes is all

Nyerkh |

Most of the 40 classes of 1E will show up at some point, one way or another. Some may not be actual full classes, some are likely to be fused, but we'll get them.
Shifter is not one of the four for next year.
But I'd expect it'll appear down the line. Probably not in the second or even third batch though.

BellyBeard |

Most of the 40 classes of 1E will show up at some point, one way or another. Some may not be actual full classes, some are likely to be fused, but we'll get them.
Shifter is not one of the four for next year.
But I'd expect it'll appear down the line. Probably not in the second or even third batch though.
Sorry for the tangent, but do we know all 4 classes in the APG? I know of witch but not the others.

WatersLethe |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Nyerkh wrote:Sorry for the tangent, but do we know all 4 classes in the APG? I know of witch but not the others.Most of the 40 classes of 1E will show up at some point, one way or another. Some may not be actual full classes, some are likely to be fused, but we'll get them.
Shifter is not one of the four for next year.
But I'd expect it'll appear down the line. Probably not in the second or even third batch though.
Witch, Swashbuckler, Oracle, Investigator iirc

Vidmaster7 |

The animal instinct barbarin is already most of the way there, relying solely on shape shifted unarmed attacks and natural armor, plus eventually turning into animals full stop. If you multiclass to pick up focus spells you can probably spend every class feat on something shape shifting related.
So basically just need an archtype to replace spell casting with a bit more combat effectiveness and we are their. However if it was it's own class it would be easier to make the niche shape shifters.

Ramanujan |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
For what it is worth, for me PF1 struggled to provide this even given ten years. It was was generally the one class I most wanted - and spent most time looking for.
Synthesist was possibly the best in terms of catering to options from level one, even though it had spell casting. Some of the archetypes were ok, but most were very disappointing, and none were amazing/exactly what I was looking for - even if given a lot of rope.
Edit: Actually Oozemancer was hilarious and as a result qualified as amazing in my book.

Vidmaster7 |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

For what it is worth, for me PF1 struggled to provide this even given ten years.
Synthesist was possibly the best in terms of catering to options from level one, even though it had spell casting. Some of the archetypes were ok, but most were very disappointing, and none were amazing/exactly what I was looking for - even if given a lot of rope.
Edit: Actually Oozemancer was hilarious and as a result qualified as amazing in my book.
I loved the concept for it but it was borderline unplayable at low level.

Ramanujan |
Ramanujan wrote:I loved the concept for it but it was borderline unplayable at low level.For what it is worth, for me PF1 struggled to provide this even given ten years.
Synthesist was possibly the best in terms of catering to options from level one, even though it had spell casting. Some of the archetypes were ok, but most were very disappointing, and none were amazing/exactly what I was looking for - even if given a lot of rope.
Edit: Actually Oozemancer was hilarious and as a result qualified as amazing in my book.
Oh, definitely. Better to use in a campaign not starting at level one.
The stupidity at level one did contribute to the hilarity, but in a way that wasn’t productive in practice.