Player Companions: What's Next?


Pathfinder Player Companion

251 to 300 of 361 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next > last >>

Jurgen Dark wrote:

Maybe a 'lord of the realms' companion. Designed to support the various roles a PC can take in a Kingdom (from Ultimate Campaign). The support could include setting specific support inspired by various locales. I'm thinking the book could flesh out ways to differentiate between a spymaster in Galt and Cheliax (for example). Maybe a better name could be 'Lords of Golarion'?

I would also like to see 'Rulers of the Inner Sea' giving setting specific details about these roles for various countries around Avistan, but that may belong in another thread.

"Rulers of the Inner Sea" has potentials both as a Player Companion and as a Campaign Setting book.


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

How about "Heroes of the Ages", with reference to player characters who are not young adult humans (whether they are younger or much older). You could include archetypes and feats for very old and very young characters, add an essay on what it is like for an elf to take a century to grow up, and clean up the Advanced Race Guide aging tables right away rather than wait for a new print run that may never happen.


I'll drop this here.

After five booklets on templates-turned-weaker-PC-races (celestials/aasimars, fiends/tieflings, vampires/dhampirs, lycanthropes/skinwalkers, elementals/oreads, sylphs, undines and ifrits), how about addressing THE most requested PC race?

Beside, it's not like you cannot make a Dragonborn similar to WotC's now can't you...?


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

They can adress those dragonborns right after the kitsune expansion ;)

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
JiCi wrote:

I'll drop this here.

After five booklets on templates-turned-weaker-PC-races (celestials/aasimars, fiends/tieflings, vampires/dhampirs, lycanthropes/skinwalkers, elementals/oreads, sylphs, undines and ifrits), how about addressing THE most requested PC race?

Beside, it's not like you cannot make a Dragonborn similar to WotC's now can't you...?

I wouldn't exactly call a post with 3 favorites over 4 months an indication of THE most requested PC race ;-)

Silver Crusade

Gorbacz wrote:
JiCi wrote:

I'll drop this here.

After five booklets on templates-turned-weaker-PC-races (celestials/aasimars, fiends/tieflings, vampires/dhampirs, lycanthropes/skinwalkers, elementals/oreads, sylphs, undines and ifrits), how about addressing THE most requested PC race?

Beside, it's not like you cannot make a Dragonborn similar to WotC's now can't you...?

I wouldn't exactly call a post with 3 favorites over 4 months an indication of THE most requested PC race ;-)

I agree and honestly the whole dragonborn thing is done to death. I think that the most requested would be for kitsune. I still think that they could manage a Blood of Beasts book. (Catfolk, Ratfolk, Tengu, Grippli, Kitsune, Nagaji, Vanara)


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

I'd vote for trimming the line back to bi-monthly. There was definitely a lot of important concepts that were getting delayed previously, but I'd much prefer fewer companions with more thought put into the concept.


mswbear wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
JiCi wrote:

I'll drop this here.

After five booklets on templates-turned-weaker-PC-races (celestials/aasimars, fiends/tieflings, vampires/dhampirs, lycanthropes/skinwalkers, elementals/oreads, sylphs, undines and ifrits), how about addressing THE most requested PC race?

Beside, it's not like you cannot make a Dragonborn similar to WotC's now can't you...?

I wouldn't exactly call a post with 3 favorites over 4 months an indication of THE most requested PC race ;-)
I agree and honestly the whole dragonborn thing is done to death. I think that the most requested would be for kitsune. I still think that they could manage a Blood of Beasts book. (Catfolk, Ratfolk, Tengu, Grippli, Kitsune, Nagaji, Vanara)

I would love having more information on almost all of those races, but a player's companion book with that many races in it would almost certainly be a disaster. There simply isn't enough space in the books to do the races justice. Even four races in a single book would be pushing it.

Also: I missed all the dragon stuff in D&D since my real gaming started with pathfinder. So for me and a lot of other people dragon's *definately* have not been overdone!

Scarab Sages

I'll be frank: Make me a supplement (The Arcanist's Cookbook?) that offers Society-legal versions of...

