Warner Brothers and Amazon developing a Lord of the Rings TV show


Television

51 to 100 of 199 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The new show is looking more and more like it will be telling the story of the forging of the Rings of Power and the original war between Sauron and the Elves.

That's pretty good actually. Lots of new characters (Celebrimbor, Sauron-as-Annatar) and some familiar ones (Galadriel, Elrond, Celeborn), it brings in the Numenoreans and the elves of Eregion, touches on Moria etc. A good mix of material familiar from the movies and new in origin.

Most intriguingly, it looks like Amazon may have secured some sort of deal to use material from Unfinished Tales, particularly the stuff touching on this time period. Excellent!


Well I'm sold. Anything that gets Unfinished Tales and some Simallarion is pretty good news to me!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Maybe. I think I may actually be less excited about this idea than about the pre-LotR Aragorn wanderings idea.

It's too big. Too epic. Too much that has to be brought in and explained and set up. And not story-like enough. There's almost a hundred years between Annatar/Celebrimbor and the actual war.

And the war itself is pretty inconclusive - The elves get driven back to a few strongholds. At the last moment a host from Numenor shows up and drives Sauron's armies back from Eriador and the coastlines, but can't actually finish the job.

There are certainly some cool scenes you could come up with, but they're kind of scattered around times and characters. I don't really see what kind of coherent story you could make out of it.

The Exchange

I think it depends how they do it. LotR and The Hobbit are novels. The other stuff is mostly imaginary history, covering a borad span of time quickly, and to some extent as dry as that in the execution. The novels are almost footnotes in that broader undertaking. So they have the scope to build things out in much more detail. My main caveat to that would be that it probably wouldn't be much to do with Tolkien except in general outline. <shrug> I never really liked the Silmarilion much so I can't get very excited. I dunno, one hopes in all that massive budget they spent some money on decent scripts.


Well, if WB is involved... I wonder if they'll do any ties to the Shadow of Mordor game series.


Still think doing Lost Tales is way cooler than doing just like the entire Simallarion.


Quote:
Well, if WB is involved... I wonder if they'll do any ties to the Shadow of Mordor game series.

The video games are adequate in gameplay, but horrible in story and lore. I can imagine the Tolkien Estate vetoing against even the vaguest idea that those games are official or canon in any way, shape or form.

Quote:
Still think doing Lost Tales is way cooler than doing just like the entire Simallarion.

You mean Unfinished Tales? The Book of Lost Tales is The Silmarillion (or at least an early draft of it).


Wert,

Yeah that's what I meant....


Updates on the Amazon LotR series.

Amazon have released a series of maps which seem to confirm that the TV series will now be set firmly in the Second Age of Middle-earth. So, no hobbits but the Numenoreans will show up, along with the elves and Sauron. Based on the maps, it appears that the story might be multi-generational, spanning the period from the forging of the Rings of Power to the War of the Last Alliance that ended the Second Age, a period of 1700 years. The last map makes a big deal of Numenor being there in particular.

This is great. The original idea - "The Amazing Adventures of Young Aragorn" - was a bit rubbish, so seeing them go deep-diving into the lore is excellent.

Even more intriguing is that the map of Numenor and many of the place names on the Second Age map are copyrighted as part of Unfinished Tales. Amazon must have persuaded the Tolkien Estate to let them licence the rights to Unfinished Tales. That suggests that if the project is successful, they might even get the Silmarillion rights later on.

The show is expected to start production in November for a mid-2021 release.


As I said above, "The Amazing Adventures of Young Aragorn" might be a bit simpler and less exciting, but it's also a lot more coherent.

It's a lot harder to make a good narrative out of scenes scattered across multiple continents, centuries and characters. All of which will need to be established for our brief visits to them.

Liberty's Edge RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16

They could pull it off in a few different ways. Either they could make each season be a different time period, then time jump in the next season to the next significant period in a story like that.

Or they could have two time periods where the story takes place in, and have one be a series of flashbacks from the other.


Or use Elves (as the focus/ viewpoint characters)...

?

