"Levels of different classes that are entitled to familiars stack for the purpose of determining any familiar abilities that depend on the master's level."
They are not independent, like most other class features. Thus you do not get 2 familiars.
To the interaction between a Figment Familiar and the Witch, just stick to the rules: As ong as you dont switch out the Figment you cant have your living spellbook. Which effectively makes spellcasting ... a bit difficult.
Specific trumps general. You either get two familiars and the figment doesn't benefit from your witch levels or you become incompatable with the witch class and must talk to your GM about getting rid of the figment archetype
As his GM, I too am curious if there is an official answer or not.
Would the interaction work differently if the Witch was the Gravewalker Archetype?
I would think that since you are replacing the entire Familiar portion of the witch class, then that class wouldn't be considered one that grants you a familiar anymore, so you would still have the familiar, but it would still only have 1 level from the sorcerer class.
A FAQ on Animal Companions may supply some insight.
Based on that FAQ, if the two class abilities (that normally stack) are incompatible then they don't stack.
However, this is not that situation. Instead of being forced into an inappropriate familiar type due to a class ability you have selected an inappropriate familiar type.
In short, your familiar cannot have the figment archetype if you want it to function correctly for a Witch. Select a new familiar.
As for the Gravewalker archetype, Gravewalkers do not have a familiar so there is no conflict. You have your familiar ability from your other class and it does not interact in any way with a Gravewalker Witch.
I'm pretty sure the PFS ruling would say that you simply can't do this, but PFS explicitly forbids multiple "pets".
I'd see RA[IW] as the only way you can do this is to treat them as separate, unrelated class features of two different classes. A Wiz3/Wit3 gets two third-level familiars.
GinoA, the problem here is that this is not two different class features. They are the same compatible class feature.
It is the player's choice of choosing an incompatible familiar archetype that is the problem. The familiar archetype should go.
To put this another way:
Lets assume you are a Sorcerer3/Witch3 and you had a single (effectively level 6) familiar.
The familiar dies.
Can you select a new familiar with the Figment archetype? No.
Can you take two familiars to get around the figment archetype restriction? No, the classes familiar abilties stack because they are compatible so you must select a familiar that can be used for both classes.
I already answered that LtSmokin. In that case you have one class with a Familiar and one class without. It would be no different than if you had a Sorcerer/Fighter.
zainale, no it wouldn't work. The stone familiar teaches the familiar the spells, it is not a replacement for the familiar.
It basically guarantees that you do not lose your spells if you have to replace your familiar.
A FAQ on Animal Companions may supply some insight.
Based on that FAQ, if the two class abilities (that normally stack) are incompatible then they don't stack.
However, this is not that situation. Instead of being forced into an inappropriate familiar type due to a class ability you have selected an inappropriate familiar type.
In short, your familiar cannot have the figment archetype if you want it to function correctly for a Witch. Select a new familiar.
As for the Gravewalker archetype, Gravewalkers do not have a familiar so there is no conflict. You have your familiar ability from your other class and it does not interact in any way with a Gravewalker Witch.
I'm in complete agreement with everything Gauss is saying.
@LtSmokin, if your character happens to be a half-elf then the Bonded Witch archetype is another familiar-less option.
zainale, no it wouldn't work. The stone familiar teaches the familiar the spells, it is not a replacement for the familiar.
It basically guarantees that you do not lose your spells if you have to replace your familiar.
And even if it did work, the stone familiar doesn't have rules for learning spells without a living familiar. Normal witch familiars can get spells by having your use a scroll. The stone familiar can only get them from other witch's familiars.
So unless there is another witch in your party, then you would be out of luck. In the hypothetical scenario that you could ever use a stone familiar as a failiar.
|
As a GM I would be very hesitant to allow a player control of more than two characters at once. The action economy afforded a player with two characters is already strong enough. I might allow the two familiars, but would pull a PFS and say that only one can be used during combat. Still, unless they had a really compelling reason I would most likely say that the figment familiar manifests as a real familiar when the character gains the witch level and loses its figment archetype.