
Shinigaze |
Simple question, is there any class out there that gives you the ability to take power attack as a bonus feat without meeting the prerequisites?
I decided to take the Monk of Many Styles Archetype, and to avoid the multiple ability dependency of the monk I took a 9 strength to increase my wisdom more and eventually get the guided weapon property on my Amulet of Mighty fists. Now I'm planning my character out and I was looking at getting tiger style to apply my negatives to hit from power attack to AC but I would be unable to get power attack to complement it.

![]() |

Simple question, is there any class out there that gives you the ability to take power attack as a bonus feat without meeting the prerequisites?
I decided to take the Monk of Many Styles Archetype, and to avoid the multiple ability dependency of the monk I took a -9 strength to increase my wisdom more and eventually get the guided weapon property on my Amulet of Mighty fists. Now I'm planning my character out and I was looking at getting tiger style to apply my negatives to hit from power attack to AC but I would be unable to get power attack to complement it.
Two levels of Ranger and take Two handed weapon fighting style and you can get Power attack without meeting the requirements.

Talonhawke |

Simple question, is there any class out there that gives you the ability to take power attack as a bonus feat without meeting the prerequisites?
I decided to take the Monk of Many Styles Archetype, and to avoid the multiple ability dependency of the monk I took a 9 strength to increase my wisdom more and eventually get the guided weapon property on my Amulet of Mighty fists. Now I'm planning my character out and I was looking at getting tiger style to apply my negatives to hit from power attack to AC but I would be unable to get power attack to complement it.
Can you even use Power attack with Unarmed strikes?
They are always considered light weapons which means power attack wouldn't affect them. Piranah Strike would be the way to go.

Shinigaze |
Shinigaze wrote:Simple question, is there any class out there that gives you the ability to take power attack as a bonus feat without meeting the prerequisites?
I decided to take the Monk of Many Styles Archetype, and to avoid the multiple ability dependency of the monk I took a 9 strength to increase my wisdom more and eventually get the guided weapon property on my Amulet of Mighty fists. Now I'm planning my character out and I was looking at getting tiger style to apply my negatives to hit from power attack to AC but I would be unable to get power attack to complement it.
Can you even use Power attack with Unarmed strikes?
They are always considered light weapons which means power attack wouldn't affect them. Piranah Strike would be the way to go.
There is nothing restrictive in Power Attack against using light weapons so I would say that yes you would be able to use it with Power Attack. The only reason not to use a light weapon would be because you don't fully optimize your damage but as a Monk of Many styles that is a moot issue because many of the styles I use require me to use unarmed strikes. Piranha strike seems good but the wording in the Tiger Pounce feat specifies power attack so unless there was a GM who ruled it I would think that it wouldn't qualify for the feat.

Shinigaze |
Do you have to use just your unarmed strikes though? A temple sword is a one-handed weapon, and a quarterstaff is a two-hander.
Yes, solely because I am also using Snake Style, Panther Style and Dragon Style and all of their damage specifies that I have to use unarmed strikes, so to benefit from power attack with all of my strikes I would have to use only unarmed strikes.

Novennia Narikopolus |

Piranha strike seems good but the wording in the Tiger Pounce feat specifies power attack so unless there was a GM who ruled it I would think that it wouldn't qualify for the feat.
As for that, are you concerned about meeting the pre-requisites for Tiger Pounce?
Because the Bonus Feat entry for the Master of Many Styles specifically states you don't need those prerequisites (except the Style feat itself and Elemental Fist). So you can take Tiger Pounce without actually having Power Attack. I'm pretty sure you don't have to be 8th level for it either, and can actually take it at 1st level if you're a Master of Many Styles.However, I'm not sure you can apply the attack penalty for Piranha Strike to AC with that feat, that would require some talk to the GM, but taking the feat itself isn't a problem