<shrug>

The Exchange

Meh... Whatever. It's going to be Tolkien's outline (maybe) but not really his work. And it's a bit disingenuous to call it Lord of the Rings since that is a specific novel and this, well, isn't that. I dunno. I don't want to be the miserablist Tolkien bore and if this excites people then great, but I've a feeling this will be low on my watching priorities. Then again, I didn't like the LotR movies all that much as they went a bit Hollywood for me, and got bored with Game of Thrones because it different from the books (I just hope George doesn't die before he finishes the book series). So perhaps these adaptations aren't really for me, and that just my problem rather than anyone else's.

Scarab Sages

If the series does cover the creation of the Rings of Power and the downfall of Numenor, I wonder who they'll get to play Sauron. If I recall correctly, during those times he could still appear "fair of form" which is how he fooled the elves when the rings were forged, and later corrupted the people of Numenor.

If the series is successful, I'd also love to see the war against the Witch-King of Angmar.

Liberty's Edge RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16

For the amount Amazon reportedly paid, there's going to be at least 5 seasons, successful or not. $250 million for the rights, and $250 million more committed to 5 seasons, @ $50 million each.

EDIT: And that doesn't include however many million is spend on advertising!


JoelF847 wrote:

For the amount Amazon reportedly paid, there's going to be at least 5 seasons, successful or not. $250 million for the rights, and $250 million more committed to 5 seasons, @ $50 million each.

EDIT: And that doesn't include however many million is spend on advertising!

That's not correct. Amazon have indeed paid $250 million combined to the Tolkien Estate and New Line/Warner Brothers for the rights, but their agreed budget-per-season has a window of $100-150 million per season. At the top end that's $1 billion for the rights and all five seasons, which would comfortably make this the most expensive ongoing TV show ever made.


All I know is this: There had better be some mention of the saga of Beran. Just because I like that guy.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:
All I know is this: There had better be some mention of the saga of Beran. Just because I like that guy.

Even better, if The Silmarillion rights are now in play, we might get a direction adaptation of that story a few years down the road.


That would be cool, especially if they do Hurin's story too.


GoT writer-producer Bryan Cogman has taken over the series as showrunner.


Big update.

J.A. Bayona (THE ORPHANAGE, THE IMPOSSIBLE, A MONSTER CALLS, er, JURASSIC PARK: FALLEN KINGDOM) will direct the first two episodes.

Gennifer Hutchison (BREAKING BAD, BETTER CALL SAUL) has been added to the writing room.

After a huge battle between Scotland and New Zealand, New Zealand has emerged victorious and the new show - with the working title LORD OF THE RINGS: THE SECOND AGE - will shoot in that country once again. However, production will be based in Auckland rather than Wellington as in Jackson's movies.

Also some clarification: Bryan Cogman has joined the show as an advisor and producer, as he was added to the project when writing for the show was already at an advanced stage. He may have an expanded role for Season 2.


Well it's nice to know Middle Earth gets to stay in Middle Earth aka New Zealand.


Full creative team revealed.


And now we have a summary:

Quote:
Amazon Studios’ forthcoming series brings to screens for the very first time the heroic legends of the fabled Second Age of Middle-earth’s history. This epic drama is set thousands of years before the events of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, and will take viewers back to an era in which great powers were forged, kingdoms rose to glory and fell to ruin, unlikely heroes were tested, hope hung by the finest of threads, and the greatest villain that ever flowed from Tolkien’s pen threatened to cover all the world in darkness. Beginning in a time of relative peace, the series follows an ensemble cast of characters, both familiar and new, as they confront the long-feared re-emergence of evil to Middle-earth. From the darkest depths of the Misty Mountains, to the majestic forests of the elf-capital of Lindon, to the breathtaking island kingdom of Númenor, to the furthest reaches of the map, these kingdoms and characters will carve out legacies that live on long after they are gone.

They're currently roughly halfway through shooting the first season, with it likely to air on Amazon in 2022.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

I'll likely watch the first episode to see if it grabs me, but after the disappointment that was The Hobbit I'm not holding my breath.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I think an entire show of Tom Bombadil would be cool. I don't know how many folks were clamoring for the second age of Middle Earth. Still, cool I guess.

