Detect Evil and Tieflings


Rules Questions

1 to 50 of 51 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

3 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

Does a 1HD (evil) tiefling register to a paladin's detect evil? Detect evil normally doesn't work on low-HD people, unless clerics, antipaladins, undead, and outsiders. Tieflings are outsiders, but they are native outsiders. Does this affect DE?

EDIT: Should be noted, a non-evil tiefling wouldn't ever detect. It comes from their actual alignment, not their heritage. So it seems to me it should work as it does with anybody else.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.

Exception, a tiefling who's an evil cleric or anti-paladin, would detect.


The question effectively becomes does an evil 1HD tiefling fall under the "aligned creature" or "aligned outsider" category.

I would it falls under "aligned outsider" because it is an outsider. Though there is a bit of wiggle room here to see it otherwise.


LazarX wrote:
Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.

Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment) and an alignment of evil. So a 1+ HD evil tiefling would detect as evil.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Avianfoo wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.
Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment) and an alignment of evil. So a 1+ HD evil tiefling would detect as evil.

No they would not. Detect Evil detects evil AURAS not alignment. A 1 hd non-cleric evil tiefling would not detect as evil any more than a Human would.


LazarX wrote:
Avianfoo wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.
Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment) and an alignment of evil. So a 1+ HD evil tiefling would detect as evil.
No they would not. Detect Evil detects evil AURAS not alignment. A 1 hd non-cleric evil tiefling would not detect as evil any more than a Human would.

But an aligned outsider of 1 HD or less has a faint aura. See the table here: http://paizo.com/PRD/spells/detectevil.html

Tieflings are outsiders. Or are you going to argue that Ghouls don't detect as evil because they don't have the evil sub type?


We know how aligned creatures work (must be 5HD).

We know how aligned outsiders work (even less then 1HD is detected).

The question is how a native outsider is treated. By RAW it seems to indicate they are treated as an outsider (b/c I'm not seeing anything that says otherwise, please, point it out to me, I find this silly.) By common sense I find that hard to agree w/, but common sense does not always line up w/ RAW...

EDIT: Also, common sense is subjective at times...

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Strannik wrote:
The question is how a native outsider is treated. By RAW it seems to indicate they are treated as an outsider (b/c I'm not seeing anything that says otherwise, please, point it out to me, I find this silly.) By common sense I find that hard to agree w/, but common sense does not always line up w/ RAW...

Where is the RAW that says they are detected. Detectable outsiders are so because as demons or devils, daeomns etc... they posess the evil subtype. Just as Angels posess the good subtype which makes them ping on Detect Good.

Tieflings do not. Check the racial description on the Tiefling and show me where it says they posess the evil subtype. If you can, then you've settled this thread.


LazarX wrote:
Strannik wrote:
The question is how a native outsider is treated. By RAW it seems to indicate they are treated as an outsider (b/c I'm not seeing anything that says otherwise, please, point it out to me, I find this silly.) By common sense I find that hard to agree w/, but common sense does not always line up w/ RAW...

Where is the RAW that says they are detected. Detectable outsiders are so because as demons or devils, daeomns etc... they posess the evil subtype. Just as Angels posess the good subtype which makes them ping on Detect Good.

Tieflings do not. Check the racial description on the Tiefling and show me where it says they posess the evil subtype. If you can, then you've settled this thread.

Detect evil does not detect subtypes, it detects auras, as you pointed out.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

2 people marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:
Detectable outsiders are so because as demons or devils, daeomns etc... they posess the evil subtype.

According to...?

Quote:
Tieflings do not. Check the racial description on the Tiefling and show me where it says they posess the evil subtype. If you can, then you've settled this thread.

No one is trying to claim that tieflings have the evil subtype. Honestly, I'm not even sure why you're bringing it up. Everyone here knows they don't have the evil subtype.


LazarX wrote:
Avianfoo wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.
Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment) and an alignment of evil. So a 1+ HD evil tiefling would detect as evil.
No they would not. Detect Evil detects evil AURAS not alignment. A 1 hd non-cleric evil tiefling would not detect as evil any more than a Human would.

