Do Pearls of Power count as "gems" for the Scarab Sages faction card?


Pathfinder Society

1 to 50 of 161 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Liberty's Edge 2/5

17 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

...how about Elemental Gems (etc.), or do they have to be monetary gems in found treasure only?

1/5

Or, for that matter, Ioun Stones.

4/5 *

I'd say no - the value is supposed to be about the quality of the gem, and a magic item's value includes all the magic stuff - they might just be shiny rocks for all we know.

4/5 ****

I'd say yes - they are gems and meet the value requirement.

Scarab Sages 2/5 5/55/55/55/5

I'd say yes as well. Likewise Elemental Gems, Gems of Brightness, etc. The card does not specify that the gems have to be mundane.

Liberty's Edge 2/5

It may boil down to whether the magical component counts or not. The text from the faction card does not specify it must be non-magical:

Quote:
Recover a gem worth at least 400 gp plus 100 gp per level you possess during an adventure.

It seems the game considers pearls to be gems since they are listed as semi-precious Gems having 50gp in value:

http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/ultimateEquipment/appendix.html#gems-and -jewelry

Silver Crusade 3/5

I would say yes, but I would use the selling price (1/2 of the buying price) as the value of the gem/pearl/ioun stone. So a 1st-level pearl of power would qualify for a level 1 character (500 gp required), but not a level 2 character (600 gp required).

Liberty's Edge 5/5

I would say no for the same reason as GM Lamplighter.

4/5

I would say no. I think the implication was that the sages want you to find rare starting materials for their own particular use if gems.

1/5

I would say that they do count.

While we can not craft magic items the CRB does state that Crafting Wondrous Items costs half of the final value. Assuming that you are casting the spell from memory/known that means that the cost of materials, ie the pearl/gem, is half the final cost of the item.

Edit: Ninja'd

Liberty's Edge 2/5

So, something like 50/50 on the poll so far. Is there such a thing as a higher authority for questions like this?

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Yup. Mike Brock.

I am with the 1/2 cost group.

Liberty's Edge 2/5

Do we have to say his name three times while looking in a mirror?

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Nope, you just have to get everyone to hit the FAQ button on the top post in this thread.

5/5 5/55/55/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Dangling beer over the thread couldn't hurt either....:)

4/5

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Just gonna point this part out on the journal cards:

http://paizo.com/paizo/blog/v5748dyo5lhcl wrote:

Some of these goals are really open-ended. Is that on purpose?

Yes. As noted, some are open-ended and others are very precise, and that's by design. It broadens the opportunities that PCs have to pursue these objectives, rather than forcing them to cherry-pick the one or two scenarios that would work—even tougher if you've already played that adventure. What this means is that there is a little GM interpretation involved in whether or not a PC actually fulfilled an objective. The Faction Journal Cards' introductory page advises GMs to err on the side of leniency when making that call.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 RPG Superstar 2015 Top 16, RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16

I would say they do count. They are gems, and they have value. Nothing in the faction journal card indicates whether that value can't include magic. I'd also say they're worth the purchase price, not the cost.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

I say no, because the cost isn't based on them being Gems, rather magical items. So once they become a wondrous item, mechanically they are no longer a gem.

A gem is a mundane stone with a cost.

And most Ioun Stones are made of semi-precious stones, not Gems.

Dark Archive 5/5 *

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Maps Subscriber

This is extremely pedantic, but I would not allow a Pearl of Power to count for the faction goal because a pearl isn't a gem. It's in that same category as ivory, id est yes it's pretty, yes it's used in jewelry, but no it isn't a gemstone.

Like I said, extremely pedantic.

Sovereign Court 1/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Count it.

As the introductory page says, leniency.

No need to nit it up.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Quadstriker wrote:

Count it.

As the introductory page says, leniency.

No need to nit it up.

There is leniency, and the allowing things that by their very definition dont apply.

Semi precious stones and other expensive items are not necessarily synonymous with gems.

Gemstones have a specific definition. Typically they are diamonds, various types of corundum (ruby, sapphire, emerald) and other very rare stones like Opals and Topaz.

So where does leniency take you? Well its a stone and has a value, therefore its a gemstone? I disagree with that concept.

2/5 *

According to Wikipedia Pearls are Gemstones. and the definition of Gem includes semi precious stones.

gem
jem/Submit
noun
1.
a precious or semiprecious stone, especially when cut and polished or engraved.
synonyms: jewel, gemstone, stone, precious stone, semiprecious stone; More
verbrare
1.
decorate with or as with gems.

So going by the actual definition of Gem and the advice to be lenient in the application of the successes I would say yes.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

The GMG defines gems for pathfinder. Medium value gem stones are roughly 100gp and include most pearls. Pearls of power are defined as average pearls. I'd rank them in this category.

