| Atalius |
The prerequisites state: Str 25, Improved Grapple, Improved Unarmed Strike, ogre, size Large or larger.
My question is in regards to the size prerequisite, would I have to get permanent Enlarge? Or could I become temporarily Enlarged and have access to the feat while in that enlarged state, and thus losing it temporarily while being medium sized again.
| Java Man |
You will not find this in the CRB, all it has is the following:
"Some feats have prerequisites. Your character must have the indicated ability score, class feature, feat, skill, base attack bonus, or other quality designated in order to select or use that feat. A character can gain a feat at the same level at which he gains the prerequisite.
A character can't use a feat if he loses a prerequisite, but he does not lose the feat itself. If, at a later time, he regains the lost prerequisite, he immediately regains full use of the feat that prerequisite enables."
So it is clear how it works when you lose a pq, but not how, or if, you can use something temporary as a pq.
| graystone |
The general developer consensus is that in order to qualify for a feat, you have to have had all the prerequisites for 24 hours.
That's 100% not true.
• A brawler can use the feats granted by brawler's flurry to qualify for other feats, but can only use those other feats when using brawler's flurry (as that's the only time she actually meets those prerequisites).
As brawler's flurry in IMPOSSIBLE to have active 24 hours, Jason disagrees with you.
| Atalius |
Doomed Hero wrote:The general developer consensus is that in order to qualify for a feat, you have to have had all the prerequisites for 24 hours.
That's 100% not true.
Jason Bulmahn wrote:• A brawler can use the feats granted by brawler's flurry to qualify for other feats, but can only use those other feats when using brawler's flurry (as that's the only time she actually meets those prerequisites).As brawler's flurry in IMPOSSIBLE to have active 24 hours, Jason disagrees with you.
Very good point. Another name I am unfamiliar with my apologies, is Jason another Designer?
| Jeraa |
graystone wrote:Very good point. Another name I am unfamiliar with my apologies, is Jason another Designer?Doomed Hero wrote:The general developer consensus is that in order to qualify for a feat, you have to have had all the prerequisites for 24 hours.
That's 100% not true.
Jason Bulmahn wrote:• A brawler can use the feats granted by brawler's flurry to qualify for other feats, but can only use those other feats when using brawler's flurry (as that's the only time she actually meets those prerequisites).As brawler's flurry in IMPOSSIBLE to have active 24 hours, Jason disagrees with you.
Jason Bulmahn isn't just another designer, but the lead designer of Pathfinder.
| Cavall |
Doomed Hero wrote:The general developer consensus is that in order to qualify for a feat, you have to have had all the prerequisites for 24 hours.
That's 100% not true.
Jason Bulmahn wrote:• A brawler can use the feats granted by brawler's flurry to qualify for other feats, but can only use those other feats when using brawler's flurry (as that's the only time she actually meets those prerequisites).As brawler's flurry in IMPOSSIBLE to have active 24 hours, Jason disagrees with you.
It could be 100% true and your statement could still be true.
After all he said general consensus. Yours is specific.
| Create Mr. Pitt |
General consensus has a different meaning than general v. specific meanings of a rule.
Doomed claimed that it was a general developer consensus that you have to have the prerequisite for 24 hours.
Greystone correctly pointed out that this is not true, and provided a specific example of where the developers discussed how this rule applies to brawler's flurry. This is pretty compelling evidence that there is no general consensus that 24 hours of the prerequisite is required.
Of course, you are literally correct, maybe it is the general consensus. But I have never seen it, and the specific example in the case is strong evidence that there is a lack of such a consensus.