Alignment gives the aura type so its effectively the same thing. Outsiders "auras" are faintly detectable from 1HD. Non-cleric/paladin humans are only faintly detectable from 5HD.

Tieflings/Aasimars are outsiders (native). Therefore their aura is faintly detectable from 1HD. So detect evil will pick up a 1HD evil tiefling/aasimar. Unless the native subtype removes their aura... Nope. The only thing that native changes is "Unlike true outsiders, native outsiders need to eat and sleep." Nothing about auras in there. So outsider rule applies.

Sovereign Court

A Tiefling is an outside, a native one but still an outsider to magic spells. As others have mentioned that would qualify them under the aligned outsider category and thus they their evil/good/etc can be detected for at 1 HD rather then 5 HD. The same for any of the other native outsiders.

Shadow Lodge

If you look at the table, You'll notice that Aligned Creatures are in the same column as Aligned Outsiders. If you consider that your standard human is an Aligned Creature, then it falls to the idea that any outsider is an Aligned Outsider, including native outsiders.


the PRD wrote:

Native Subtype: This subtype is applied only to outsiders. These creatures have mortal ancestors or a strong connection to the Material Plane and can be raised, reincarnated, or resurrected just as other living creatures can be. Creatures with this subtype are native to the Material Plane. Unlike true outsiders, native outsiders need to eat and sleep.

Aligned creature: Faint 5-10; Aligned outsider: Faint: 1

So...

Tiefling = Outsider

Native subtype does not adjust how they register to the spell detect evil.

Non-evil tiefling = no aura

Evil-aligned tiefling = faint aura at 1 HD


Tieflings are not an aligned outsider, because native isn't an alignment.

Whether an outsider is aligned is determined by their plane, and whether or not that plane has an alignment. Native usually means the material plane, which has no alignment. The idea is that Outsiders are so permeated with the essense of their plane that it alters their aura to reflect that plane. And if that plane has an alignment, the aura reflects that. Since Native outsiders are not from another plane, their auras are unaltered by their ancestry.

An aligned outsider is not the same as an outsider with an alignment.

Shadow Lodge

Jay the Madman wrote:
An aligned outsider is not the same as an outsider with an alignment.

You're reading the the table incorrectly. That's exactly what it means. What do you think an Aligned Creature is? Where do humans fit on that table?


Avianfoo wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.
Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment) and an alignment of evil. So a 1+ HD evil tiefling would detect as evil.

This is wrong. Your subtypes have no effect on your behavior and thus, have no effect on your alignment.


Serum wrote:
Jay the Madman wrote:
An aligned outsider is not the same as an outsider with an alignment.
You're reading the the table incorrectly. That's exactly what it means. What do you think an Aligned Creature is? Where do humans fit on that table?

Universal Monster Rules - Damage Reduction:
Some monsters are vulnerable to good-, evil-, chaotically, or lawfully aligned weapons. When a cleric casts align weapon, affected weapons might gain one or more of these properties, and certain magic weapons have these properties as well. A creature with an alignment subtype (chaotic, evil, good, or lawful) can overcome this type of damage reduction with its natural weapons and weapons it wields as if the weapons or natural weapons had an alignment (or alignments) that matched the subtype(s) of the creature.

Just a thought - Align Weapon grants a particular alignment to a weapon in order to bypass damage reduction. A creature who has a particular alignment subtype can bypass DR as well. This would sort of imply the two are equivalent - that you're temporarily granting the weapon an alignment subtype.

So I would argue that an 'Aligned Creature' would be one that has a particular alignment subtype.

Shadow Lodge

Xaratherus wrote:
Serum wrote:
Jay the Madman wrote:
An aligned outsider is not the same as an outsider with an alignment.
You're reading the the table incorrectly. That's exactly what it means. What do you think an Aligned Creature is? Where do humans fit on that table?

** spoiler omitted **

Just a thought - Align Weapon grants a particular alignment to a weapon in order to bypass damage reduction. A creature who has a particular alignment subtype can bypass DR as well. This would sort of imply the two are equivalent - that you're temporarily granting the weapon an alignment subtype.

So I would argue that an 'Aligned Creature' would be one that has a particular alignment subtype.