A) A Magus Archetype that replaces Spell Combat, Improved Spell Combat, and Greater Spell Combat with something/things fit for a Magus meant to fight with 2-handed weapons (I've always wanted to play an Elven Kensei specializing in the Elven Curve Blade, as well as an ominous "dark halberdier" who backed up their halberd with a keenness for such necromantic powers as the Magus spell list offers);

and

B) some way for Sorcerers to be Intelligence-based that permits more versatility than the Sage variant Bloodline, and is not as "through-the-nose" as the Crossblooded Archetype (although it makes good enough sense for classes like Bards and Summoners, and I'd personally be inclined to say Clerics and Oracles should perhaps be reversed in this regard, the one qualm being that it push Channeling Energy beyond the pale power-wise, I felt that making Sorcerer magic Charisma-based was a mistake ever since I first opened up the 3.0 Player's Handbook - on the other hand, I love most-if-not-all of the other things Pathfinder has since done with Sorcerers; though this would not be my first choice, I could see a racial Archetype for Elven/Elf-Blooded Sorcerers that made this change and not too many others as making sense),

and I will buy it and I will play with it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Blood of the Coven, book about changelings would be great. inside should be a four page section on the different changeling heritages,
Annis, Green, Sea, Blood, Night, Storm, Winter, and maybe Mute to give an even number. Each one of them should give details on the personality and appearance of these changelings and what ability they get in their trait dependent on their mother's hag type.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Majuba wrote:
I'd vote for trimming the line back to bi-monthly. There was definitely a lot of important concepts that were getting delayed previously, but I'd much prefer fewer companions with more thought put into the concept.

I would totally support this.

I advise to refrain from a blood of beasts book though that has more than 3-4 races in it. It would be a lot better to take up the old pattern like it has been with some core races, goblins and orcs. ONE book per race, no matter the race. Meaning sylph, ifriit, etc all could get their own book.
I´m pretty sure that those would be a lot better and find a huge fanbase.
They also would not need to be on the same powerlevel as blood of angels and blood of fiends, but should still offer more interesting and unique options for several classes.
It´s no coincidence that a lot of people use certain races for certain classes, which seems rather poorly.


mswbear wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
JiCi wrote:

I'll drop this here.

After five booklets on templates-turned-weaker-PC-races (celestials/aasimars, fiends/tieflings, vampires/dhampirs, lycanthropes/skinwalkers, elementals/oreads, sylphs, undines and ifrits), how about addressing THE most requested PC race?

Beside, it's not like you cannot make a Dragonborn similar to WotC's now can't you...?

I wouldn't exactly call a post with 3 favorites over 4 months an indication of THE most requested PC race ;-)
I agree and honestly the whole dragonborn thing is done to death. I think that the most requested would be for kitsune. I still think that they could manage a Blood of Beasts book. (Catfolk, Ratfolk, Tengu, Grippli, Kitsune, Nagaji, Vanara)

1) Just because it wasn't that much "favored" doesn't mean it's not popular. Favoring a topic doesn't seem to be a common practice here.

2) I wouldn't call this being "done to death" when nothing has been done to make an alternative to the inability to play a half-dragon. Furthermore, aasimars, tieflings, dhampirs, oreads, sylphs, undines and ifrits weren't THAT popular to begin with... and yet, they had booklets. The lycanthrope template is popular and I could understand why it got a booklet and an alternate race.

3) Kitsune? Really now? They add the Dragon Empires books and the Advance Race Guide. There's not much to add there. The ONLY thing I would like to see for the kitsunes is a reworked Magical Tail feat so I would tyake only ONE time and have it grow along as I level up instead of taking it 8 times and screwing up my build.

Sczarni RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I would like to see 2 books based on the 7 virtues of rules/mortal sins based on those of Lissala/the Runelords. Character background charts, classes, feats, spells; preferably 1 of each per virtue/sin.

Silver Crusade

That sounds pretty awesome.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Looks like I'm a little late to the party, but I think I came up with a pretty good idea. "Guilds of Golarion," A book that would go through some of the establishments for classes such as churches, thieves' guilds, and mercenary companies, or even the Pathfinder Society itself! It could include some great fluff about said organizations such as general hierarchy and how the guilds interact with each other, crunch in the form of feats, traits, and other such things. It could provide rules for setting up a new branch in the PCs free time, setting up their own organizations, or even use fighting between the guilds as a plot hook or even the twist itself.

I would very much like feedback on this, since I do wish to enter into a writing field such as this, and I know some of my players would LOVE a book like this!!


Blood of Shadows. There have been some very interesting tidbits having to do with the Shadow Plane in the setting and I always liked the shadar-kai in 3.5. The Shadow and Astral planes seem woefully underdetailed in this setting.

