
farewell2kings |

No, it leaves a LOT to be covered. Those LGG write-ups were skeletal to say the least and had NOTHING in the way of stats, smart guy.
Well, okay...was trying to be more helpful than smart (okay, I was a little smart-ass, but I did spend a couple of minutes typing up that list) by giving you the list in case you weren't familiar with the LGG. Your post wasn't clear what you wanted or what you already had.
Have you checked some of those Greyhawk online resources? There's a bunch of additionally detailed stuff out there, I've found, if you look hard enough....this is assuming that the article you're asking for doesn't appear in this compendium.

the black knight |
I have all the old dragon articles on the Suloise + Greyhawk deities but I would love to have that list updated and statted out for the current edition. You're right when you say there is stuff out there, but you gotta do a lotta leg work just to find it: Iuz was in an issue of Dragon, as was Tharizdun and Rao; Deities and Demi-gods had a bunch of these guys, also statted out; but nowhere may be found a definitive issue of Greyhawk deitiews in detail. One has to settle for the LGG, which only goes so far, but it is more complete than others. I suppose this all goes back to the jealousy Greyhawk fans feel when they see other settings getting the red carpet treatment.

Rick Bligh |

Is there a place where we can view, or at least get a preview of the list of articles?
Rick Bligh: There's a Faerie Dragon in the Draconomicon.
Yes, I was aware of that, thank you. Problem with that write-up was that the authors of the Draconomicon treated it like a Psuedo-Dragon and not as a true dragon as was the case in the original article. The Faerie Dragon was stripped of age levels, spell casting levels and reduced to a CR 6 lizard. This was probably due to the unfortunate remark at the beginning of the original article attributing common ancestry with the Psuedo-dragon. The reduction in stature was more than likely due to its diminutive size. An unfortunate bit of prejudice to be sure.
I'm hoping for a more favorable write-up matching the original.
Rick

![]() |

We're getting very, very close to posting a table of contents. We're still trying to fit everything into our pagination, so I don't want to announce something that might actually end up falling out of the book at the last minute.
Good Hits and Bad Misses will be in there, as will the belove Chi-Square Test. Another one someone mentioned upthread is the Toxins of Cerilon, which will appear in the book as well.
A few much-requested articles will not appear in the book, mostly for reasons of space. We didn't have room for Ed Greenwood's brilliant Nine Hells articles, for example, since they would have taken up about a fifth of the page count of this volume, which seemed sub-optimal. I have instead set them aside to serve as the cornerstone of a future volume, which (if WotC approves it and the first one sells well) will focus exclusively on the Planes of D&D.
There are also a lot of "Oriental Adventures" articles that could make their own volume later on, and hence they are not included in this inaugural book.
Likewise, I have compiled folders full of all of the Greyhawk and Forgotten Realms articles ever published by the magazine, and it is my hope that these too may form the basis of their own volumes (whereas this first is aimed at the most general audience possible).
Even without Len Lakofka's Suel Pantheon or Ed Greenwood's Nine Hells articles, I am sure fans of the magazine will find a lot to like in this first volume, and a lot to look forward to in future installments of what we hope will become a long series.
Just because something does not appear in Volume 1 does not mean we have no intention of compiling it in the future.
--Erik Mona
Editor-in-Chief
Dragon & Dungeon

BOZ |

excellent. :)
i was hoping to see the devil lords in this book, but when you think about it, the three articles were each fairly long, and with the way stats (and in particular, stats for powerful unique outsiders) have expanded, i can understand why you would want to use the space on something else. :)
if you do get to do an "all-planes" book, that would be cool. you could even use that to accompany the much-requested "print all the demon lords in one book!" :)

abarel |
I was wondering if the article about the Elven Spirit Bow was going to be in the compilation. A friend was telling me about it and showed me something that said it did 1d20 points of damage but had a special effect or something but he didn't know what that was. Just wondering because I play alot of elven archers and that would be a nice bow without any special traits.

Robert Head |

Sgt. Kenku wrote:I do hope that the cover of the book will be cooler looking. There's a awfully lot of negative space.Yeah, for my favorite release of the year, it's certainly NOT my favorite cover.
The new potentially-final cover is now up.
- rob
PS Negative space is your friend!

