Spear and Rapid Shot and Many Shot


Rules Questions


In pathfinder society can I use those feats with a spear? Also do I need quick draw?


redviiper wrote:
In pathfinder society can I use those feats with a spear? Also do I need quick draw?

Rapid shot yes, Manyshot no since it says bows. You are correct that you would need Quick Draw or some other manner of drawing your spears as a free action.


Manyshot only works with bows, not thrown weapons. Rapid Shot will work with thrown weapons, but yes you will need the quick draw feat in order to draw a new spear between each throw.

The Exchange

Rapid Shot, yes. Manyshot, no.

A spear is a thrown weapon, which is a subset of ranged weapons.

Rapid Shot can be used with any ranged weapon; Manyshot specifically says it only works with a bow.

Theoretically you could throw two spears without Quick Draw but you would then spend the entire next round retrieving two more spears. You want Quick Draw

Edit: and...utterly ninja'd


For spears (or any thrown weapon), you could also use Two-Weapon Fighting instead of Rapid Shot. That way, you can combine melee and thrown in the same round. You would still need Quick Draw to replace any weapons you throw.

Sczarni

redviiper wrote:
In pathfinder society can I use those feats with a spear? Also do I need quick draw?

I'm curious, what leads you to believe PFS handles this differently?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Nefreet wrote:
redviiper wrote:
In pathfinder society can I use those feats with a spear? Also do I need quick draw?
I'm curious, what leads you to believe PFS handles this differently?

What he means is, this is a general rules question, so it should be in the Rules Questions forum. This forum is for discussing things that are specific to the PFS Organized Play campaign.

Sczarni

Well, that too.

But sometimes I also want to understand why people believe PFS rules are "different" in the first place.

Scarab Sages RPG Superstar 2015 Top 16

I think this type of question would normally just be directed to the GM in a home game. "I can do X..."

Sovereign Court

I believe it's also because of an uncertainty of whether PFS actually has any specific rules on the topic.

Sczarni

But where does that uncertainty stem from?

Why do some people assume PFS rules are different in the first place?


Nefreet wrote:
Why do some people assume PFS rules are different in the first place?

I thought PFS banned some things like item creation. Thus the PFS rules are different in the first place.

Sczarni

Banning certain feats, spells, or archetypes is different from asking if Weapon Focus (longsword) gives you +1 to attack rolls with longswords.

People frequently ask "Is <option X> legal?", and we're happy to oblige them with an answer.

But when people ask a basic Pathfinder rules question, there's a disconnect going on.

I just want to understand that disconnect.

Scarab Sages

There's sufficient room for uncertainty - for example, they altered the standard Wizard, Cavalier, and Gunslinger in certain ways, and they've made some "house rules" to accommodate the Organized Play format that wouldn't be immediately obvious from reading the books (like crafter's fortune granting an inherent bonus to Craft checks made for Day Job rolls) - oh yeah, and the loads and encumbrance rules are normally ignored.

Admittedly, I agree - redviiper's asking a different category of question.


I am going to guess no, simply because a spear is a 2 handed weapon.

CRB section on thrown weapons wrote:
Throwing a light or one-handed weapon is a standard action, while throwing a two-handed weapon is a full-round action.

Short spears seem like they would be perfectly fine though, and it is pretty much the same since you can 2hand them in melee.


Could one mix rapid shot and two weapon fighting with thrown weapons though?


lemeres wrote:

I am going to guess no, simply because a spear is a 2 handed weapon.

CRB section on thrown weapons wrote:
Throwing a light or one-handed weapon is a standard action, while throwing a two-handed weapon is a full-round action.
Short spears seem like they would be perfectly fine though, and it is pretty much the same since you can 2hand them in melee.

That rule is for throwing weapons that are not designed to be thrown.


Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
That rule is for throwing weapons that are not designed to be thrown.

It is a bit hard to tell.

Thrown Weapons wrote:
Thrown Weapons: The wielder applies his Strength modifier to damage dealt by thrown weapons (except for splash weapons). It is possible to throw a weapon that isn't designed to be thrown (that is, a melee weapon that doesn't have a numeric entry in the Range column on Table: Weapons), and a character who does so takes a –4 penalty on the attack roll. Throwing a light or one-handed weapon is a standard action, while throwing a two-handed weapon is a full-round action. Regardless of the type of weapon, such an attack scores a threat only on a natural 20 and deals double damage on a critical hit. Such a weapon has a range increment of 10 feet.

The -4 penalty clause could just as easily be read as a separate sentence, unrelated to what follows. I'll admit, you could very well be right though.


lemeres wrote:
Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
That rule is for throwing weapons that are not designed to be thrown.

It is a bit hard to tell.

Thrown Weapons wrote:
Thrown Weapons: The wielder applies his Strength modifier to damage dealt by thrown weapons (except for splash weapons). It is possible to throw a weapon that isn't designed to be thrown (that is, a melee weapon that doesn't have a numeric entry in the Range column on Table: Weapons), and a character who does so takes a –4 penalty on the attack roll. Throwing a light or one-handed weapon is a standard action, while throwing a two-handed weapon is a full-round action. Regardless of the type of weapon, such an attack scores a threat only on a natural 20 and deals double damage on a critical hit. Such a weapon has a range increment of 10 feet.
The -4 penalty clause could just as easily be read as a separate sentence, unrelated to what follows. I'll admit, you could very well be right though.

Not hard to tell at all.

Quote:
Regardless of the type of weapon, such an attack scores a threat only on a natural 20 and deals double damage on a critical hit.

This sentence only makes sense in relation to the second sentence. The third sentence, therefore, must also relate to the second sentence to preserve the only sensible meaning of the paragraph as a whole.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Spear and Rapid Shot and Many Shot All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.