Blood of the Created: Many races were created by older beings for nefarious purposes or enslaved by beings like the aboleths, etc. I also enjoy the warforged from Eberron, so something similar to them might be cool.


Pathfinder Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I agree with zergtitan, Blood of the Coven is the players companion I would love to see. More support for Changeling witches and a way for changelings to lead a coven would make me giddy as a goat.

Scarab Sages

With all due respect for other people's stances on the matter, I'd just like to put down 1 vote AGAINST something like Warforged. I don't object in any kind of "Oh noes C-3PO doesn't belong in D&D" sense, I just don't feel they were well-designed; they feel to me like someone said, "I want construct PCs, but I'd rather ignore the implications of this both good and ill with the exception of a few particular details I'm interested in."

Liberty's Edge

Starfinder Superscriber
Matthew French wrote:

Looks like I'm a little late to the party, but I think I came up with a pretty good idea. "Guilds of Golarion," A book that would go through some of the establishments for classes such as churches, thieves' guilds, and mercenary companies, or even the Pathfinder Society itself! It could include some great fluff about said organizations such as general hierarchy and how the guilds interact with each other, crunch in the form of feats, traits, and other such things. It could provide rules for setting up a new branch in the PCs free time, setting up their own organizations, or even use fighting between the guilds as a plot hook or even the twist itself.

I would very much like feedback on this, since I do wish to enter into a writing field such as this, and I know some of my players would LOVE a book like this!!

There is the Faction Guide in the Campaign Setting that already does some of this-- at least with large organizations like the Pathfinder Society.

I think where your idea would be most useful would be if rather than talking about large, relevant-to-the-whole world groups (such as are found in the Faction Guide), it talked about (and gave examples of) typical thieves guilds, merchant guilds, mercenary companies, etc. that are found in towns and small cities, and that are relevant and important there, but that are not known or even relevant farther away. Generic would be good because then the information could be used in whatever campaign.


rknop wrote:
Matthew French wrote:

Looks like I'm a little late to the party, but I think I came up with a pretty good idea. "Guilds of Golarion," A book that would go through some of the establishments for classes such as churches, thieves' guilds, and mercenary companies, or even the Pathfinder Society itself! It could include some great fluff about said organizations such as general hierarchy and how the guilds interact with each other, crunch in the form of feats, traits, and other such things. It could provide rules for setting up a new branch in the PCs free time, setting up their own organizations, or even use fighting between the guilds as a plot hook or even the twist itself.

I would very much like feedback on this, since I do wish to enter into a writing field such as this, and I know some of my players would LOVE a book like this!!

There is the Faction Guide in the Campaign Setting that already does some of this-- at least with large organizations like the Pathfinder Society.

I think where your idea would be most useful would be if rather than talking about large, relevant-to-the-whole world groups (such as are found in the Faction Guide), it talked about (and gave examples of) typical thieves guilds, merchant guilds, mercenary companies, etc. that are found in towns and small cities, and that are relevant and important there, but that are not known or even relevant farther away. Generic would be good because then the information could be used in whatever campaign.

That actual sounds like exactly what I wanted! Wow, thanks! I had no idea that existed!! :D


Considering Blood of the Elements, a Blood of the Beasts with many races would hurt Paizo...

Liberty's Edge

Yeah, since Elements, I'm inclined to think one race per book anymore. With subraces/heritages, of course.


Samy wrote:
Yeah, since Elements, I'm inclined to think one race per book anymore. With subraces/heritages, of course.

The one problem with this is that it would take years before paizo even got around to covering half of the races we want covered :(

Scarab Sages

I'm very much on board with molding sourcebooks around overarching themes (like Blood of Shadow, which I'm rooting for).

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Matrix Dragon wrote:
Samy wrote:
Yeah, since Elements, I'm inclined to think one race per book anymore. With subraces/heritages, of course.
The one problem with this is that it would take years before paizo even got around to covering half of the races we want covered :(

Yeah but it's better than getting none of the races covered in sufficient depth.

I'd rather take 16 pages of one race than 1 page of 16 races each.

Scarab Sages

Samy wrote:


I'd rather take 16 pages of one race than 1 page of 16 races each.