FlameLover |

Sorry to say it but i much prefer the old cover. It now looks like a 2nd edition supplement or something but before it looked very clean and proffesional (almost like a diary). The previous one made it almost feel like a personal scrapbook, and it was wicked because of that. Now it's going for that kitch/retro look and i personally do not like it as much now. But i'll still buy it anyway :)

RavinRay |

First of all, I am SO looking forward to this. I have precious few back issues (all of them 3.5e).
At least some people are happy that the missing chromatics are coming out; that reminds me of publisher Keith Strohm's Children of Bahamut and Spawn of Tiamat article with those six unique dragons. They've been converted at EN World and elsewhere, but I hope Paizo's own conversion will appear in succeeding compendia.

Pathos |

Even without Len Lakofka's Suel Pantheon or Ed Greenwood's Nine Hells articles, I am sure fans of the magazine will find a lot to like in this first volume, and a lot to look forward to in future installments of what we hope will become a long series.
Just because something does not appear in Volume 1 does not mean we have no intention of compiling it in the future.
--Erik Mona
Editor-in-Chief
Dragon & Dungeon
Oh Well, perhaps next time. So concider this my vote for BoVD or Greyhawk style compendium to be done next. :o)

Amaril |

Likewise, I have compiled folders full of all of the Greyhawk and Forgotten Realms articles ever published by the magazine, and it is my hope that these too may form the basis of their own volumes (whereas this first is aimed at the most general audience possible).
Please, Erik, if the success of Volume I is as you hope it to be, release the Greyhawk compilation next. I think you understand as much as any other Greyhawk fanatic that this is desired more than anything else.
On a related question, do the Dragon Compendiums include 3e/v3.5 material as well as pre-3e articles?

Koldoon |

Sgt. Kenku wrote:Is there a place where we can view, or at least get a preview of the list of articles?
Rick Bligh: There's a Faerie Dragon in the Draconomicon.
Yes, I was aware of that, thank you. Problem with that write-up was that the authors of the Draconomicon treated it like a Psuedo-Dragon and not as a true dragon as was the case in the original article. The Faerie Dragon was stripped of age levels, spell casting levels and reduced to a CR 6 lizard. This was probably due to the unfortunate remark at the beginning of the original article attributing common ancestry with the Psuedo-dragon. The reduction in stature was more than likely due to its diminutive size. An unfortunate bit of prejudice to be sure.
I'm hoping for a more favorable write-up matching the original.
Rick
I agree completely... so much so that I pitched it to the Dragon staff as a feature. Sadly, I had no luck.
- Ashavan

Swiftbrook |

A few much-requested articles will not appear in the book, mostly for reasons of space. --- snip
Likewise, I have compiled folders full of all of the Greyhawk and Forgotten Realms articles ever published by the magazine, and it is my hope that these too may form the basis of their own volumes (whereas this first is aimed at the most general audience possible).
--Erik Mona
Editor-in-Chief
Dragon & Dungeon
Ouch! .... I was looking forward to the old Greyhawk material. I don't have many Dragon mags. Guess I'll have to wait a few more years .....
-Swiftbrook
Just My Thoughts

![]() |
Likewise, I have compiled folders full of all of the Greyhawk and Forgotten Realms articles ever published by the magazine, and it is my hope that these too may form the basis of their own volumes (whereas this first is aimed at the most general audience possible).
Any chance we will see any of the Dragonlance articles in a volume of their own? I personally would like to see some of the Fifth Age stuff retooled for 3.5

cannon fodder |

A few much-requested articles will not appear in the book, mostly for reasons of space. We didn't have room for Ed Greenwood's brilliant Nine Hells articles, for example, since they would have taken up about a fifth of the page count of this volume, which seemed sub-optimal. I have instead set them aside to serve as the cornerstone of a future volume, which (if WotC approves it and the first one sells well) will focus exclusively on the Planes of D&D.--Erik Mona
Editor-in-Chief
Dragon & Dungeon
Oooooh planar stuff, that's duuuuuuuuurty!! I'm giddy as a schoolgirl!!
So Erik, if the book's coming out on Oct. 31, and let's say it sells very well, how soon would we see volume two? Next Spring? Summer? A year?

![]() |

I'd like to purchase this book (and future volumes), but I have just gone through the process of filling in the online form and the price had a $20 (£11) uplift for postage which is a large hike on a $40 (£23) product.
This is probably because I live in England and is, therefore, completely understandable. Before I place an order then, can you say please whether Paizo will be selling the book through UK outlets such as Amazon UK or Place for Games?
(The latter is the excellent outlet for UK subscribers to the main magazines).
Jason