Novennia Narikopolus |

Oh... one thing you might want to consider however: You can use enhancement from items to qualify for feats.
So if you get a belt of +4 strength and wear it for at least 24 hours, then your 9 str is enough and you can get Power Attack and use it, as long as you wear the belt.
Yes, if it gets dispelled or you run into an area of anti-magic etc etc, it goes all away, but if you really want it, that may be a way you can go

Barry Armstrong |

Shinigaze wrote:Simple question, is there any class out there that gives you the ability to take power attack as a bonus feat without meeting the prerequisites?
I decided to take the Monk of Many Styles Archetype, and to avoid the multiple ability dependency of the monk I took a 9 strength to increase my wisdom more and eventually get the guided weapon property on my Amulet of Mighty fists. Now I'm planning my character out and I was looking at getting tiger style to apply my negatives to hit from power attack to AC but I would be unable to get power attack to complement it.
Can you even use Power attack with Unarmed strikes?
They are always considered light weapons which means power attack wouldn't affect them. Piranah Strike would be the way to go.
A monk's unarmed strike is also considered a natural weapon in addition to a light weapon, according to Core Rulebook, pg. 58. Also, see "Armed" Unarmed Attacks, pg. 182.
And, if you read the Power Attack description, it specifically mentions working with natural weapons.
I'd consider a feat as applying to the "for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve natural weapons" caveat of the monk's Unarmed Strike ability.

Shinigaze |
Shinigaze wrote:Piranha strike seems good but the wording in the Tiger Pounce feat specifies power attack so unless there was a GM who ruled it I would think that it wouldn't qualify for the feat.As for that, are you concerned about meeting the pre-requisites for Tiger Pounce?
Because the Bonus Feat entry for the Master of Many Styles specifically states you don't need those prerequisites (except the Style feat itself and Elemental Fist). So you can take Tiger Pounce without actually having Power Attack. I'm pretty sure you don't have to be 8th level for it either, and can actually take it at 1st level if you're a Master of Many Styles.However, I'm not sure you can apply the attack penalty for Piranha Strike to AC with that feat, that would require some talk to the GM, but taking the feat itself isn't a problem
Not concerned with meeting pre-requisites for Tiger Pounce, it's just that there is only a marginal benefit from Tiger Pounce if I don't have Power Attack, in my opinion if I don't have Power Attack there is no reason to get the Tiger Style feats.

Hyla |

They are always considered light weapons which means power attack wouldn't affect them.
You are mistaken in that. Unarmed strikes and light beapons get full damage boni from power attack. In fact the feat does not say anything about light weapons at all.
Only off-hand weapons and secondary natural attacks get a reduced damage bonus.

Shinigaze |
Unless your really planning on charging alot or using the other special options Dragon Style may not be for you. It won't increase the damage from Guided so keep that in mind as well.
"A character who attacks with a guided weapon modifies his attack rolls and weapon damage rolls with his Wisdom modifier, not his Strength modifier."
Dragon Ferocity gives an extra 50% strength damage to my damage rolls. I took this to mean that with the guided weapon property I would add half my wisdom to my damage rolls, is that not the case?

Novennia Narikopolus |

I don't see any mention in the book that says a monk's fist is treated as a light weapon, unless it's in Ultimate Combat, which I don't have ready access to.
I think the only reference to unarmed strike as a light weapon is in the TWF rules, where it says an unarmed strike always counts as a light weapon for purpose of calculating the offhand penalties.
However I'm pretty sure it says somewhere that you can't use a Unarmed Strike two-handed for the 1.5x str bonus. Which kinda seems logical. And since actually the only difference between light and one-handed is that you can't two-hand it, you could say US is a light weapon.
Not that it really matters, because Power Attack works just fine with light weapons.

Talonhawke |

Talonhawke wrote:Unless your really planning on charging alot or using the other special options Dragon Style may not be for you. It won't increase the damage from Guided so keep that in mind as well."A character who attacks with a guided weapon modifies his attack rolls and weapon damage rolls with his Wisdom modifier, not his Strength modifier."
Dragon Ferocity gives an extra 50% strength damage to my damage rolls. I took this to mean that with the guided weapon property I would add half my wisdom to my damage rolls, is that not the case?
Sadly now because it modifies your str now your GM may rule it will work but by the RAW it does nothing for your Wisdom.
Edit removed snarkiness should really sleep soon.