I think I agree with this.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Matrix Dragon wrote:
Samy wrote:
Yeah, since Elements, I'm inclined to think one race per book anymore. With subraces/heritages, of course.
The one problem with this is that it would take years before paizo even got around to covering half of the races we want covered :(

Actually, in my case they were done covering the races I want covered over a year ago. ;)


Samy wrote:
Matrix Dragon wrote:
Samy wrote:
Yeah, since Elements, I'm inclined to think one race per book anymore. With subraces/heritages, of course.
The one problem with this is that it would take years before paizo even got around to covering half of the races we want covered :(

Yeah but it's better than getting none of the races covered in sufficient depth.

I'd rather take 16 pages of one race than 1 page of 16 races each.

Yea it is kind of true. Every time a book doesn't cover races sufficently means that *at best* an opportunity has been lost for years.

This was essentially the problem with the 2 page races in the APG, abilities that should have been detailed and fun archtypes or bloodlines got watered down into weak feats due to space issues.


Matrix Dragon wrote:
Samy wrote:
Matrix Dragon wrote:
Samy wrote:
Yeah, since Elements, I'm inclined to think one race per book anymore. With subraces/heritages, of course.
The one problem with this is that it would take years before paizo even got around to covering half of the races we want covered :(

Yeah but it's better than getting none of the races covered in sufficient depth.

I'd rather take 16 pages of one race than 1 page of 16 races each.

Yea it is kind of true. Every time a book doesn't cover races sufficently means that *at best* an opportunity has been lost for years.

This was essentially the problem with the 2 page races in the APG, abilities that should have been detailed and fun archtypes or bloodlines got watered down into weak feats due to space issues.

*points to my suggestion*

HELLO?!?

Sounds like a no-brainer at this point...

Liberty's Edge

Blood of Dragons will probably show up eventually, don't worry.

I just hope they don't make the same mistake they did with Blood of Elements, and try to put too many races in.


Samy wrote:

Blood of Dragons will probably show up eventually, don't worry.

I just hope they don't make the same mistake they did with Blood of Elements, and try to put too many races in.

Well... the Half-Elemental Template had like 8 variations, plus the Half-Janni Template... That's a lot of cover.

A Blood of Dragons booklet should only have 1 [new] race and 5 bloodlines (chromatic, metallic, primal, imperial and outer), no need to add more actual races to the mix, like Kobolds and such.

Dark Archive

I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:

B) some way for Sorcerers to be Intelligence-based that permits more versatility than the Sage variant Bloodline, and is not as "through-the-nose" as the Crossblooded Archetype (although it makes good enough sense for classes like Bards and Summoners, and I'd personally be inclined to say Clerics and Oracles should perhaps be reversed in this regard, the one qualm being that it push Channeling Energy beyond the pale power-wise, I felt that making Sorcerer magic Charisma-based was a mistake ever since I first opened up the 3.0 Player's Handbook - on the other hand, I love most-if-not-all of the other things Pathfinder has since done with Sorcerers; though this would not be my first choice, I could see a racial Archetype for Elven/Elf-Blooded Sorcerers that made this change and not too many others as making sense),

and I will buy it and I will play with it.

Right there with you on linking Elves to Sorcery (over Wizardry), since they've always felt more 'innately magical' than particularly fond of reading books and memorizing rote formula. (Dwarves, on the other hand, oh yes, wizardry for the win!)

As for the stat stuff, I'd be keen on seeing various class stats opened up. A Sorcerer or Bard who uses Intelligence as his casting stat? A Druid who uses either Intelligence or Charisma? Why not?

The Witch is my number one with a bullet for disconnecting them from their current casting stat, since Wisdom, in particular, 'feels' more thematically appropriate to me. Divide them up into 'orders' of Bell, Book and Candle. The witches of the Book use Intelligence, just like normal. Witches of the Candle use Wisdom to determine bonus spells, spell DCs and effects and DCs of various hexes, but otherwise are mechanically identical to Book witches (who, despite being of the order of the Book, don't actually use spellbooks). And the order of the Bell use Charisma as their casting / hex stat.

Then again, I'm also a fan of just allowing any casting class to be a prepared or spontaneous caster, decided at first level, and for *all* of them to gain spells known like a bard/sorcerer/oracle *or* have to acquire and add spells to a record or source over time like a wizard or witch. And so there would be Bards and Clerics and Paladins that carry sheafs of musical notation or epic poetry or holy canon or sacred rites around that they use to prepare their spells in the morning, and Druids and Rangers and yet more Clerics who only know a small selection of 'Spells Known' and cast them flexibly like an oracle or sorcerer.