I feel like a bad nerd for saying this, but I read The Hobbit and was like "those Hobbits are really cool! I want more about them." As such I never read The Silmarillion. I never studied the deeper lore about the Vala or other angels (or whatever they are) and the lineages of the elves and all that.

I liked these books specifically because as a kid I was small, and overlooked, and basically lived this sheltered little life until the larger world came crashing in on a personal level. I want to know more about the folk that would much rather tend gardens, eat cakes, and write books, but every once in a while they have to rise up and save the world. A world where a gardener and a bachelor nephew can out-hero kings, soldiers, wizards and giant eagles, because they had the will to see it through to the end.

So I don't know if I'll watch this show as anything other than a swords and sorcery romp through interesting sets. If the people are sexy and the action is cool, I'll probably stick with it. If not, meh.


Mark Hoover 330 wrote:
I think an entire show of Tom Bombadil would be cool. I don't know how many folks were clamoring for the second age of Middle Earth. Still, cool I guess.

I have a suspicion that they chose the time period for two reasons. The first is that since they had to use the name "Lord of the Rings" for legal reasons, you kind of have to make it about Sauron, and this is the best way of doing that.

The second is that this time period was very heavily alluded to (in long flashbacks) in the two MIDDLE-EARTH: SHADOW games, complete with scenes of Annatar corrupting Celebrimbor and forging the rings, and those seemed to go down very well, so I suspect that at least factored into the thinking process.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Amazon said they will have different ethnicities of Hobbits in the show.

This is a prequel right? So that means if they add black hobbits, but there aren't any in the later movies, then... there was an ethnic cleansing in the Shire.

Liberty's Edge RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16

CapeCodRPGer wrote:

Amazon said they will have different ethnicities of Hobbits in the show.

This is a prequel right? So that means if they add black hobbits, but there aren't any in the later movies, then... there was an ethnic cleansing in the Shire.

I'm not up on deep or historical Middle Earth lore, but do hobbit exist in this time period?


JoelF847 wrote:
CapeCodRPGer wrote:

Amazon said they will have different ethnicities of Hobbits in the show.

This is a prequel right? So that means if they add black hobbits, but there aren't any in the later movies, then... there was an ethnic cleansing in the Shire.

I'm not up on deep or historical Middle Earth lore, but do hobbit exist in this time period?

If it's in the Second Age, it's before there's any documented mention of hobbits and long, long before before the Shire. That doesn't mean they don't exist. There's not a lot of information in the annals about anything in Middle-Earth during this period other than Numenor and a few bits about how they interacted with the rest of Middle-Earth. Plenty of room for hobbits to exist.

The earliest records of hobbits come some thousand years into the 3rd age when they emigrated from the Vales of Anduin into Eriador (and eventually into Bree/the Shire). They'd been living there unnoticed for no one knows how long.

To go back the CapeCodRPGer's question there wouldn't need to have been an ethnic cleansing and it likely wouldn't have been in the Shire. Any more than ethnic cleansing was why Britain was overwhelmingly white before colonial times despite black humans existing. The black hobbits could be an entirely different branch, already living separate from the group that would eventually migrate into Eriador. Even at that time hobbits were already split into 3 groups - Stoors, Harfoots and Fallohides. Other groups could easily have existed previously or still exist elsewhere.

I do hope they won't make these hobbits too much like Shire hobbits - they shouldn't at this stage be a stand-in for early modern English villagers. Which does run the risk of making "black hobbits" more primitive than "white hobbits".


I agree with Jeff, black hobbits shouldn't be the more primitive than white ones.


If they would just cast the best actors, and leave it at that, they could obviate the seemingly inevitable misunderstandings this will generate.

Tolkien wanted a mythology that was thoroughly Anglo-Saxon.... because Norse mythology existed, Greek mythology existed, Celtic mythology existed, etc., but no such thing existed for the Anglo-Saxon peoples outside of Beowulf and the late tale of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Not exactly and extensive legendarium, so Tolkien wrote his own.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:
I agree with Jeff, black hobbits shouldn't be the more primitive than white ones.