Talonhawke |

Strike, Unarmed: A Medium character deals 1d3 points of nonlethal damage with an unarmed strike. A Small character deals 1d2 points of nonlethal damage. A monk or any character with the Improved Unarmed Strike feat can deal lethal or nonlethal damage with unarmed strikes, at his discretion. The damage from an unarmed strike is considered weapon damage for the purposes of effects that give you a bonus on weapon damage rolls.
An unarmed strike is always considered a light weapon. Therefore, you can use the Weapon Finesse feat to apply your Dexterity modifier instead of your Strength modifier to attack rolls with an unarmed strike. Unarmed strikes do not count as natural weapons (see Combat).
From the CRB portion of the PRD. This is where i get that they are light weapons.

Barry Armstrong |

Barry Armstrong wrote:I don't see any mention in the book that says a monk's fist is treated as a light weapon, unless it's in Ultimate Combat, which I don't have ready access to.I think the only reference to unarmed strike as a light weapon is in the TWF rules, where it says an unarmed strike always counts as a light weapon for purpose of calculating the offhand penalties.
However I'm pretty sure it says somewhere that you can't use a Unarmed Strike two-handed for the 1.5x str bonus. Which kinda seems logical. And since actually the only difference between light and one-handed is that you can't two-hand it, you could say US is a light weapon.
Not that it really matters, because Power Attack works just fine with light weapons.
Yeah, I found the reference for unarmed attacks being light weapons. It's in the equipment section, in it's own little buried paragraph.
Core Rulebook, pg. 141, reads "An unarmed strike is always considered a light weapon." Pretty cut and dry.
However, Core Rulebook, pg. 58, reads "A monk's unarmed strike is treated as both a manufactured weapon and a natural weapon for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve either manufactured or natural weapons."
So it would seem that a monk's fist qualifies as both. Or all three.

Shinigaze |
Sadly now because it modifies your str now your GM may rule it will work but by the RAW it does nothing for your Wisdom.
Edit removed snarkiness should really sleep soon.
"While using Dragon Style, you gain a bonus on unarmed strike damage rolls equal to half you Strength bonus."
The way I read Dragon ferocity is that it changes your normal strength bonus to weapon damage rolls to 1-1/2 strength damage to weapon damage rolls, and seeing as Guided says that it modifies weapon damage rolls with his wisdom modifier, not his strength wouldn't it be 1-1/2 to wisdom now? To me the guided weapon property seems to be saying, "replace any instance of str with wis when determining to hit and damage."
Also, "A monk’s unarmed strike is treated as both a manufactured weapon and a natural weapon for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve either manufactured weapons or natural weapons." from page 58 of the core rulebook under unarmed strike for monks.
EDIT: Ninja'd on unarmed strike.

Shinigaze |
Dragon style doesn't give you 1.5x str it gives you 1x+.5x Ie if you had a 18 str you would add 4 and 2 but in your case its adding nothing since you have a negitve str mod.
Okay so one last plea to make it work, wouldn't the damage calculation work as 1d8+str+.5*str thereby letting me replace str with wis? If not I can take it, I just want it to work that way so I can do more damage.

Novennia Narikopolus |

Dragon style doesn't give you 1.5x str it gives you 1x+.5x Ie if you had a 18 str you would add 4 and 2 but in your case its adding nothing since you have a negitve str mod.
I agree.
Lets make another example.14 str (+2), 18 wis (+4)
guided weapon with dragon style gives you: +4 wis (100%) and +1 str (50%)
Thats how I understand it. In your case though it gives nothing.