It would be a gigantic 'nerf' for Clerics and Druids, in particular, who are used to having every spell on their list all for free, having to choose between a small spontaneous Spells Known list like a Sorcerer, or a 'book' (or holy scrolls or ogham logbook etched onto rolled up bark) of sacred rituals that they've accumulated at great expense over many years. Paladins and Rangers, etc. would also take a hit, but their spell lists are already quite a bit smaller.

But I'm okay with that.

Liberty's Edge

Starfinder Superscriber

We should remember that at the PaizoCon banquet, Erik Mona promised "Grippli of Golarion" after hearing Jason Buhlman do a frog voice.

Scarab Sages

Set wrote:

Right there with you on linking Elves to Sorcery (over Wizardry), since they've always felt more 'innately magical' than particularly fond of reading books and memorizing rote formula. (Dwarves, on the other hand, oh yes, wizardry for the win!)

"Memorizing rote formula," no; "reading books," of course! What do you think innately magical people do with their spare time (that would have been a way better way for mages to restore mana in the field in World of Warcraft - you don't get magic from frigging water, you sit down and read a short fairy tale!)?

On a related note, since somebody thought it made one iota of sense to make an "Orc Bloodline" for Sorcerers, shouldn't there be, at the very least, Elf and Gnome Bloodlines (either that, or everyone agrees to say the Orc Bloodline never happened)?

Anyways, New Idea For The Day: One of my Pathfinder Society buddies and I were talking, and what occurred to us was:

Blood of the Inebriated/Brews of Golarion/The Vintner's Handbook. Alcohol has long been a fixture, in one form or another, of RPGs, and so far, we've got a Drunken Brute Barbarian Archetype and a Drunken Master Monk Archetype (to say nothing of a Drunken God, and some of the traits He offers His worshipers) - how about a Tavern Singer Bard? A Bartender/Innkeeper NPC Class (since they're significant enough to adventurers to perhaps be more than just another variety of Expert)? A Brewmeister Alchemist? A Bootlegger Rogue? A Bouncer/Barhopper/Raging Drunk Fighter? An Order of the Stein for Cavaliers (one of their Order Abilities possibly being "Beer For My Horses" - and/or a suitably "drunken" Animal Companion Archetype)? Absinthe-swilling arcane spellcasters? Communion/seder rituals for Clerics, Inquisitors, Paladins, and Antipaladins? "Magic" fungus for Druids and Rangers? Bay leaves, volcanic fumes, and "wisdom weeds" for Oracles (to say nothing of substance abuse-themed Oracle Curses)? Options for teetotalers? Alcohol-themed monsters (a variety of Undead that rises from OD-related deaths is a no-brainer - how about a mutant worm that burst out of a bottle of magical tequila? A Booze Ooze? A variety of "Tempter" Devil that specializes in driving people to drink? Pink elephants?)?


rknop wrote:
We should remember that at the PaizoCon banquet, Erik Mona promised "Grippli of Golarion" after hearing Jason Buhlman do a frog voice.

If a Grippli book comes out before Dragons or Kitsune.... *sadface*

I simply don't see the appeal of the Grippli. Then again a lot of other people feel the same way about the races that *I* like XD


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I would say that totally depends on the Grippli book and it´s content.
Pretty sure there could be a good surprise!

Silver Crusade

Well they just released a statement about taking Assimar and Tiefling out of PFS play while adding Kitsune, Nagaji, and Wayang. I suspect that we will see a "blood of the beast" relatively soon. I also suspect that we will see some Fetchling convention boons floating around soon and a "blood of shadows" before too long, which will probably introduce a new shadow tied race as well.

I suspect we will see a splat book for additional support for all the races in the Advanced Races Guide eventually.


Yea, the fact that those three races have been added to the PFS allowed list makes me very hopeful that there will be a book that covers them in more detail. The market is certainly there.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I´m really totally opposed to a "blood of the beast".
First it sounds more like were-somethings.
Second, as much as i like Paizo, i don´t think it´s a good idea to handle several races, especially some that have nothing in common but fur, in one player companion. It´s not enough place there for that and the quality of the book will only suffer.
There are now two comparable books on the market, bastards of Golarion and blood of the elements.
Bastards is quite good, but it covers half-races whose parents races all got a book on their own already. Also they can draw on those books and a lot more stuff.
Blood of the elements misses that, among some other things.
I sincerely hope Paizo can find another, better approach for new books.