You realize that this would mean that barely anything but outsiders would ping for a caster using detect spells, right? Dragons, undead, humanoids, magical beasts, aberrations, etc.: It is rare for any of them to have alignment subtypes. There isn't a section in the table that covers so-called "Un-aligned" creatures.


@Serum: good point and withdrawn. I was remembering the text of the spell incorrectly, I thought there was an 'either\or' in it (either the creature has an alignment subtype OR is more than X hit dice) that's not there.


Serum wrote:
You're reading the the table incorrectly. That's exactly what it means. What do you think an Aligned Creature is? Where do humans fit on that table?

Humans would be an aligned creature, if they have an alignment. There is nothing inherently good/evil about humans, they don't have a racial effect on their aura, or whether or not it is detectable. Most outsiders (like tieflings) are the same in that regard. An aligned outsider (like an angel) is an outsider that is tied to a particular alignment.

An earth elemental with 1 HD wouldn't have an evil aura, while an imp would. Because the imp is an aligned outsider, while the earth elemental is not.


Humans are counted as an aligned creature, so why are Tieflings not counted as aligned outsiders? They are outsiders. The supertext 1 next to Aligned Creature even says "Except for undead and outsiders which have their own entries on the table."

An outsider is always an outsider. They count as an outsider for everything, not just when it is convenient to be an outsider. You can't be targeted with hold person, but yes you still register on detect spells at 1 HD. If you don't want to register on detect spells, make a True Neutral character or buy lots of potions of undetectable alignment.

Shadow Lodge

Jay the Madman wrote:
Serum wrote:
You're reading the the table incorrectly. That's exactly what it means. What do you think an Aligned Creature is? Where do humans fit on that table?

Humans would be an aligned creature, if they have an alignment. There is nothing inherently good/evil about humans, they don't have a racial effect on their aura, or whether or not it is detectable. Most outsiders (like tieflings) are the same in that regard. An aligned outsider (like an angel) is an outsider that is tied to a particular alignment.

An earth elemental with 1 HD wouldn't have an evil aura, while an imp would. Because the imp is an aligned outsider, while the earth elemental is not.

Really? You're taking the viewpoint that Aligned Creature and Aligned Outsider mean two completely different things?


Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Robert A Matthews wrote:

Humans are counted as an aligned creature, so why are Tieflings not counted as aligned outsiders? They are outsiders. The supertext 1 next to Aligned Creature even says "Except for undead and outsiders which have their own entries on the table."

An outsider is always an outsider. They count as an outsider for everything, not just when it is convenient to be an outsider. You can't be targeted with hold person, but yes you still register on detect spells at 1 HD. If you don't want to register on detect spells, make a True Neutral character or buy lots of potions of undetectable alignment.

I'd have to agree. You can't just say "I'm an outsider" when it comes to spells like Hold Person & Charm Person, but then argue that you are not an outsider when it comes to something negative, like Detect Spells. Although to be honest Detect Spells are the least of your worries as an outsider, since you will have to worry more about Smites, and other spells that are generally not healthy for outsiders (i.e. Dread Bolt & Eaglesoul)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I think part of the problem of this argument is how much be are focusing on detect evil.

Let's imagine a scene from a cop show (because it is funnier). An inquisitor collects up a line up of the 'usual suspect' (which means tieflings, because medieval fantasy worlds are...racist). They throw in some humans with glued on horns too just to make the whole farce seem fair. The inquisitor casts Detect evil, good, law, and chaos on everyone. Now, if all the people in the room were 1st level, would the tieflings set off the spell while the human doesn't? Let's say that everyone in the line up was LG both for the sake of getting away from detect evil and because it makes the indignation of the scenario all the better.

In some ways, I think that the general idea behind the detect spells is that everyone has an aura with their alignment, but humans just do not have a strong enough aura to register until they are powerful enough (clerics don't really count since they show their deity's aura). Would it be unreasonable to say that a tiefling or aasimar, outsiders that are almost always inherently magical enough to naturally get a spell like ability, simply have a stronger aura than regular humans?