Novennia Narikopolus |

Okay so one last plea to make it work,
Pleading to us doesn't change the RAW, sorry. Pleading to your GM might allow you to apply it to your Wis, after all it's not like you get it for free, you spend feats on it.
But essentially what I'm saying is: Talk to your GM, if he says yes, then you're good. If he says no, than it won't work, no matter what we say here.
Shinigaze |
Shinigaze wrote:Okay so one last plea to make it work,Pleading to us doesn't change the RAW, sorry. Pleading to your GM might allow you to apply it to your Wis, after all it's not like you get it for free, you spend feats on it.
But essentially what I'm saying is: Talk to your GM, if he says yes, then you're good. If he says no, than it won't work, no matter what we say here.
I realize that pleading with the forums isn't going to change how the rules work by RAW, what I meant was that it was one last plea to change your opinion to match mine but that seemed kind of arrogant to me so I tried to make it sound more polite.

Barry Armstrong |

So, what I'm reading here, is that you min/maxxed a monk's stats to dump strength for Wisdom, you're not happy with the damage output, and now you're trying to bend or outright break the RAW to make up for your loss? If you want Power Attack in your long-term planning, you're going to have to incorporate either 2 levels of Ranger or an item that increases your strength to 13 or above to compensate. It's that simple.

Shinigaze |
So, what I'm reading here, is that you min/maxxed a monk's stats to dump strength for Wisdom, you're not happy with the damage output, and now you're trying to bend or outright break the RAW to make up for your loss? If you want Power Attack in your long-term planning, you're going to have to incorporate either 2 levels of Ranger or an item that increases your strength to 13 or above to compensate. It's that simple.
Ok first of all, don't know if it was intended or not but you're coming off as a big douche. Secondly while yes I did min max my stats I believed a feat worked one way and found out that it didn't and so I agreed that, while not in these exact words, if I couldn't convince other people that it did work my way then I would accept theirs as RAW and work with it. I never tried to break any RAW. Also, The question about Power Attack was answered by about the 4th post and the fact that you are bringing it up now that we are discussing the wording for the Dragon Ferocity feat makes absolutely no sense. I don't understand why you are bringing such hostility into this when I have been nothing but polite but you should really watch that in the future.

Shinigaze |
Can't you just change your stats or has the game already started?
The game has already started, plus I don't think I would change my stats even if my GM would let me. I'm only playing the monk because it's a class I have never really played before so I wanted to try something new. I had heard that the monk class sucks because of the fact that it is dependent on 4 of the 6 ability scores to be viable and so this is just my experiment to see what I can do to make the monk not suck. Personally I am having a blast playing him and I came on to discuss some ways of planning out my levels because at the moment I am only level 7 and I am focusing on combat because the other party members have the other roles covered.

Barry Armstrong |

Barry Armstrong wrote:So, what I'm reading here, is that you min/maxxed a monk's stats to dump strength for Wisdom, you're not happy with the damage output, and now you're trying to bend or outright break the RAW to make up for your loss? If you want Power Attack in your long-term planning, you're going to have to incorporate either 2 levels of Ranger or an item that increases your strength to 13 or above to compensate. It's that simple.Ok first of all, don't know if it was intended or not but you're coming off as a big douche. Secondly while yes I did min max my stats I believed a feat worked one way and found out that it didn't and so I agreed that, while not in these exact words, if I couldn't convince other people that it did work my way then I would accept theirs as RAW and work with it. I never tried to break any RAW. Also, The question about Power Attack was answered by about the 4th post and the fact that you are bringing it up now that we are discussing the wording for the Dragon Ferocity feat makes absolutely no sense. I don't understand why you are bringing such hostility into this when I have been nothing but polite but you should really watch that in the future.
No hostility intended. That was meant to be read in a completely neutral tone. That's the problem with electronic communication, one person can read it as douchebaggery while it was intended to be a neutral observation. I apologize if it came off as offensive. Re-reading it, I can see how it can be taken that way. There was no sarcasm intended.
I hadn't gotten to the Dragon Ferocity feat part, but I have no experience with it, so I have no input on it. Good luck with your build.