Ioun Stones are defined as crystalline stones. Which would most likely be at best the 50gp variety (typical cost of masterwork mundane items and what crystal stone or quartz sits on the GMG chart).

I will revise my original opinion.

I would give you credit for a 100go gem for a pearl if power or a 50gp gem for an ioun stone.

The magical properties of the stones does not enhance the value of the gem itself.

2/5 *

GMG is not an approved Additional Resources.

Silver Crusade 3/5

I will give credit for the resale value of any gem. For pearls of power, elemental gems, ioun stones, etc., that will be 1/2 the cost of the item.

5/5 *****

Gamerskum wrote:
GMG is not an approved Additional Resources.

Additional Resources only applies to available player options, not material GM's can draw from.

I would use the full value of magical gems, the card doesn't specify inherent or gem only value, it just refers to worth.

Sczarni 5/5

The idea is to open up as many possibilities with in the scenarios as possible. Can you list ten scenarios off the top of your head that have a mundane gem worth enough to qualify? We are Pathfinders and are all about the magical items not the gold and jewels. I say yes a pearl of power would count.

Silver Crusade 3/5

andreww wrote:
I would use the full value of magical gems, the card doesn't specify inherent or gem only value, it just refers to worth.

I can totally respect that. In my opinion, the value of something is what one can sell it for. But I think your view has merit as well, and certainly is more lenient toward the players—which is a very good thing.

5/5 5/55/55/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Yes no yes no yes no yes no...

What.. I'm allowed to chase my tail. Whats your excu.. OOO TAIL!

yes no yes no....

Grand Lodge 4/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

My judgement is that each GM gets to decide for themselves if any specific item counts. The faction goals are not meant to be legalistically nailed to the floor. If you believe it counts, then it counts. If not, then it doesn't.

2/5 *

If the GMG is allowed for GM's why is it not listed in the Core Assumption for Gm's then?

Scarab Sages 4/5 5/55/55/5

Oh my Nethys! If my application for Jeweled Sage is accepted I better not be given a Pearl of Power (1) and told "this is the best we could come up with." I will just.... go blow something up, and it might possibly be the little pearl!

Sovereign Court 5/5 5/55/5

If we're going to split hairs, then let's not stop halfway. See, pearls of power aren't average pearls; they're "seemingly normal pearl[s] of average size and luster." They're not average, just normal and of average quality. If they were intended to be valued as average pearls from the GMG, then clearly they would have been listed as "average pearls."

That sounds absurd, doesn't it? That's not normal. But on legalism, it is. We're specifically instructed to view these faction missions in the player's favor; I fail to see how we're doing that by arguing that magic gems aren't gems.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Aren't pearls made from clams or mussels? And gems are some kind of mineral deposit structure / kind of stone? I really just need Steven Huffstutler to come in here and define gems for me--he's got that geologist savvy.

From my basic understanding, however, I think that gems and pearls are pretty different things. Just like I wouldn't allow gold teeth to count as gems, I wouldn't allow pearls of power.

4/5 5/55/55/5 **** Venture-Lieutenant, Minnesota—Minneapolis

I guess it depends on if there are any 1500 gp high quality gems or jewels to be found in scenarios.

In the scenarios I've played through, I can't think of any large gems. Now most of those are in the 1-5 tier, but still I don't think they are commonly called out specifically. On the other hand, it may be that I just don't remember them because it was never an issue before.

Liberty's Edge 2/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.

@Walter, I just so happen to be a geologist.

Pearls are pretty pure Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3), but then so are the thousand(s)+ ft. limestone cliff exposures of the Rocky Mountains about 75km west of my home here in Calgary. Minearologically, they are the same.

Limestone is an agglomeration of mostly animal skeletal fragments composed of CaCO3, and pearls are an accreted mineral formation made of CaCo3. If one were to bury a pile of pearls, they would become Limestone over time.

[/geology lession]

Anyway, we're near the 50/50 range still with no overwhelming edge in terms of seniority. I think that barring a contraindication from him whose name does not need to be said three times, I'm going to go with Yes, in the spirit of the Leniency stuff outlined above.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Gamerskum wrote:
If the GMG is allowed for GM's why is it not listed in the Core Assumption for Gm's then?

Because the GMG includes rules and materials GMs need to reference, and is encompassed by the blanket statement that GMs can use the PRD to prepare scenarios.

For instance, the Chase rules are in the GMG. Some of the scenarios that use Chases include the basics, but the full rules are available only in the GMG.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

Oh? I didn't know pearls could also be formed geologically. I thought that they were primarily formed inside clams, hence the whole pearl diving thing that happens in the tropics.

4/5

For those saying "yes", what is your argument for intent? In game, why would the sages want you to find an enchanted pearl that every third level wizard owns at least one of?

