More I didn't check it before I played my fortnightly game.
Darn. Not going to be able to use it then.
If the DC to escape from rope or bindings is higher than 20 + your Escape Artist skill bonus, you cannot escape from the bonds using Escape Artist.
@Xaratherus : There is no such thing as fumbling in Pathfinder. A "1" is simply a failure, not a critical one (you don't take additionnal effects with a "1" in a save, and you don't throw your sword with a "1" on an attack roll).
I believe he was talking about fumbles as degrees of failures while you were talking about natural 1s.
Appraise , Climb, Disable Device ,Diplomacy ,Intimidate,Sense Motive,Swim ,Fly are all fail by 5 and something happens)
Appraise also has one if you are 1-4
Linguistics has a wisdom check if you fail
UMD has a fumble if you (fail and roll a 1) or if you fail by 10
Joe M. wrote:
For 1-5 (using 500 and 1300)
Play down once get 500GP and 1xp (Current system)
Someone who plays up once and down once.
1800GP and 2xp (Current system) = 1,133.5 per xp
playing down twice
1000GP and 2xp (Current system) = 650 per xp
playing up twice
2600 and 2xp = 1300 per xp
Assuming 6 in tier and the following games
Then per xp
playing up twice changes from 911.11 to 560
At L6 (15xp)
playing up twice changes from 980 to 806.67
Half XP/Double XP (and teir played at gold) will make the wealth gap bigger and playing down the preferred choice.
Holding sheets until you get to the right level will make it harder to form tables as people won't want to play up at all.(increased cost in consumables.)
Cold Napalm wrote:
If your actually serious about WBL, the ONLY fix is to have a chart. You get X amount of gold based on level per session.
And someone who plays down will spend less on healing then someone who plays up.
The main problem I see with dis-incentiving OOT play in general is does it make it harder to form tables?
Also how do faction missions play a role in PP penalty?
With the GP penalty:
Currently playing down gets you low-teir gold. Under HOD the penalty is reduced as you are only playing down for .5xp instead of 1xp.
Based on my reading I like the double/half reward option.
The only problem with that one that I see is:
However with no penalty for playing down it makes it easy for the new players to choose the playing down option. This might makes games more attractive for new people to get into and play.
I also like the way it brings the character's levels together.
I would add a qualifier to that.
A movie might only be about 1 person. And for that case I would add if their is more then one named male character is their also more then one named female character.
I think the door example would be hardness
Any word on that alleged tree die off?
I did a Google search for 'europe tree die off' the following spoiler contains the top 10
Not specifically about the die off of trees but did make the top 10.
4) a law passed forbidding politicians from collecting a paycheck above minimum wage. It shouldn't be a career. It's a public service.
and would that include taking money from companies , including ones they own?
Ring of Sustenance.
Doesn't global warming do something with the jet stream that means the cold arctic wind gets to Sweden?
If the cable is tight then the top will be pulled up.
3% growth for 40 years brings it to 225 trillion.
It was the second image on a Google search. (The 1st was 1970-1990).
I can't find a graph for 1990-2012 But I have since found one for since 2008.
Apart from the 2008 peak which was for a time lest then a year, The price has been hovering around the highest point ever for a couple of years.
Does not look like a falling price to me.
Sounds like a confusion of terms. I think your gm is thinking spell slots and you are thinking spells per day.
Their is a feat.
Dual Path (Mythic)
The way I came up with for a soft cap is you calculate your saves and BAB etc normally.
However if they are above a figure (I.e the full progression in 3.5 epic) they are capped.
So yes you can go full wizard but your saves and BAB are lower then someone who took fighter at some point.
Another similar thing is the gestalt rules. Every extra level is a level in one of the classes that make up the gestalt.
I am sure this has been answered before but I can't find it.
One of the GMs at my local game shop said he had GMed the scenario and therefore could not play it as their was already a legal table.
My understanding is you can play and GM a (non Tier 1) sceanrio in either order and get a chronicle for both.
Also when GMing then playing you just have to tell the GM and it does not matter about the number of players.
I think to get that exact figure you were considering
A,B,C drawn out could go into the box as A,B,C A,C,B B,A,C etc. which would increase the possibilities by 6.