Shinigaze |
Shinigaze wrote:Barry Armstrong wrote:So, what I'm reading here, is that you min/maxxed a monk's stats to dump strength for Wisdom, you're not happy with the damage output, and now you're trying to bend or outright break the RAW to make up for your loss? If you want Power Attack in your long-term planning, you're going to have to incorporate either 2 levels of Ranger or an item that increases your strength to 13 or above to compensate. It's that simple.Ok first of all, don't know if it was intended or not but you're coming off as a big douche. Secondly while yes I did min max my stats I believed a feat worked one way and found out that it didn't and so I agreed that, while not in these exact words, if I couldn't convince other people that it did work my way then I would accept theirs as RAW and work with it. I never tried to break any RAW. Also, The question about Power Attack was answered by about the 4th post and the fact that you are bringing it up now that we are discussing the wording for the Dragon Ferocity feat makes absolutely no sense. I don't understand why you are bringing such hostility into this when I have been nothing but polite but you should really watch that in the future.No hostility intended. That was meant to be read in a completely neutral tone. That's the problem with electronic communication, one person can read it as douchebaggery while it was intended to be a neutral observation. I apologize if it came off as offensive. Re-reading it, I can see how it can be taken that way. There was no sarcasm intended.
I hadn't gotten to the Dragon Ferocity feat part, but I have no experience with it, so I have no input on it. Good luck with your build.
Well then, I apologize as well for my response as it was hostile in response. Hope I didn't offend you too much.

Jen the GM |

Actually, solution!
Step 1: Take one level of Synthesist Summoner
Step 2: Get Quad form
Step 3: Get pounce evolution + ability score boost if you can (Now you can flurry all the time!)
Step 4: Your dumped physical scores are now replaced by the Eidolon
Step 5: Get power attack (which you now qualify for)
Step 6:???
Step 7: Profit!

Barry Armstrong |

Barry Armstrong wrote:Well then, I apologize as well for my response as it was hostile in response. Hope I didn't offend you too much.Shinigaze wrote:Barry Armstrong wrote:So, what I'm reading here, is that you min/maxxed a monk's stats to dump strength for Wisdom, you're not happy with the damage output, and now you're trying to bend or outright break the RAW to make up for your loss? If you want Power Attack in your long-term planning, you're going to have to incorporate either 2 levels of Ranger or an item that increases your strength to 13 or above to compensate. It's that simple.Ok first of all, don't know if it was intended or not but you're coming off as a big douche. Secondly while yes I did min max my stats I believed a feat worked one way and found out that it didn't and so I agreed that, while not in these exact words, if I couldn't convince other people that it did work my way then I would accept theirs as RAW and work with it. I never tried to break any RAW. Also, The question about Power Attack was answered by about the 4th post and the fact that you are bringing it up now that we are discussing the wording for the Dragon Ferocity feat makes absolutely no sense. I don't understand why you are bringing such hostility into this when I have been nothing but polite but you should really watch that in the future.No hostility intended. That was meant to be read in a completely neutral tone. That's the problem with electronic communication, one person can read it as douchebaggery while it was intended to be a neutral observation. I apologize if it came off as offensive. Re-reading it, I can see how it can be taken that way. There was no sarcasm intended.
I hadn't gotten to the Dragon Ferocity feat part, but I have no experience with it, so I have no input on it. Good luck with your build.
You didn't offend me at all. I usually get pretty heated in monk ability debates, because of the general (and incorrect) assumption that just because a monk's raw DPS is sub-optimal, that they are a useless class in combat. Getting around that using things like Vow of Poverty (why yes, my AC is indeed 42 without any armor, clothing, or spellcasting involved. What?!?)and feats such as Ring the Golden Bell (why yes, I did just break your jaw from 8 squares away. What?!?) are favorite things of mine to bring monks back to the fighting arena.