One book per race would be best.
And certainly better than a book about ranged combat (even without reading it, yes). This could also offer the opportunity to let people know a lot more about that race and the specialties and tie-ins into Golarion, making it a lot easier to develop a good character.
And get us a bit away from the never-ending powercreep options.


Pathfinder Lost Omens, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I think it's more likely we will get a Blood of the Dragon Empires instead with that list.

Scarab Sages

mswbear wrote:

Well they just released a statement about taking Assimar and Tiefling out of PFS play while adding Kitsune, Nagaji, and Wayang.

What does that mean for presently-in-play Aasimar and Tiefling characters?


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:
mswbear wrote:

Well they just released a statement about taking Assimar and Tiefling out of PFS play while adding Kitsune, Nagaji, and Wayang.

What does that mean for presently-in-play Aasimar and Tiefling characters?

Nothing. They will be grandfathered in.

I think you can play them till the end of levelling or permadead.

Liberty's Edge

I'm running six tables of PFS at GenCon JUST so I can get a Grippli boon. So a Grippli of Golarion would make that great and the envy of my local PFS lodge.

But man y'all got so many awesome ideas. I love the Kitsune, Dragonborn and Coven ideas. I also dig the theme of Brews of Golarion.


Maybe 32 pages isn't enough anymore.


My suggestions:

1. "Classes of Golarion": The basic idea is that each volume provides setting-specific infos on each class. For example, "Paladins of Golarion" could feature a section in which most plausible paladin's faiths are analyzed region by region, a general overview of how each region sees paladins, region-specific paladin archetypes, mount choices, spells, magic items, equipment; but also presenting famous paladins of Golarion, notorious paladin-esque organizations around the Inner Sea, rules for joining them and so on. "Fighters of Golarion" could focus on region-specific archetypes and combat styles or feats, fighters NPC to add to home-campaigns based on those feats and styles or on the region in which the adventure takes place, fighting schools, renowned fighters, and so on; "Rogues of Golarion" could instead focus on Golarion thieves' guilds, description of archetypes more suitable for each region, an overview of how each region sees crime, how it's punished, what type of crime is overlooked, and why, where, etc.; "Clerics of Golarion" could finally focus on religions and how their priests are seen region by region, with specific archetypes for each faith, a list of temples and religious organization for each country, etc. This way, all of the classes would get some love, and none of them would be neglected, with each volume providing specific informations and ideas to anyone willing to play a character of that class or creating NPCs who are part of that class.

2. "Organizations of Golarion": This would function identically to Seekers of Secrets and Pathfinder Society Field Guide. Well, this would maybe function better as Campaign Setting than Player's Companion, but the sense of the proposal remains the same: give some love to Golarion's organizations other than PFS. Red Mantis Assassins, Hellknights, Aspis Consortium, etc. all are in need of a sourcebook providing additional lore, player options and setting specific informations about how and where they operate throughout Golarion. Usually those informations (where present, such as for hellknights) are scattered around APs, Campaign Settings boxes and so on, but are lacking of a unified and systematic analysis that could add some great in-depth into Golarion. Just imagine how good would be to have 3-4 new archetypes for Hellknights, specific feats for each order, specific spells that only Hellknights are teached to use, new hellknight armors (maybe light and medium?), new weapons (maybe an hellknight flail is different from the standard one?), new alchemical items, new animal companions or mounts best suited to hellknights, new materials for armors and weapons, a specific code of conduct for each order, a list of renowned hellknights complete of stat blocks, an overview of how each class could better fullfill his duties as a hellknight enforcer. That would be great!


Put up a vote for "Aristocrats of Golarion" with an overview of notable families throughout the Inner Sea Region. Not necessarily royals, but the sorts of people who'd be directly serving/dealing with kings and queens. Barons, lords, dukes and the like.

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories, PF Special Edition Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Superscriber

I still want a Shrines & Pilgrimages one like the Magical Marketplace, but for divine casters.

Liberty's Edge

Starfinder Superscriber

KITTENS OF GOLARION


As soon as I saw the Grippli were tailor made to be Alchemists, I made one. His name is Kyr'Met. Original, no? And yes, I can do the voice rather well, thank you.
I would be ecstatic to get a "Grippli of Golarion" book!

Dark Archive

Food of Golarion
Blood of Giants
Drugs of Golarion
Blood of Planets
Murder-Hobos of Golarion

251 to 300 of 361 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Pathfinder Player Companion / Player Companions: What's Next? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.