In game terms, the reason native outsiders register for detect spells from 1 hd is because there are things like Oni and Rakshasa running about. The game just never made a distinction between a weak oni and a 1st level tiefling as far as subtypes go because the current one sufficed in describing them in most circumstances (the whole eating and breathing thing for example)


@lemeres

All good points.

The more I think about this, the more I'm thinking that having an aura that's more powerful might be one of the side effects of being a native outsider. It would be the same for an Aasimar.

Yes, you get some resistances. Yes, you get a spell like ability. Yes, you get all kinds of nifty things just for being you. BUT! Now it's harder to hide. So if you're evil, the paladin can find you faster. If your good the anti-paladin can find you faster. Etc, etc.

Perhaps the weakness to detect spells and the like is meant to be a balancing factor for these powerful races?


Zhayne wrote:
Avianfoo wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.
Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment) and an alignment of evil. So a 1+ HD evil tiefling would detect as evil.
This is wrong. Your subtypes have no effect on your behavior and thus, have no effect on your alignment.

I should clarify that I meant that an Evil subtype will always be detected as evil regardless of their alignment. so the statement should have been "which effectively can't be detected as a non-evil alignment".

Evil subtype wrote:
...Most creatures that have this subtype also have evil alignments; however, if their alignments change, they still retain the subtype. Any effect that depends on alignment affects a creature with this subtype as if the creature has an evil alignment, no matter what its alignment actually is. The creature also suffers effects according to its actual alignment. A creature with the evil subtype overcomes damage reduction as if its natural weapons and any weapons it wields are evil-aligned.

Tis the price of being a fiend.


LazarX wrote:

Tieflings despite their origin, do NOT posess the evil subtype. so no they would not.

Exception, a tiefling who's an evil cleric or anti-paladin, would detect.

Or a neutral cleric of an evil god.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Serum wrote:
You realize that this would mean that barely anything but outsiders would ping for a caster using detect spells, right? Dragons, undead, humanoids, magical beasts, aberrations, etc.: It is rare for any of them to have alignment subtypes. There isn't a section in the table that covers so-called "Un-aligned" creatures.

That's correct and intentional. The 4th level neutral evil baker who does nothing but think nasty thoughts while he serves his customers will not ping.

The 1st level Lawful Evil Cleric of Asmodeus WILL ping because of his aura of evil, as will the Anti-Paladin he's currently trying to screw over to a binding contract.

The 5th level neutral evil Fighter will ping as he's become quite established in his alignment and his deeds carry more significance in the big picture.

The Paladin who just came from exploring a Thassilonian ruin, also pings because he picked up a Lissalan artifact that he has no clue about because it did not activate it's aura until he claimed posession.

A red dragon that's not a hatchling will almost always ping as it's hit dice will be 5 or greater.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. 1 person marked this as a favorite.

So it sounds like the big question here is do Detect Alignment spells detect the actual alignment of an Outsider-type creature, or does it detect alignment subtypes? Or, coming at it from the other direction, what is the definition of aligned Outsider?


I think the misunderstanding here comes from the term aligned vs. aligned subtype. Pathfinder defines aligned subtype and how it applies to damage reduction. From what I can tell the term aligned subtype is different than the term aligned. All creatures are aligned, but not all creatures have the aligned subtype. This is apparent, due to the fact that an evil human over level 4 will pop as evil when someone uses detect evil on them. The fact that a human doesn’t have the evil subtype tells me, that the two terms are different. It would be good to have more input on this from the dev’s.


jlighter wrote:
So it sounds like the big question here is do Detect Alignment spells detect the actual alignment of an Outsider-type creature, or does it detect alignment subtypes? Or, coming at it from the other direction, what is the definition of aligned Outsider?

Both.

This means a Lawful Evil Azata (Chaotic and Good subtypes) pings on all Detect alignment spells.

Tieflings produce kind of a weird interaction because they're Outsiders that are descended from Evil-subtype Outsiders, but lack the appropriate subtypes.


LazarX wrote:
Serum wrote:
You realize that this would mean that barely anything but outsiders would ping for a caster using detect spells, right? Dragons, undead, humanoids, magical beasts, aberrations, etc.: It is rare for any of them to have alignment subtypes. There isn't a section in the table that covers so-called "Un-aligned" creatures.