But at the same time, the hobbits of the Anduin Vale were more so than the hobbits of the Shire.

Of course, that's mostly because the Shire itself is an anomaly, being closer to the reader's world than the rest of the setting is.


There was also direct influence of the (now late) Kingdom of Arnor on the Shire Hobbits.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quark Blast wrote:
There was also direct influence of the (now late) Kingdom of Arnor on the Shire Hobbits.

Sure, but Arnor fell a thousand years before LotR and for centuries before that had been a shadow of the power of Gondor. The Shire and the Breelands are the backwater remnants of a backwater kingdom, with practically no neighbors, though there is some small scale long distance trade. That's not a situation that calls for rapid social/technological progress.

Despite that, they're based loosely on idealized early 20th century English villages, while everything else is medievalish.


Agreed.*

* Still though I don't see the point of proto-hobbits with a seemingly forced non-canonical ethnicity. Maybe I'll be surprised and Amazon et al will do something modern yet Tolkien-like with the whole idea.... I truly hope they surprise me; though it be a wan hope. A veritable gossamer thread tethered to fond memories of lazy sunny days reading in a shaded glen of the Green Hill Country.

Sovereign Court Director of Community

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Removed a post that was racism wrapped in a joke. The zero-tolerance for hate speech applies to race as well as gender, so consider this a general warning about the current direction of this thread. Thank you for helping keep the forums a positive place to engage with others.

Scarab Sages

Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

Official title announcement video!


In the Land of Mordor where the Shadow lies...


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

Shadows Lie…


Aberzombie wrote:

Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

Official title announcement video!

Shades of a FPS cut-scene. Yikes!

Liberty's Edge RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quark Blast wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:

Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

Official title announcement video!

Shades of a FPS cut-scene. Yikes!

they actually physically forged the metal and filmed it - wasn't computer generated at all.


Good to know, Joel.


JoelF847 wrote:
Quark Blast wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:

Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

Official title announcement video!

Shades of a FPS cut-scene. Yikes!
they actually physically forged the metal and filmed it - wasn't computer generated at all.

Well at least it wasn't MoCap.


Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

Molten pewter, very hard to put the little balls on for tracking purposes.

Scarab Sages

Amazon’s Lord of the Rings Series Rises: Inside The Rings of Power

I've got to say, the more I hear about this, the less thrilled I am about it. I might still give it a try, but I can no longer say I'm cautiously optimistic. Quite the opposite.

From beardless dwarven princess, through Galadriel Warrior Princess, all the way up to ambitious politician Elrond, some of the details are just making me cringe a bit. And there appears to be a half-elf with wooden, Green Man armor. WTF is that all about?

This seems to be what happens when you allow your show creators to be two dudes who seem to have no experience (according to IMDb, anyway).

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I am just hopeful that the new show can bring the Hobbit and LotR film fans together for once.

I've given up pretty much any hope that the Amazon series is anything more than a "modern interpretation" of the setting and lore which is... not what I want... at all. The WORST parts of all LotR media have all universally come from producers, directors, and film execs deciding to tinker with and change things to bring them more into line with modern society, culture, and film industry norms and have almost universally been lambasted as taking away from the integrity of the work.

I want to be hopeful and believe that is will be good and more or less faithful to the material but I fear it's going to be another Wheel of Time situation.


Aberzombie wrote:


This seems to be what happens when you allow your show creators to be two dudes who seem to have no experience (according to IMDb, anyway).

They each have one credit prior to this just like 2 other dudes allowed to be show creators who seemed to have no experience. And Game of Thrones worked out pretty well for those guys.

Scarab Sages

Themetricsystem wrote:


I've given up pretty much any hope that the Amazon series is anything more than a "modern interpretation" of the setting and lore which is... not what I want... at all. The WORST parts of all LotR media have all universally come from producers, directors, and film execs deciding to tinker with and change things to bring them more into line with modern society, culture, and film industry norms and have almost universally been lambasted as taking away from the integrity of the work.

I think that's a pretty solid assessment.

51 to 100 of 199 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Entertainment / Television / Warner Brothers and Amazon developing a Lord of the Rings TV show All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.