Shinigaze |
You didn't offend me at all. I usually get pretty heated in monk ability debates, because of the general (and incorrect)...
Yeah, that's what I am trying to do with the many styles archetype, by fusing multiple styles together I am going for a kind of retaliatory mindset. "Oh you want to attack me because I provoked an AoO by moving through your threatened square? Well let me use panther style to hit you first. Oh you want to hit me now? Well snake style lets me use my sense motive check as my AC, *roll* 15, plus my 17 that makes my AC 32. Oh you missed? Well let me use snake style to hit you 2 more times, all the while using other styles to add damage to each hit i get on you."
Also, in response to Jen the GM, would that actually work? Because wouldn't the ability scores be considered temporary and not let you qualify? Like in the case of the belt of giants strength, after 24 hours it changes from temporary to permanent.

Jen the GM |

I asked the very same question when I thought of it, and the answer is, they can be permanent.
Just stay awake for more than 24 hours for one day and bam, permanent. Take the feat, and then every time that your Eidolon is up (which should be always when you are not sleeping), power attack.
Once, I was trying to prove a point with a monk. At level 6, it seems that with various feats, it can take on two standard fighters of the same level (big greatsword wielding freaks) at once. It's done mainly by utterly dumping physical ability scores (except con) and buffing wisdom to highs.
Combine with the feat whose name escapes me, allowing you to use (reading liberally) your entire attack as touch attacks, with the first being a stunning fist, while pouncing all the time.

Shinigaze |
I asked the very same question when I thought of it, and the answer is, they can be permanent.
Just stay awake for more than 24 hours for one day and bam, permanent. Take the feat, and then every time that your Eidolon is up (which should be always when you are not sleeping), power attack.
Once, I was trying to prove a point with a monk. At level 6, it seems that with various feats, it can take on two standard fighters of the same level (big greatsword wielding freaks) at once. It's done mainly by utterly dumping physical ability scores (except con) and buffing wisdom to highs.
Combine with the feat whose name escapes me, allowing you to use (reading liberally) your entire attack as touch attacks, with the first being a stunning fist, while pouncing all the time.
Well cool, that has the potential to be very good! Although I'll have to run it by my GM to see if he would be ok with it, he might dislike it because he has this problem with us making our characters too good.

![]() |
I asked the very same question when I thought of it, and the answer is, they can be permanent.
Just stay awake for more than 24 hours for one day and bam, permanent. Take the feat, and then every time that your Eidolon is up (which should be always when you are not sleeping), power attack.
Once, I was trying to prove a point with a monk. At level 6, it seems that with various feats, it can take on two standard fighters of the same level (big greatsword wielding freaks) at once. It's done mainly by utterly dumping physical ability scores (except con) and buffing wisdom to highs.
Combine with the feat whose name escapes me, allowing you to use (reading liberally) your entire attack as touch attacks, with the first being a stunning fist, while pouncing all the time.
I'd love to know where there is a feat that allows all attacks to be made as touch attacks. (Not that any sane DM would allow that.) Also, how is the monk getting pounce at level 6?

![]() |
I had heard that the monk class sucks because of the fact that it is dependent on 4 of the 6 ability scores to be viable and so this is just my experiment to see what I can do to make the monk not suck.
This is a major reason why I steer new players away from messageboards like this one. Dogmatism like this puts preconceptions, makes people afraid to try anything other than the "optimal" way of doing things.
Fact is... monks don't suck as long as the player doesn't suck.

Shinigaze |
An Unarmed Fighter can get a Style feat as a freebie, without qualifying for it. Are you certain you even need Power Attack then?
Taking power attack is only so that I could get the benefit of the Tiger pounce feat, which allows me to take the negatives to hit from power attack and apply it to my AC instead.

![]() |
Okay, I was mistaken. There is an "a" in the thing that probably makes that position untenable. But still, touch attack stunning fist:
http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/ki-diversity-combat-faction
Pounce is from the Eidolon's evolution.
So to prove monks are great all you had to do was misread a feat and use a class other than monks. Gotcha!