That's correct and intentional. The 4th level neutral evil baker who does nothing but think nasty thoughts while he serves his customers will not ping.

The 1st level Lawful Evil Cleric of Asmodeus WILL ping because of his aura of evil, as will the Anti-Paladin he's currently trying to screw over to a binding contract.

The 5th level neutral evil Fighter will ping as he's become quite established in his alignment and his deeds carry more significance in the big picture.

The Paladin who just came from exploring a Thassilonian ruin, also pings because he picked up a Lissalan artifact that he has no clue about because it did not activate it's aura until he claimed posession.

A red dragon that's not a hatchling will almost always ping as it's hit dice will be 5 or greater.

What is your basis for claiming that a Tiefling is not an "Aligned Outsider" but a Human is an "Aligned Creature"?

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Artoo wrote:
LazarX wrote:
Serum wrote:
You realize that this would mean that barely anything but outsiders would ping for a caster using detect spells, right? Dragons, undead, humanoids, magical beasts, aberrations, etc.: It is rare for any of them to have alignment subtypes. There isn't a section in the table that covers so-called "Un-aligned" creatures.

That's correct and intentional. The 4th level neutral evil baker who does nothing but think nasty thoughts while he serves his customers will not ping.

The 1st level Lawful Evil Cleric of Asmodeus WILL ping because of his aura of evil, as will the Anti-Paladin he's currently trying to screw over to a binding contract.

The 5th level neutral evil Fighter will ping as he's become quite established in his alignment and his deeds carry more significance in the big picture.

The Paladin who just came from exploring a Thassilonian ruin, also pings because he picked up a Lissalan artifact that he has no clue about because it did not activate it's aura until he claimed posession.

A red dragon that's not a hatchling will almost always ping as it's hit dice will be 5 or greater.

What is your basis for claiming that a Tiefling is not an "Aligned Outsider" but a Human is an "Aligned Creature"?

I made no such claim. I'm just going over the guidelines of the Detect Evil spell. A Tiefling is not an aligned outsider because it is Native to the Prime Material plane.


LazarX wrote:
Artoo wrote:


What is your basis for claiming that a Tiefling is not an "Aligned Outsider" but a Human is an "Aligned Creature"?
I made no such claim. I'm just going over the guidelines of the Detect Evil spell. A Tiefling is not an aligned outsider because it is Native to the Prime Material plane.

There are no rules in the Detect Evil spell for anything that doesn't fall into one of the following categories:


  • Aligned creature
  • Aligned Undead
  • Aligned outsider
  • Cleric or paladin of an aligned deity
  • Aligned magic item or spell

You said:

LazarX wrote:


The 5th level neutral evil Fighter will ping as he's become quite established in his alignment and his deeds carry more significance in the big picture.

So either you're saying that Fighter(who, yes I assumed is human but pick a race), is an "Aligned Creature" or he falls into one of those other categories, I can't imagine which one. Please clarify how he shows up as evil.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Artoo wrote:


So either you're saying that Fighter(who, yes I assumed is human but pick a race), is an "Aligned Creature" or he falls into one of those other categories, I can't imagine which one. Please clarify how he shows up as evil.

Actually both the netural tiefling and the fighter are aligned creatures. My earlier statement was in error.

The first level tiefling doesn't detect no matter what his alignment is, UNLESS he is a cleric or anti-paladin. He remains in the left most column of "NONE".

The fifth level fighter detects because he is both evil AND 5th level which puts him into the second from left column. From "NONE" to "FAINT". His evil clerical partner of the same level radiates as "strong" no matter what his race is.


Interesting, so my LG Paladin Tiefling pings as Lawful and Good at 1st level, not just Good. :)


LazarX wrote:
Artoo wrote:


So either you're saying that Fighter(who, yes I assumed is human but pick a race), is an "Aligned Creature" or he falls into one of those other categories, I can't imagine which one. Please clarify how he shows up as evil.

Actually both the netural tiefling and the fighter are aligned creatures. My earlier statement was in error.

The first level tiefling doesn't detect no matter what his alignment is, UNLESS he is a cleric or anti-paladin. He remains in the left most column of "NONE".