Chris Evans 52 wrote:
Ah. I am not saying their is x ways of getting the combination, I was saying their was 1 combination in question and x number of possibilities.
Chris Evans 52 wrote:
Using your method with 4 minis and 2 spots.
4*3 = 12 . * 2 ways = 24 combinations
1,2 1,3 1,4
That is only 12. What are the other 12?
divide by 2 is 6. which means that their should be 6 combinations where the 1st number is lower.
or for 3 minis and 3 spots.
3*2*1 = 6 possibly ways of getting those minis without considering the order.
Chris Evans 52 wrote:
If you want numbers how about this (using 1-50 to account for rarity, rounding down, and ignoring the large creature), the chance at getting any specific "Random assortment in each box" is about 1 in 100,000 The chance of getting them in a specific order is about 1 in 700,000. The chance of getting three boxes of the exact same figures, in the exact same order is about 1 in 351,298,031,616,000,000.
Their are 6 ways arranging 3 figures.[A,B,C] , [A,C,B] etc
Now assuming you don't have duplicate figures in a box and 44 medium/small minis.
44*43*42=79,464 ways of picking 3 different numbers from 44 with the order mattering.
39,732 if you consider just flips (i.e 1,2,3 and 3,2,1)
13,244 of you consider A,B,C the same as A,C,B etc.
times those numbers by 16 for the large minis.
of cause some of those have 3 rares and are very unlikely so the pool of likely boxes is even smaller then those numbers.
If both stores take out the uncommons and rarer replacing them with commons.
20*19*18= 6,840 , 3,420 & 1,140 ways of getting 3 commons.
judging from the case experience threads I don't think their is A,B,C,D
only 4 boosters of the 1st share the same two lowest numbers from the 2nd.
Yes getting two of the same bricks is annoying but even in a random assortment it would happen occasionally.
Also if a case was Bricks A,B,C and D then they would contain all of the Rares.
Unless you are saying that retail cases were packed differently to the ones that came from pazio?
Christopher Dudley wrote:
I was thinking a sword. the main question though is which mini is it from.
DM Wellard wrote:
Bent staffs are always a problem....me I dont mind the bent weapon problem if it isnt endemic to the whole set.DDM bows were a major culprit in this regard
Yep. too little plastic.
Not sure what the pic is though.
I think one of my minis was broken.
While breaking the boxes down I found this
also the staff of my two 52 runelords
orientating so writing is on top.
Top far brick.
from LtR TtB
top near brick.
bottom far brick
botom near brick
2 OF 1
3 OF 2
3 OF 3
2 OF 4
2 OF 5
3 OF 6
3 OF 7
2 OF 8
1 OF 9
3 OF 10
4 OF 11
3 OF 12
4 OF 13
2 OF 14
3 OF 15
2 OF 16
2 OF 17
3 OF 18
3 OF 19
3 OF 20
4 OF 21
1 OF 22
3 OF 23
2 OF 24
3 OF 25
2 OF 26
3 OF 27
2 OF 28
2 OF 29
3 OF 30
2 OF 31
2 OF 32
1 OF 33
3 OF 34
2 OF 35
2 OF 36
2 OF 37
3 OF 38
2 OF 39
1 OF 40
2 OF 41
3 OF 42
3 OF 43
3 OF 44
2 OF 45
2 OF 46
1 OF 48
1 OF 50
1 OF 51
2 OF 52
2 OF 53
2 OF 56
1 OF 57
1 OF 58
2 OF 59
2 OF 60
Erik Keith wrote:
The package did arrive, it just didn't have the rune giant. But on the customer service forum they are going to send a replacement with my next subscription shipment. Thank you for the service.
My huge case from paizo.
L to R, T to B
by mini number
61 Karzoug Statue 1
my other box is very hard to get out of the box it came in and so that one will be delayed.
and my rune giant was not in the box.
Adamantine Dragon wrote:
#2 may be the one that some people would find the most troublesome.
2 might be fun in my opinion. (especially if I could make a item to identify the areas. (Basically something like continuous flame. Which should be affected by the differences. ))