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

Eric Ives wrote:
For those saying "yes", what is your argument for intent? In game, why would the sages want you to find an enchanted pearl that every third level wizard owns at least one of?

Why would they want you to find a non-magical gem any successful merchant could buy for his mistress?

Grand Lodge 4/5

Where exactly on the faction card do you find anything to base intent off of?

4/5

My understanding of the point of the faction cards is to add flavor. We know that the sages are interested in gems as a tool for storing memories, as shown in the bonuses on the card. A mundane gem of such value would still be a rare thing, though as Kevin points out, not completely out of the reach of non-adventurers.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Eric Ives wrote:
My understanding of the point of the faction cards is to add flavor. We know that the sages are interested in gems as a tool for storing memories, as shown in the bonuses on the card.

Do we know that pearls are unsuitable for such purposes? What are you basing that on?

4/5

Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
Eric Ives wrote:
My understanding of the point of the faction cards is to add flavor. We know that the sages are interested in gems as a tool for storing memories, as shown in the bonuses on the card.
Do we know that pearls are unsuitable for such purposes? What are you basing that on?

Oh, I have know way of knowing if a mundane pearl could be used, but I don't think an already enchanted pearl could be.

5/5 5/55/55/5

Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
Eric Ives wrote:
My understanding of the point of the faction cards is to add flavor. We know that the sages are interested in gems as a tool for storing memories, as shown in the bonuses on the card.
Do we know that pearls are unsuitable for such purposes? What are you basing that on?

Generally if something already has an enchantment on it you can't enchant it again with/to be something else. If a pearl is a receptacle for a spell making it a receptacle for a mind could be harder.

*plants saddle on the fence*

Sczarni 5/5 * Venture-Lieutenant, Washington—Pullman

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Walter Sheppard wrote:

Aren't pearls made from clams or mussels? And gems are some kind of mineral deposit structure / kind of stone? I really just need Steven Huffstutler to come in here and define gems for me--he's got that geologist savvy.

From my basic understanding, however, I think that gems and pearls are pretty different things. Just like I wouldn't allow gold teeth to count as gems, I wouldn't allow pearls of power.

Alright I'm here.

Geology:

No Pearls are not minerals.
To be a mineral a substance must be: Naturally occurring, inorganic, solid, definite chemical composition, and an ordered atomic arrangement.

Pearls are made up of CaCO3 an Conchiolin(which is a complex protein). This disqualifies it from being a mineral.

Gems?:

The question as to whether a pearl is a gem is open to some debate. Strictly speaking gems(gemstones) are 'a piece of mineral crystal'; however, that has not stopped people from calling semiprecious stones and organic materials gems.

Examples:
Organic
Amber, Ammolite, Bone, Coral, Jet, Mother of Pearl, Ivory, Pearls, and Shells
Fossilized Organisms
Petrified Woods and Fossil Corals
Inorganic Mineraloids
Obsidian and Opal
Rocks
Lapis lazuli, Unakite, Agates, Jade

Opinion:

Pearl of Power=Gem=Faction Boon Qualification? In my opinion this is firmly at the discretion of the table GM.

From the Magic Item Creation section wrote:
Cost: This is the cost in gold pieces to create the item. Generally this cost is equal to half the price of an item, but additional material components might increase this number. the cost to create includes the costs derived from the base cost plus the costs of the components.

In the description for a pearl of power it does not call out the need for a material component worth enough to qualify for the Faction card boon. It is valuable for the magic it contains not for the gem.

That is why at my tables I say no, same as an Elemental Gem would not count. That is how I rule it. If you do not agree, rule it how you want at your tables.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

Thanks Steve, that makes sense.

Liberty's Edge 2/5

7 people marked this as a favorite.

It is amazing the lengths some people will go to to attempt to regulate fun.

These aren't supposed to be super duper rare and difficult accomplishments here folks, just deeds that support the general feel and "agenda" of your faction.

Sheesh.

4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yes but for some of us these accomplishments are a little more meaningful and fun if they're not trivial for our characters to accomplish. That's not to say that all goals should be rare achievements but having to hunt around a bit and hope you get what you need is part of the fun in my opinion.

Grand Lodge 5/5

*Gems will be counted, but magical value on gems will not be counted. Value from magic on gems will be donated to the church of Asmodeus, whom I agree to worship for eternity. Also I agree that I am lame*

The tiefling lowers his magnifying glass.See, It's all here in the fine print. Wait a moment. He rapidly scrolls through the parchment. This isn't the scarab sages faction journal, it's the mortgage I set up for that Half-Orc idiot from the Silver Crusade. Umm... gotta run

1 to 50 of 161 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Do Pearls of Power count as "gems" for the Scarab Sages faction card? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.