The fifth level fighter detects because he is both evil AND 5th level which puts him into the second from left column. From "NONE" to "FAINT". His evil clerical partner of the same level radiates as "strong" no matter what his race is.

Why is the Tiefling an Aligned Creature but not an Aligned Outsider? Provide a rules quote, please. You seem to be assuming that "Aligned X" means something different depending on what X is and providing no reason for it.


1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.

It boils down to this:

Does the Aligned Outsider mean Alignment subtype or any Alignment? The rules are just flat out not clear but considering that Alignment subtype is also an aura, and it has the same aura categories as Cleric (with the exception of 'or lower') I would think that it is subtype rather than just alignment.

Summary: my interpretation is Aligned Outsider really means Outsider with an alignment subtype.

- Gauss


Gauss wrote:

It boils down to this:

Does the Aligned Outsider mean Alignment subtype or any Alignment? The rules are just flat out not clear but considering that Alignment subtype is also an aura, and it has the same aura categories as Cleric (with the exception of 'or lower') I would think that it is subtype rather than just alignment.

Summary: my interpretation is Aligned Outsider really means Outsider with an alignment subtype.

- Gauss

Bolding mine. What are you basing that claim on? I see nothing in Detect Evil that mentions alignment subtypes.


Hmmm, maybe I am remembering something from a previous edition. Still, I have always understood aligned outsider to be synonymous with the alignment subtype of an outsider.

- Gauss


Gauss wrote:

Hmmm, maybe I am remembering something from a previous edition. Still, I have always understood aligned outsider to be synonymous with the alignment subtype of an outsider.

- Gauss

Do you also have the same understanding of Aligned Creature and Aligned Undead? If not, why not?

Silver Crusade

OP wrote:

Does a 1HD (evil) tiefling register to a paladin's detect evil? Detect evil normally doesn't work on low-HD people, unless clerics, antipaladins, undead, and outsiders. Tieflings are outsiders, but they are native outsiders. Does this affect DE?

EDIT: Should be noted, a non-evil tiefling wouldn't ever detect. It comes from their actual alignment, not their heritage. So it seems to me it should work as it does with anybody else.

A 1HD evil Tiefling would ping. According to Detect Evil's chart, as an Aligned Outsider would have a Faint Evil Aura. Of course, so would a 1HD evil Aasimar. Tiefling are Outsiders. The Native subtype only allows them to be raised, reincarnated, or resurrected and specifically notes unlike true outsiders, native outsiders need to eat and sleep.

IF it was a good 1HD Outsider but was subtype(Evil) it would still ping, because of the drawback as quoted above by Gauss.

But now I'm thinking a Chaotic Evil Angel - Outsider(Good) that is not a cleric or anti-paladin would make one hell of a BBEG. Sending some poor group of mid-level adventurers on 'quests' until they find out he's actually evil, since Detect Evil would register him as good every single time.


Booksy wrote:


But now I'm thinking a Chaotic Evil Angel - Outsider(Good) that is not a cleric or anti-paladin would make one hell of a BBEG. Sending some poor group of mid-level adventurers on 'quests' until they find out he's actually evil, since Detect Evil would register him as good every single time.

Nope. Detect Evil would detect him as Evil every single time. Detect Good would detect him as Good every single time, and Detect Chaos would detect him as Chaotic every single time.

To make this work, you'd have to have to grab an outsider with the [Law] and [Good] subtypes (I think there are a few, would have to check), and then make him a Chaotic Evil fallen angel.

Now, then you have him approach a group with a Paladin and wave a white flag and say 'Please do not attack, I am in need of your assistance'. He then goes on to tell them he is an angel who has been trapped on the mortal plane by a very evil creature (actually a good creature, or an actual evil one he wants to supplant). This creature has used a major artifact to curse him (if it's a good creature he wants harmed, the creature has 'off-shifted' his CE alignment onto the angel, and he can't go home due to the wards, and his fellows see him as fallen. If it's a CE creature, the creature is tormenting him by forcing these alignment auras on him to keep him isolated from heaven). Make sure he has a REALLY good bluff, and roll the checks ahead of time so they don't see you rolling when they roll a sense motive.

