What's The Problem With Pathfinder!?!?!


Off-Topic Discussions

101 to 125 of 125 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Ghost page! HUZZAH!

RPG Superstar 2012

Can we call it Hero System Pth Edition? Or PathfinD&Der?

Dark Archive

Anything but Hero please, my supercomputer just broke.


Hero FTW!!!!!+1!!!!!
The resh of the games are shtupid.

Dark Archive

You look like my uncle.


Pony Stalker wrote:
You look like my uncle.

Sho your uncle looks like Brad Pitt?

Dark Archive

Armchair DM wrote:
Pony Stalker wrote:
You look like my uncle.
Sho your uncle looks like Brad Pitt?

No my uncle likes to sneek in my room at night and watch me sleep.


Pony Stalker wrote:
Armchair DM wrote:
Pony Stalker wrote:
You look like my uncle.
Sho your uncle looks like Brad Pitt?
No my uncle likes to sneek in my room at night and watch me sleep.

Woah. This just got too creepy even for me.


Pony Stalker wrote:
Armchair DM wrote:
Pony Stalker wrote:
You look like my uncle.
Sho your uncle looks like Brad Pitt?
No my uncle likes to sneek in my room at night and watch me sleep.

Is he a sparkly vampire too?


Eekster Buhnay wrote:
William Shakespeare wrote:
I AM Shakespeare!
No, I am Shakespeare!

No, I´m Shakespeare, and my wife also is Shakespeare.


Armchair DM wrote:

Hero FTW!!!!!+1!!!!!

The resh of the games are shtupid.

A self repsecting Hero GM would never refer to himself as a DM. Just FYI.


Stebehil wrote:
Eekster Buhnay wrote:
William Shakespeare wrote:
I AM Shakespeare!
No, I am Shakespeare!

No, I´m Shakespeare, and my wife also is Shakespeare.

I am shaking a spear!! *shakes... then chucks it at the poor sucker still flying into and out of the bottomless pit*


CourtFool wrote:
Armchair DM wrote:

Hero FTW!!!!!+1!!!!!

The resh of the games are shtupid.
A self repsecting Hero GM would never refer to himself as a DM. Just FYI.

You're full of failshauce. I can shay it however I want to.

The Exchange

CourtFool wrote:
Armchair DM wrote:

Hero FTW!!!!!+1!!!!!

The resh of the games are shtupid.
A self repsecting Hero GM would never refer to himself as a DM. Just FYI.

We call ourselves Referees. TYVM


I call you dull.

The Exchange

Angry Fanboy wrote:
I call you dull.

well if that is the worst I get called on this board I am doing alright.

*does Gopher dance*


Crimson Jester wrote:
Angry Fanboy wrote:
I call you dull.

well if that is the worst I get called on this board I am doing alright.

*does Gopher dance*

It's spreading. Soon, the boards will be full of gopher dancing.

Liberty's Edge Contributor, RPG Superstar 2012

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Angry Fanboy wrote:
I call you dull.

well if that is the worst I get called on this board I am doing alright.

*does Gopher dance*

It's spreading. Soon, the boards will be full of gopher dancing.

Awww, I hoped in honor of the season we could do the Snoopy dance.


I love the snoppy dance too! It's like you're a member of my dance crew, and we were separated at birth!

The Exchange

Snoopy dance!


Tiny Tina wrote:
Why do some people insist on calling Pathfinder things like 3.P, 3.75, THE REAL D&D or anything other than Pathfinder? Is Pathfinder that much of a mouthful? I mean I'm blonde and I can say it, come on people.

Because Pathfinder reminds me of a vehicle.


Tiny Tina wrote:
Why do some people insist on calling Pathfinder things like 3.P, 3.75, THE REAL D&D or anything other than Pathfinder? Is Pathfinder that much of a mouthful? I mean I'm blonde and I can say it, come on people.

As an organizer of events, I can tell you for a fact, that if you call it "3.75" that it allows hardcore 3.5 players and DMs to loosen up. There are a lot of people who stubbornly don't want to leave 3.5 because they hated 4th edition so much, and I can't blame them. I'm not going to bad-mouth fourth edition, but I gave it the old college try and it isn't for me. It adds credibility to the system (pathfinder) that paizo published Dragon and Dungeon magazines.

Recently we changed our meetup name from the North Houston Dungeons & Dragons Experience to the North Houston Dungeons & Dragons / Pathfinder Experience because we finally had enough members convert to pathfinder.

The one small wording that got them to give pathfinder games a shot? Calling it 3.75 and informing them it's 3.5 backward compatible. They read the rulebook and realize that it was rooted in 3.5, but it is a far better and more balanced system.

So that's just my take. I'm well aware that it's a different system, and I refer to it as pathfinder often. I wasn't necessarily disagreeing with the proble, of lumping it wth 3.5, but I wanted to provide a seperate perspective.


Gak! To hell with edition interpretations. I'll wait; I hear version 4.69 is going to be a LARP release.

101 to 125 of 125 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / What's The Problem With Pathfinder!?!?! All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.