Now you've got the perfect setup, and the PCs should even argue for the fallen angel, advocating for him with others that he's cursed. :)


Outsider (Native) is affected by spells that affect Outsiders, regardless of alignment. By this logic, a 1st level Tiefling should give off a faint aura, whether good, evil, law, or chaos. A non-aligned anything would be of True Neutral.

Silver Crusade

Avianfoo wrote:
Disagree. There is a difference between an Evil subtype (which effectively can't be non-evil alignment)

Someone with an Evil subtype can actually have a non-evil alignment. They will simply detect as evil even when they're not.

(risen fiends and fallen angels and all that)

edit-Damn, already beated to the punch and rather throroughly.

Shadow Lodge

Craig Frankum wrote:
Outsider (Native) is affected by spells that affect Outsiders, regardless of alignment. By this logic, a 1st level Tiefling should give off a faint aura, whether good, evil, law, or chaos. A non-aligned anything would be of True Neutral.

The question, though, is what do they mean by "Aligned Outsider." If they mean "alignment subtype," then a Tiefling/Aasimar would detect the same way as a humanoid. If they mean "outsider with alignment" then you are correct. Unfortunately, there is actually nothing to indicate which is what they meant. I believe in 3.5 (PF's predecessor), it actually did mean alignment subtype. For PF, that's neither here nor there, I suppose, but that is a valid interpretation until we are told otherwise.

Edit: I just checked the 3.5 Players Handbook, and it appears that I am wrong. It says an Evil Outsider, not an Outsider with the Evil Subtype, with 12 HD pings as Overwhelming Evil. I'm slightly more inclined to believe Aligned Outsider indicates Outsider with alignment. That said, a clarification would still be nice. I'm still of the opinion that it means Alignment subtype, but I can see more validity toward the alternative.


Artoo, Im not sure what you mean regarding Aligned Creatures and Undead.

My point was only to deal with Outsiders and alignment subtypes. Regardless of whether or not they have a powerful aura like Clerics do I still believe that alignment subtypes are what "Aligned Outsider" is referencing.

Just about everything that puts alignment+outsider together without specifying subtype or regular alignment causes this debate, not just Detect Evil.

- Gauss


People are really overthinking this... how can you say that an aligned creature = a creature with an alignment but in the same breath claim that an aligned outsider is not an outsider with an alignment? There is no way you can claim that a Tiefling would count as an aligned creature because the supertext 1 right after that entry states Except for undead and outsider, which have their own entry in the table.

A 1 HD Tiefling that is evil will register with a faint aura. The table makes no mention of detecting the creature's alignment subtype whatsoever. The rule that creatures with an alignment subtype always register as that alignment is a rule in the bestiary. This spell operates independently of that rule as well as any rules that may be created in the future that reference alignment subtypes. It is the bestiary rules that make the spell ping off evil subtypes, not the rules of the Detect Evil spell itself.

Aligned Creature = Creature with an alignment
Aligned Undead = Undead with an alignment
Aligned Outsider = Outsider with an alignment

Where does one see the reference to alignment subtypes in the above table? If "Aligned Outsider" requires the outsider to have the evil subtype to register, then "Aligned Creature" should require the creature to have an alignment subtype in order to register as well.


Gauss wrote:

Artoo, Im not sure what you mean regarding Aligned Creatures and Undead.

My point was only to deal with Outsiders and alignment subtypes. Regardless of whether or not they have a powerful aura like Clerics do I still believe that alignment subtypes are what "Aligned Outsider" is referencing.

Just about everything that puts alignment+outsider together without specifying subtype or regular alignment causes this debate, not just Detect Evil.

- Gauss

Robert Matthews is essentially making the point I was trying to get across directly above me here.

"Aligned Outsider" is a term used in the Detect Evil spell. "Aligned Creature" and "Aligned Undead" are also used there in the same context.

If you interpret "Aligned Outsider" as used in Detect Evil to mean "Outsider with an alignment subtype" do you also interpret "Aligned Creature" as used in Detect Evil to mean "Creature with an alignment subtype"? Same thing for "Aligned Undead".

If not, why not?

1 to 50 of 51 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Detect Evil and Tieflings All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.